The Relevance of Synergy Between Forensic Pathologist and Toxicologist in Medico-Legal Autopsies

L. Desinan, A. Colatutto, P. Sala
{"title":"The Relevance of Synergy Between Forensic Pathologist and Toxicologist in Medico-Legal Autopsies","authors":"L. Desinan, A. Colatutto, P. Sala","doi":"10.2174/1874340401306010013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In forensic toxicology the main relevant scope of toxicologist is to answer these following questions: which kind of drug is involved? Is the analytical result related to death? Which is the supposed lethal dose? Despite the technological improvement in laboratory medicine, the main questions are apparently unresolved, because the availability of new laboratory instrumentation has sometimes increased the complexity of the medical examiner task. In post mortem toxicology the medical examiner's and the toxicologist's role is constantly challenged by analytical, methodological, circumstantial problems, and only the single professional experience can help to find which drug is involved. In our experience the only way to avoid, or limit, mistakes is to follow strictly a Search Strategy, which combines single professional experience, circumstantial data and a correct and a punctual manner of sampling from corpses. The most complete and proper tissue sampling from autopsy is mandatory for the whole diagnostic process. This approach in synergy with the pathologist and toxicologist dialogue can help the medical examiner to avoid mistakes and positively infer the whole diagnostic process.","PeriodicalId":22859,"journal":{"name":"The Open Toxicology Journal","volume":"72 1","pages":"13-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open Toxicology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1874340401306010013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In forensic toxicology the main relevant scope of toxicologist is to answer these following questions: which kind of drug is involved? Is the analytical result related to death? Which is the supposed lethal dose? Despite the technological improvement in laboratory medicine, the main questions are apparently unresolved, because the availability of new laboratory instrumentation has sometimes increased the complexity of the medical examiner task. In post mortem toxicology the medical examiner's and the toxicologist's role is constantly challenged by analytical, methodological, circumstantial problems, and only the single professional experience can help to find which drug is involved. In our experience the only way to avoid, or limit, mistakes is to follow strictly a Search Strategy, which combines single professional experience, circumstantial data and a correct and a punctual manner of sampling from corpses. The most complete and proper tissue sampling from autopsy is mandatory for the whole diagnostic process. This approach in synergy with the pathologist and toxicologist dialogue can help the medical examiner to avoid mistakes and positively infer the whole diagnostic process.
法医病理学家和毒理学家在法医尸检中协同作用的相关性
在法医毒理学中,毒理学家的主要相关范围是回答以下问题:涉及哪种药物?分析结果与死亡有关吗?什么是所谓的致死剂量?尽管检验医学的技术有了进步,但主要问题显然还没有解决,因为新的实验室仪器的可用性有时增加了法医工作的复杂性。在死后毒理学中,法医和毒理学家的角色不断受到分析、方法学和环境问题的挑战,只有单一的专业经验才能帮助发现涉及哪种药物。根据我们的经验,避免或限制错误的唯一方法是严格遵循搜索策略,该策略结合了单一的专业经验,间接数据以及从尸体中正确及时取样的方式。在整个诊断过程中,尸检中最完整、最适当的组织取样是必须的。这种方法与病理学家和毒理学家对话的协同作用可以帮助法医避免错误,并积极地推断整个诊断过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信