The Fear of Tautology as Esthetic and Ethic Category

IF 0.2 0 LITERATURE
A. Kovelman
{"title":"The Fear of Tautology as Esthetic and Ethic Category","authors":"A. Kovelman","doi":"10.22455/2500-4247-2022-7-2-10-27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The notion of the “fear of tautology” marks Joseph Brodsky’s poem “Notes of a Fern”: “But evil cannot befall a bad human, and the fear of a tautology is a guarantee of prosperity.” The poet thus inverts Socrates’ assertion that no evil befalls a good person. In the eyes of Brodsky, this assertion represented the epiphany of tautology. His viewpoint was that tautology is squandering one’s life trying to resemble and embrace the appearances and experiences of others. Whereas political and social systems gravitate towards tautology, literature helps one to differentiate himself from the crowd, avoid becoming a “victim of history.” Brodsky’s idea of tautology resonates with those of Mandelstam and Averintsev. Sergey Averinsev described Mandelstam’s dread of confining himself within a religious or ethnic identity as a “profound fear of tautology.” Finally, French philosopher Clément Rosset named tautology “the demon of identity” in the sense of it being sorcery and a magical circle. Advancing upon Rosset’s metaphor, it could be said that the fear of tautology is the desire to break the magical circle and drive the demon of identity into the trap of paradox and irony.","PeriodicalId":41001,"journal":{"name":"Studia Litterarum","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Litterarum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2022-7-2-10-27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The notion of the “fear of tautology” marks Joseph Brodsky’s poem “Notes of a Fern”: “But evil cannot befall a bad human, and the fear of a tautology is a guarantee of prosperity.” The poet thus inverts Socrates’ assertion that no evil befalls a good person. In the eyes of Brodsky, this assertion represented the epiphany of tautology. His viewpoint was that tautology is squandering one’s life trying to resemble and embrace the appearances and experiences of others. Whereas political and social systems gravitate towards tautology, literature helps one to differentiate himself from the crowd, avoid becoming a “victim of history.” Brodsky’s idea of tautology resonates with those of Mandelstam and Averintsev. Sergey Averinsev described Mandelstam’s dread of confining himself within a religious or ethnic identity as a “profound fear of tautology.” Finally, French philosopher Clément Rosset named tautology “the demon of identity” in the sense of it being sorcery and a magical circle. Advancing upon Rosset’s metaphor, it could be said that the fear of tautology is the desire to break the magical circle and drive the demon of identity into the trap of paradox and irony.
作为审美和伦理范畴的对同义重复的恐惧
“对同义重复的恐惧”的概念标志着约瑟夫·布罗茨基的诗《蕨类植物的笔记》:“但邪恶不会降临到坏人身上,对同义重复的恐惧是繁荣的保证。”因此,诗人颠覆了苏格拉底关于好人不会遭殃的论断。在布罗茨基看来,这一论断代表了重言式的顿悟。他的观点是,重复是浪费一个人的生命,试图模仿和拥抱他人的外表和经历。政治和社会制度倾向于同义重复,而文学有助于使人区别于人群,避免成为“历史的受害者”。布罗茨基的同义反复思想与曼德尔施塔姆和阿维林采夫的思想产生了共鸣。谢尔盖·阿维林塞夫(Sergey Averinsev)将曼德尔施塔姆对将自己限制在宗教或种族身份中的恐惧描述为“对同义反复的深刻恐惧”。最后,法国哲学家克莱蒙·罗塞将同义反复称为“身份的恶魔”,因为它是巫术和魔法圈。从罗塞特的比喻出发,我们可以说,对同义重复的恐惧是一种打破魔圈的欲望,是一种将身份的恶魔驱入悖论和反讽的陷阱的欲望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studia Litterarum
Studia Litterarum LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信