Acupressure and metoclopramide comparison in postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention on laparatomy patients

Ivana Hirš , Anita Lukić , Nina Novak Fumić , Marko Kekić , Jelena Kotaran
{"title":"Acupressure and metoclopramide comparison in postoperative nausea and vomiting prevention on laparatomy patients","authors":"Ivana Hirš ,&nbsp;Anita Lukić ,&nbsp;Nina Novak Fumić ,&nbsp;Marko Kekić ,&nbsp;Jelena Kotaran","doi":"10.1016/j.arthe.2013.10.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p><span>Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting<span> (PONV) ranges from 20 to 30% in, routine procedures, up to 70–80% in high-risk patients. Prevention of PONV is usually based on, antiemetic drugs but pharmacological interventions are only partially effective, so we tested efficiency, of </span></span>acupressure in PONV prevention.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p><span><span><span>We included 180 patients American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification, I and II, who underwent a </span>laparotomy. The study was prospective, and </span>placebo<span> controlled. Nausea and, vomiting were separately monitored on patients with intravenous and epidural analgesia. Patients were allocated in six groups, with 30 patients in each group: group I (epidural analgesia</span></span> <!-->+<!--> <!-->acupressure), group II (epidural analgesia<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->metoclopramide), group III (epidural analgesia<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->sham acupressure), group IV (intravenous analgesia<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->acupressure), group V (intravenous analgesia<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->metoclopramide) and, group VI (intravenous analgesia<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->sham acupressure).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Acupressure reduced PONV from 57 to 37% (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <span>0.001) in patients<span> with intravenous, postoperative analgesia, and from 63 to 20% (</span></span><em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) in patients with epidural postoperative, analgesia compared to placebo. Metoclopramide has also reduced the incidence of PONV from 57 to 40% (<em>P</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.003) in patients with intravenous postoperative analgesia and in patients with epidural, postoperative analgesia from 63 to 17% (<em>P</em> <!-->&lt;<!--> <!-->0.001) compared to placebo.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study confirmed positive effect of acupressure in PONV prevention in patients after, elective laparotomy, regardless of the type of postoperative analgesia, intravenous or epidural. Thus, since acupressure is a simple and inexpensive method of PONV prevention, without side effects, it, should be considered as standard for PONV prevention on laparatomy patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100022,"journal":{"name":"Acupuncture and Related Therapies","volume":"1 4","pages":"Pages 42-45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.arthe.2013.10.001","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acupuncture and Related Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221176601300011X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Objectives

Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) ranges from 20 to 30% in, routine procedures, up to 70–80% in high-risk patients. Prevention of PONV is usually based on, antiemetic drugs but pharmacological interventions are only partially effective, so we tested efficiency, of acupressure in PONV prevention.

Design

We included 180 patients American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status classification, I and II, who underwent a laparotomy. The study was prospective, and placebo controlled. Nausea and, vomiting were separately monitored on patients with intravenous and epidural analgesia. Patients were allocated in six groups, with 30 patients in each group: group I (epidural analgesia + acupressure), group II (epidural analgesia + metoclopramide), group III (epidural analgesia + sham acupressure), group IV (intravenous analgesia + acupressure), group V (intravenous analgesia + metoclopramide) and, group VI (intravenous analgesia + sham acupressure).

Results

Acupressure reduced PONV from 57 to 37% (P < 0.001) in patients with intravenous, postoperative analgesia, and from 63 to 20% (P < 0.001) in patients with epidural postoperative, analgesia compared to placebo. Metoclopramide has also reduced the incidence of PONV from 57 to 40% (P = 0.003) in patients with intravenous postoperative analgesia and in patients with epidural, postoperative analgesia from 63 to 17% (P < 0.001) compared to placebo.

Conclusions

Our study confirmed positive effect of acupressure in PONV prevention in patients after, elective laparotomy, regardless of the type of postoperative analgesia, intravenous or epidural. Thus, since acupressure is a simple and inexpensive method of PONV prevention, without side effects, it, should be considered as standard for PONV prevention on laparatomy patients.

穴位按压与甲氧氯普胺预防腹腔镜手术患者术后恶心呕吐的比较
目的:术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的发生率在常规手术中为20 - 30%,在高危患者中为70-80%。预防PONV通常基于止吐药物,但药物干预仅部分有效,因此我们测试了穴位按压在PONV预防中的有效性。我们纳入180例接受剖腹手术的美国麻醉医师协会生理状态分类I和II患者。该研究是前瞻性的,采用安慰剂对照。分别监测静脉和硬膜外镇痛患者的恶心和呕吐情况。将患者分为6组,每组30例:I组(硬膜外镇痛+穴位按压)、II组(硬膜外镇痛+甲氧氯普胺)、III组(硬膜外镇痛+假穴位按压)、IV组(静脉镇痛+穴位按压)、V组(静脉镇痛+甲氧氯普胺)、VI组(静脉镇痛+假穴位按压)。结果加压使PONV由57%降至37% (P <0.001), 63% ~ 20% (P <在硬膜外术后患者中,与安慰剂相比,镇痛效果更好。甲氧氯普胺还使术后静脉镇痛患者的PONV发生率从57%降低到40% (P = 0.003),硬膜外镇痛患者的PONV发生率从63%降低到17% (P <0.001)。结论我们的研究证实了穴位按压在选择性剖腹手术后预防PONV的积极作用,无论术后镇痛方式是静脉内还是硬膜外。因此,由于穴位按压是一种简单、廉价、无副作用的预防PONV的方法,因此应考虑将其作为预防腹腔镜患者PONV的标准方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信