Rethinking teaching excellence in Australian higher education

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Trudi Cooper
{"title":"Rethinking teaching excellence in Australian higher education","authors":"Trudi Cooper","doi":"10.1108/IJCED-10-2018-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to explore: why the concept of teaching excellence has been uncritically accepted into the lexicon of university management; and how it has been used to co-opt university teaching staff into supporting the myth that teaching quality can be maintained as financial support for teaching has declined.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper is conceptual and analytical rather than empirical and a critical management perspective is adopted.\n\n\nFindings\nPer capita funding of university teaching has declined steadily. The concept of teaching excellence has been used to distract attention away from discussions about funding and the conditions required to promote good teaching in universities. The construction of teaching excellence as an attribute of individual teachers has co-opted university teachers into supporting the illusion that teaching quality can be maintained, despite falling organisational support and decreased funding.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nTeaching in universities can only be improved through changes to the management approach and maintenance of per capita funding, and ultimately democratisation of universities. This will require changes to the regulatory framework, and national policy.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe author concludes that teaching excellence is unhelpful as a concept. Instead the focus of discussion needs to return to ensuring that the necessary conditions for responsive teaching are in place.\n\n\nSocial implications\nDemocratise the workplace and management methods; adopt matrix management structures; Rebalance to focus on social benefit and public good.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis paper uncovers tensions, contradictions and missing elements in current policy and concludes with suggestions for change.\n","PeriodicalId":51967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Comparative Education and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCED-10-2018-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore: why the concept of teaching excellence has been uncritically accepted into the lexicon of university management; and how it has been used to co-opt university teaching staff into supporting the myth that teaching quality can be maintained as financial support for teaching has declined. Design/methodology/approach This paper is conceptual and analytical rather than empirical and a critical management perspective is adopted. Findings Per capita funding of university teaching has declined steadily. The concept of teaching excellence has been used to distract attention away from discussions about funding and the conditions required to promote good teaching in universities. The construction of teaching excellence as an attribute of individual teachers has co-opted university teachers into supporting the illusion that teaching quality can be maintained, despite falling organisational support and decreased funding. Research limitations/implications Teaching in universities can only be improved through changes to the management approach and maintenance of per capita funding, and ultimately democratisation of universities. This will require changes to the regulatory framework, and national policy. Practical implications The author concludes that teaching excellence is unhelpful as a concept. Instead the focus of discussion needs to return to ensuring that the necessary conditions for responsive teaching are in place. Social implications Democratise the workplace and management methods; adopt matrix management structures; Rebalance to focus on social benefit and public good. Originality/value This paper uncovers tensions, contradictions and missing elements in current policy and concludes with suggestions for change.
反思澳大利亚高等教育的卓越教学
本文的目的是探讨:为什么卓越教学的概念被不加批判地接受到大学管理的词汇中;以及它是如何被用来拉拢大学教学人员,以支持教学质量可以在教学财政支持下降的情况下保持不变的神话。设计/方法/方法本文是概念性和分析性的,而不是经验性的,采用了批判性的管理观点。大学教学的人均经费稳步下降。卓越教学的概念已经被用来转移人们对资金和促进大学良好教学所需条件的讨论的注意力。将教学卓越作为教师个人的一种属性,这使得大学教师们陷入了一种错觉,即尽管组织支持和资金减少,教学质量仍然可以保持。研究限制/影响大学的教学只能通过改变管理方法和维持人均经费,并最终使大学民主化来改善。这需要改变监管框架和国家政策。作者的结论是,卓越教学作为一个概念是没有帮助的。相反,讨论的焦点需要回到确保响应式教学的必要条件。社会影响使工作场所和管理方法民主化;采用矩阵式管理结构;再平衡,注重社会效益和公共利益。原创性/价值本文揭示了当前政策中的紧张、矛盾和缺失因素,并提出了变革建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信