Related risk factors for progressive occlusion of intracranial aneurysms treated with low-profile visualized intraluminal support device stent in mid-term follow up

Q4 Medicine
Linchun Huan, Yunshuai Sun, Hao Zhang, Jianjun Yu, Feng Guo, Jing Cai, Yu-Hui Liu, Shi-Lian Wang
{"title":"Related risk factors for progressive occlusion of intracranial aneurysms treated with low-profile visualized intraluminal support device stent in mid-term follow up","authors":"Linchun Huan, Yunshuai Sun, Hao Zhang, Jianjun Yu, Feng Guo, Jing Cai, Yu-Hui Liu, Shi-Lian Wang","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-8925.2019.12.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo analyze the angiographic results of intracranial aneurysms without complete embolization immediately after low-profile visualized intraluminal support device (LVIS) stent at mid-term follow up, and explore the risk factors for healing of partial occluded aneurysms. \n \n \nMethods \nOne hundred and sixty-one patients with intracranial aneurysms treated by LVIS stent embolization in our hospital from December 2014 to December 2018 were selected; 193 aneurysms in total, including 93 un-ruptured aneurysms and 100 ruptured aneurysms, were noted. DSA was performed immediately after operation to evaluate the degrees of aneurysm embolization according to Raymond grading criteria. The embolization degrees of aneurysms were compared at 8 months after surgery and immediately after surgery, and the healing of aneurysms (Raymond grading 1) was calculated. Univariate Logistic regression analysis and multivariate Logistic regression analysis (forward maximum likelihood ratio method) were used to screen the risk factors for healing of incomplete aneurysm embolization. \n \n \nResults \nThe embolization degrees immediately after surgery were as follows: 78 were with Raymond grading 1, 54 with Raymond grading 2, and 61 with Raymond grading 3; complete aneurysm embolization were noted in 78 aneurysms (40.41%) and incomplete aneurysm embolization were noted in 115 (59.59%). Follow up (8 months after surgery) results indicated that, of the 193 aneurysms, 171 were with Raymond grading 1, 10 with Raymond grading 2, and 12 with Raymond grading 3; there were 171 aneurysms (88.60%) having complete aneurysm embolization and 22 (11.40%) having incomplete aneurysm embolization. In the aneurysms having incomplete aneurysm embolization immediately after surgery, the healing rate was 81.74% (94/115). Univariate Logistic regression analysis showed that hypertension, diabetes mellitus, posterior circulation aneurysm, dissecting aneurysm, body-neck ratio and embolization degrees immediately after surgery were risk factors for healing of aneurysms (P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that posterior circulation aneurysm and diabetes mellitus were independent risk factors for healing of aneurysms (P<0.05). The area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curve of the regression model was 0.755, indicating that the prediction efficiency of the regression model was moderate. \n \n \nConclusion \nTreatment of intracranial aneurysms with LVIS stent is effective, and the complete occlusion rate is high, even in the aneurysms with incomplete embolization immediately after surgery; aneurysms located in the posterior circulation and associated with diabetes can affect the treatment of aneurysms. \n \n \nKey words: \nIntracranial aneurysm; Endovascular treatment; LVIS stent; Embolization","PeriodicalId":10104,"journal":{"name":"中华神经医学杂志","volume":"48 1","pages":"1229-1235"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华神经医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1671-8925.2019.12.