“That’s the Price You Pay”: Muscovites’ Understandings of Ecological Health Risks (in the Context of the Oncological Threat)

D. Lebedeva
{"title":"“That’s the Price You Pay”: Muscovites’ Understandings of Ecological Health Risks (in the Context of the Oncological Threat)","authors":"D. Lebedeva","doi":"10.19181/inter.2022.14.2.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oncological diseases are in a special focus of social policy programmes. They are multifactorial, attributable to individuals’ lifestyle, genetic predispositions, and the external environmental factors. In the Russian healthcare system, the attempts to build a model of individual rational responsibility of individuals for themselves and for their health were being made, while sufficient institutional conditions that would allow citizens to implement the patterns of self-preservation behavior of developed countries are not fully provided. The environment, being one of the systemic factors of health, depends on infrastructural, economic, political prerequisites. At the same time, it requires a proactive subject that uses structural opportunities to manifest one’s agency. Thus, using the example of oncological diseases and their link with the environmental conditions, we aim to identify individuals’ attitudes to health and agency in selfcare. Based on the theoretical premises of interconnection between structure and agency, this study addresses the justifications that individuals apply to their health-preservation practices and oncological risks in connection with the quality of the environment or lack thereof. We take Muscovites as an example since they are the residents of a metropolis who, on the one hand, are prone to greater environmental health risks, especially in the long term, but, on the other hand, have greater access to healthcare and diagnostics.Based on the materials of 39 in-depth interviews, we conclude that environmental conditions are perceived by Muscovites as a significant factor in health, however, currently, environmental risks are insufficiently perceived as individual responsibility and an encouragement for personal proactivity. We suggest that a refusal to take a proactive position about cancer risks due to environmental factors turns is a locally rational strategy of Muscovites. Thus, Muscovites are characterized by an industrial type of self-care, in which health has a utilitarian value and is considered a ‘price’ for the benefits of an urban lifestyle, for industrialization and self-realization. Yet, Muscovites, in our opinion, would be ready to respond to environmental institutional changes.","PeriodicalId":81563,"journal":{"name":"Inter-Nord","volume":"184 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inter-Nord","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19181/inter.2022.14.2.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Oncological diseases are in a special focus of social policy programmes. They are multifactorial, attributable to individuals’ lifestyle, genetic predispositions, and the external environmental factors. In the Russian healthcare system, the attempts to build a model of individual rational responsibility of individuals for themselves and for their health were being made, while sufficient institutional conditions that would allow citizens to implement the patterns of self-preservation behavior of developed countries are not fully provided. The environment, being one of the systemic factors of health, depends on infrastructural, economic, political prerequisites. At the same time, it requires a proactive subject that uses structural opportunities to manifest one’s agency. Thus, using the example of oncological diseases and their link with the environmental conditions, we aim to identify individuals’ attitudes to health and agency in selfcare. Based on the theoretical premises of interconnection between structure and agency, this study addresses the justifications that individuals apply to their health-preservation practices and oncological risks in connection with the quality of the environment or lack thereof. We take Muscovites as an example since they are the residents of a metropolis who, on the one hand, are prone to greater environmental health risks, especially in the long term, but, on the other hand, have greater access to healthcare and diagnostics.Based on the materials of 39 in-depth interviews, we conclude that environmental conditions are perceived by Muscovites as a significant factor in health, however, currently, environmental risks are insufficiently perceived as individual responsibility and an encouragement for personal proactivity. We suggest that a refusal to take a proactive position about cancer risks due to environmental factors turns is a locally rational strategy of Muscovites. Thus, Muscovites are characterized by an industrial type of self-care, in which health has a utilitarian value and is considered a ‘price’ for the benefits of an urban lifestyle, for industrialization and self-realization. Yet, Muscovites, in our opinion, would be ready to respond to environmental institutional changes.
“这是你付出的代价”:莫斯科人对生态健康风险的理解(在肿瘤威胁的背景下)
肿瘤疾病是社会政策方案的特别重点。它们是多因素的,可归因于个人的生活方式、遗传倾向和外部环境因素。在俄罗斯的医疗保健系统中,正在尝试建立一种个人对自己和自己的健康负责的个人理性模式,而没有充分提供足够的制度条件,使公民能够实施发达国家的自我保护行为模式。环境作为健康的系统性因素之一,取决于基础设施、经济和政治先决条件。同时,它需要一个主动的主体,利用结构性的机会来表现自己的能动性。因此,以肿瘤疾病及其与环境条件的联系为例,我们旨在确定个人对健康的态度和自我保健的代理。基于结构与能动性相互联系的理论前提,本研究探讨了个体在与环境质量或缺乏环境质量相关的健康保护实践和肿瘤风险方面的理由。我们以莫斯科人为例,因为他们是大都市的居民,一方面,特别是从长期来看,他们容易面临更大的环境健康风险,但另一方面,他们有更多的机会获得医疗保健和诊断。根据39次深度访谈的材料,我们得出结论,环境条件被莫斯科人视为健康的一个重要因素,然而,目前,环境风险没有充分被视为个人责任和鼓励个人主动性。我们认为,由于环境因素而拒绝对癌症风险采取积极主动的立场是莫斯科人的一种局部理性策略。因此,莫斯科人的特点是工业化类型的自我保健,其中健康具有实用价值,被认为是城市生活方式、工业化和自我实现的好处的“代价”。然而,我们认为,莫斯科人将准备对环境体制变化作出反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信