The effects of sleep and targeted memory reactivation on the consolidation of relevant and irrelevant information

C. Barner, Ann-Sophie Werner, Sandra Schörk, Jan Born, S. Diekelmann
{"title":"The effects of sleep and targeted memory reactivation on the consolidation of relevant and irrelevant information","authors":"C. Barner, Ann-Sophie Werner, Sandra Schörk, Jan Born, S. Diekelmann","doi":"10.3389/frsle.2023.1187170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Sleep is assumed to facilitate the consolidation of new memories in an active process of covert reactivation of the underlying memory representations. Recent evidence suggests that this process is selective by favoring memories that are of future relevance, and can be externally triggered by learning-associated sensory cues presented during sleep [i.e., targeted memory reactivation (TMR)]. In the present study, we (1) set out to confirm the preferential sleep effect for relevant information, and then asked whether (2) simultaneous TMR of relevant and irrelevant information facilitates the advantage for relevant information, and (3) whether the preferential benefit of sleep and TMR for relevant information persists over time. Methods To test these questions, participants explicitly learned two sets of picture-location associations, of which one set was instructed (after encoding) to be relevant and the other to be irrelevant for later testing. In Experiment 1, memory was tested after ~12 h of night sleep (n = 28) or daytime wakefulness (n = 28) as well as again after ~1 week. Results Results showed overall better memory retention after sleep compared to wakefulness after 12 h as well as after 1 week. The relevant memories were overall retained better than the irrelevant memories. Interestingly, a trend toward a stronger sleep benefit for the relevant memories emerged after 1 week, although this effect failed to reach significance. In Experiment 2, learning of the relevant and irrelevant picture-location associations took place in the presence of an odor. During subsequent sleep, in the first phase of slow wave sleep (SWS), participants were either presented with the odor again (n = 23) or received an odorless vehicle (n = 20). Memory retention was assessed after the first SWS period (following awakening) as well as after ~one week. As in Experiment 1, relevant memories were overall retained better than irrelevant memories. However, TMR did not differentially affect the retention of relevant and irrelevant memories. Discussion These findings provide tentative evidence that the selective benefit of sleep for relevant memories evolves over time but is not further facilitated by TMR.","PeriodicalId":73106,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in sleep","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in sleep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frsle.2023.1187170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Sleep is assumed to facilitate the consolidation of new memories in an active process of covert reactivation of the underlying memory representations. Recent evidence suggests that this process is selective by favoring memories that are of future relevance, and can be externally triggered by learning-associated sensory cues presented during sleep [i.e., targeted memory reactivation (TMR)]. In the present study, we (1) set out to confirm the preferential sleep effect for relevant information, and then asked whether (2) simultaneous TMR of relevant and irrelevant information facilitates the advantage for relevant information, and (3) whether the preferential benefit of sleep and TMR for relevant information persists over time. Methods To test these questions, participants explicitly learned two sets of picture-location associations, of which one set was instructed (after encoding) to be relevant and the other to be irrelevant for later testing. In Experiment 1, memory was tested after ~12 h of night sleep (n = 28) or daytime wakefulness (n = 28) as well as again after ~1 week. Results Results showed overall better memory retention after sleep compared to wakefulness after 12 h as well as after 1 week. The relevant memories were overall retained better than the irrelevant memories. Interestingly, a trend toward a stronger sleep benefit for the relevant memories emerged after 1 week, although this effect failed to reach significance. In Experiment 2, learning of the relevant and irrelevant picture-location associations took place in the presence of an odor. During subsequent sleep, in the first phase of slow wave sleep (SWS), participants were either presented with the odor again (n = 23) or received an odorless vehicle (n = 20). Memory retention was assessed after the first SWS period (following awakening) as well as after ~one week. As in Experiment 1, relevant memories were overall retained better than irrelevant memories. However, TMR did not differentially affect the retention of relevant and irrelevant memories. Discussion These findings provide tentative evidence that the selective benefit of sleep for relevant memories evolves over time but is not further facilitated by TMR.
睡眠和目标记忆再激活对相关和不相关信息巩固的影响
睡眠被认为是促进新记忆巩固的一个积极的过程中隐蔽的重新激活潜在的记忆表征。最近的证据表明,这一过程是选择性的,有利于与未来相关的记忆,并且可以由睡眠中出现的与学习相关的感官线索(即目标记忆再激活(TMR))外部触发。在本研究中,我们(1)从确认睡眠对相关信息的优先效应出发,进而探究(2)同时进行相关信息和不相关信息的TMR是否会促进相关信息的优势,(3)睡眠和TMR对相关信息的优先效益是否会随着时间的推移而持续。为了测试这些问题,参与者明确学习了两组图片-位置关联,其中一组被指示(编码后)相关,另一组被指示不相关。在实验1中,在夜间睡眠~12小时(n = 28)或白天清醒(n = 28)以及~1周后再次进行记忆测试。结果:与12小时后和1周后的清醒状态相比,睡眠后的整体记忆保持情况更好。总的来说,相关的记忆比不相关的记忆保留得更好。有趣的是,睡眠对相关记忆的益处在一周后出现了增强的趋势,尽管这种效果没有达到显著程度。在实验2中,相关和不相关的图片-位置关联的学习发生在气味存在的情况下。在随后的睡眠中,在慢波睡眠(SWS)的第一阶段,参与者要么再次看到气味(n = 23),要么收到无味的交通工具(n = 20)。在第一个SWS期(觉醒后)和大约一周后评估记忆保留情况。与实验1一样,相关记忆总体上比不相关记忆保留得更好。然而,TMR对相关记忆和不相关记忆的保留没有差异。这些发现提供了初步证据,表明睡眠对相关记忆的选择性益处会随着时间的推移而发展,但TMR并没有进一步促进这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信