Effects of mechanical thinning on botrytis bunch rot on Sauvignon blanc wine grapes

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
D. Mundy, M. Trought, A. McLachlan, S. Neal, Dominic Pecchenino
{"title":"Effects of mechanical thinning on botrytis bunch rot on Sauvignon blanc wine grapes","authors":"D. Mundy, M. Trought, A. McLachlan, S. Neal, Dominic Pecchenino","doi":"10.30843/nzpp.2021.74.11729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mechanical fruit thinning could be a practical and cost-effective alternative to hand thinning of Sauvignon blanc grapes to increase quality by reducing yield. Botrytis bunch rot, caused by the fungus Botrytis cinerea, is the main seasonal disease risk for grapes grown in New Zealand but it is unknown if this disease is exacerbated by mechanical rather than manual thinning of the vines. It was hypothesised that the damage caused by mechanical thinning would result in more disease or increase disease pressure than hand thinning or no thinning. Botrytis bunch rot was determined in the field at harvest following mechanical thinning in the 2009, 2010 and 2011 seasons compared with an un-thinned control. In the 2011 season, possible mechanisms that may have influenced disease severity were investigated. The parameters investigated were: bunch openness; berry susceptibility to infection; and percentage of bunch debris infected with Botrytis cinerea. Mechanical thinning resulted in the same or lower observed disease severity compared with the un-thinned control in the 2009, 2010 and 2011 seasons while reducing yield as desired. In all seasons, both heavy and light machine thinning treatments reduced incidence of botrytis compared to the un-thinned control and the heavy machine treatment always reduced disease severity compared to the un-thinned control. Berry susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea was a complex interaction between various factors. Heavy machine thinned berries without wounding and inoculation were significantly less susceptible than the un-thinned control. Further investigation will be required to determine if the significant differences observed in berry susceptibility to infection and total infected bunch debris per bunch can be correlated with observed field disease levels.","PeriodicalId":19180,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand Plant Protection","volume":"54 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand Plant Protection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30843/nzpp.2021.74.11729","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Mechanical fruit thinning could be a practical and cost-effective alternative to hand thinning of Sauvignon blanc grapes to increase quality by reducing yield. Botrytis bunch rot, caused by the fungus Botrytis cinerea, is the main seasonal disease risk for grapes grown in New Zealand but it is unknown if this disease is exacerbated by mechanical rather than manual thinning of the vines. It was hypothesised that the damage caused by mechanical thinning would result in more disease or increase disease pressure than hand thinning or no thinning. Botrytis bunch rot was determined in the field at harvest following mechanical thinning in the 2009, 2010 and 2011 seasons compared with an un-thinned control. In the 2011 season, possible mechanisms that may have influenced disease severity were investigated. The parameters investigated were: bunch openness; berry susceptibility to infection; and percentage of bunch debris infected with Botrytis cinerea. Mechanical thinning resulted in the same or lower observed disease severity compared with the un-thinned control in the 2009, 2010 and 2011 seasons while reducing yield as desired. In all seasons, both heavy and light machine thinning treatments reduced incidence of botrytis compared to the un-thinned control and the heavy machine treatment always reduced disease severity compared to the un-thinned control. Berry susceptibility to Botrytis cinerea was a complex interaction between various factors. Heavy machine thinned berries without wounding and inoculation were significantly less susceptible than the un-thinned control. Further investigation will be required to determine if the significant differences observed in berry susceptibility to infection and total infected bunch debris per bunch can be correlated with observed field disease levels.
机械间伐对长相思酿酒葡萄葡萄腐枝病的影响
机械减薄是一种实用且经济的方法,可以代替手工减薄长相思葡萄,通过减少产量来提高质量。葡萄腐病是由真菌葡萄腐病引起的,是新西兰葡萄种植的主要季节性疾病风险,但目前尚不清楚这种疾病是否因机械而不是人工修剪葡萄藤而加剧。假设机械减薄造成的损伤会比手减薄或不减薄导致更多疾病或增加疾病压力。在2009年、2010年和2011年收获季进行机械间伐后,与未间伐的对照进行了葡萄腐枝病的田间检测。在2011年季节,对可能影响疾病严重程度的可能机制进行了调查。研究的参数有:束开度;浆果对感染的易感性;束屑感染灰葡萄孢菌的百分比。在2009年、2010年和2011年三季,与未间伐的对照相比,机械间伐导致观察到的病害严重程度相同或更低,但产量却有所降低。在所有季节,与未稀释对照相比,重型和轻型机器稀释处理都降低了葡萄球菌病的发病率,重型机器处理总是比未稀释对照降低疾病严重程度。浆果对灰霉病的敏感性是多种因素之间复杂的相互作用。未伤、未接种的重机减薄草莓的易感程度明显低于未减薄对照。需要进一步调查,以确定观察到的浆果对感染的易感性和每束受感染的束碎片总数的显著差异是否与观察到的田间病害水平相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
New Zealand Plant Protection
New Zealand Plant Protection Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊介绍: New Zealand Plant Protection is the journal of the New Zealand Plant Protection Society. It publishes original research papers on all aspects of biology, ecology and control of weeds, vertebrate and invertebrate pests, and pathogens and beneficial micro-organisms in agriculture, horticulture, forestry and natural ecosystems of relevance to New Zealand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信