Analysis of Prospective Physics Teacher's Misconceptions on Interference Material using Certainty of Response Index (CRI)

Andhiani Eka Kusumawati, Wulan Anggraini, B. Setiaji
{"title":"Analysis of Prospective Physics Teacher's Misconceptions on Interference Material using Certainty of Response Index (CRI)","authors":"Andhiani Eka Kusumawati, Wulan Anggraini, B. Setiaji","doi":"10.29303/jpft.v8i1.3679","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this research is to find out the occurrence of misconceptions in students regarding the concept of light interference and to find out the causes of these misconceptions. The research was conducted in the form of a three-tier multiple-choice test and analyzed using the Certain of Response Index (CRI) method which will be a benchmark in the level of confidence in answering a question. The research was conducted on 21 undergraduate students of UNY Physics with light interference material. From this study, it was shown that the level of conceptual understanding of undergraduate students in Physics at UNY on light interference was included in the category of not understanding concepts at 46.91%, understanding concepts at 36.12%, and misconceptions at 17.07%. The results of the level of misconceptions obtained are low. This is caused by a conceptual error that is owned by students and the application of concepts that do not match the statements given.","PeriodicalId":34735,"journal":{"name":"JPFT Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JPFT Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v8i1.3679","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to find out the occurrence of misconceptions in students regarding the concept of light interference and to find out the causes of these misconceptions. The research was conducted in the form of a three-tier multiple-choice test and analyzed using the Certain of Response Index (CRI) method which will be a benchmark in the level of confidence in answering a question. The research was conducted on 21 undergraduate students of UNY Physics with light interference material. From this study, it was shown that the level of conceptual understanding of undergraduate students in Physics at UNY on light interference was included in the category of not understanding concepts at 46.91%, understanding concepts at 36.12%, and misconceptions at 17.07%. The results of the level of misconceptions obtained are low. This is caused by a conceptual error that is owned by students and the application of concepts that do not match the statements given.
用响应指数确定性分析准物理教师对干扰材料的误解
本研究的目的是了解学生对光干涉概念的误解发生情况,并找出产生这些误解的原因。该研究以三层选择题的形式进行,并使用反应指数确定度(CRI)方法进行分析,该方法将成为回答问题的信心水平的基准。本研究采用光干涉材料对21名纽约大学物理系本科生进行了实验。本研究结果表明,纽约大学物理系本科生对光干涉的概念理解水平为不理解概念占46.91%,理解概念占36.12%,误解占17.07%。所获得的误解程度的结果很低。这是由学生自己的概念错误和概念的应用与所给出的陈述不匹配引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信