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To analyze the angiographic results of intracranial aneurysms without complete embolization immediately after low-profile visualized intraluminal support device (LVIS) stent at mid-term follow up, and explore the risk factors for healing of partial occluded aneurysms. Methods One hundred and sixty-one patients with intracranial aneurysms treated by LVIS stent embolization in our hospital from December 2014 to December 2018 were selected; 193 aneurysms in total, including 93 un-ruptured aneurysms and 100 ruptured aneurysms, were noted. DSA was performed immediately after operation to evaluate the degrees of aneurysm embolization according to Raymond grading criteria. The embolization degrees of aneurysms were compared at 8 months after surgery and immediately after surgery, and the healing of aneurysms (Raymond grading 1) was calculated. Univariate Logistic regression analysis and multivariate Logistic regression analysis (forward maximum likelihood ratio method) were used to screen the risk factors for healing of incomplete aneurysm embolization. Results The embolization degrees immediately after surgery were as follows: 78 were with Raymond grading 1, 54 with Raymond grading 2, and 61 with Raymond grading 3; complete aneurysm embolization were noted in 78 aneurysms (40.41%) and incomplete aneurysm embolization were noted in 115 (59.59%). Follow up (8 months after surgery) results indicated that, of the 193 aneurysms, 171 were with Raymond grading 1, 10 with Raymond grading 2, and 12 with Raymond grading 3; there were 171 aneurysms (88.60%) having complete aneurysm embolization and 22 (11.40%) having incomplete aneurysm embolization. In the aneurysms having incomplete aneurysm embolization immediately after surgery, the healing rate was 81.74% (94/115). Univariate Logistic regression analysis showed that hypertension, diabetes mellitus, posterior circulation aneurysm, dissecting aneurysm, body-neck ratio and embolization degrees immediately after surgery were risk factors for healing of aneurysms (P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis revealed that posterior circulation aneurysm and diabetes mellitus were independent risk factors for healing of aneurysms (P<0.05). The area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic curve of the regression model was 0.755, indicating that the prediction efficiency of the regression model was moderate. Conclusion Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with LVIS stent is effective, and the complete occlusion rate is high, even in the aneurysms with incomplete embolization immediately after surgery; aneurysms located in the posterior circulation and associated with diabetes can affect the treatment of aneurysms. Key words: Intracranial aneurysm; Endovascular treatment; LVIS stent; Embolization
颅内动脉瘤进行性闭塞应用低侧显像腔内支架治疗中期随访的相关危险因素分析
目的分析低侧可视化腔内支撑装置(LVIS)支架术后未立即完全栓塞的颅内动脉瘤中期随访血管造影结果,探讨部分闭塞动脉瘤愈合的危险因素。方法选取2014年12月至2018年12月在我院行LVIS支架栓塞治疗的颅内动脉瘤患者161例;共发现193个动脉瘤,其中未破裂动脉瘤93个,破裂动脉瘤100个。术后立即行DSA,根据Raymond分级标准评估动脉瘤栓塞程度。比较术后8个月和术后即刻动脉瘤的栓塞程度,并计算动脉瘤的愈合情况(Raymond分级1)。采用单因素Logistic回归分析和多因素Logistic回归分析(正向最大似然比法)筛选不完全动脉瘤栓塞愈合的危险因素。结果术后即刻栓塞程度:1级78例,2级54例,3级61例;完全栓塞78例(40.41%),不完全栓塞115例(59.59%)。术后8个月随访结果显示,193个动脉瘤中,Raymond分级1级171个,Raymond分级2级10个,Raymond分级3级12个;动脉瘤完全栓塞171例(88.60%),不完全栓塞22例(11.40%)。术后立即栓塞不完全的动脉瘤,治愈率为81.74%(94/115)。单因素Logistic回归分析显示,高血压、糖尿病、后循环动脉瘤、夹层动脉瘤、体颈比、术后即刻栓塞程度是影响动脉瘤愈合的危险因素(P<0.05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示后循环动脉瘤和糖尿病是动脉瘤愈合的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。回归模型的受试者工作特征曲线曲线下面积为0.755,表明回归模型的预测效率为中等。结论LVIS支架治疗颅内动脉瘤是有效的,即使在术后立即栓塞不完全的动脉瘤中,完全闭塞率也很高;位于后循环并与糖尿病相关的动脉瘤会影响动脉瘤的治疗。关键词:颅内动脉瘤;血管内治疗;LVIS支架;栓塞
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中华神经医学杂志
中华神经医学杂志 Psychology-Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6272
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信