Snapshot of resistance and virulence features in ESCAPE strains frequently isolated from surgical wound infections in a Romanian hospital

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Sajjad Mohsin I Rayyif, Wathek N. Alwan, H. Mohammed, I. Barbu, A. Holban, I. Gheorghe, O. Banu, O. Shalal, M. Chifiriuc, G. Mihăescu
{"title":"Snapshot of resistance and virulence features in ESCAPE strains frequently isolated from surgical wound infections in a Romanian hospital","authors":"Sajjad Mohsin I Rayyif, Wathek N. Alwan, H. Mohammed, I. Barbu, A. Holban, I. Gheorghe, O. Banu, O. Shalal, M. Chifiriuc, G. Mihăescu","doi":"10.2478/rrlm-2022-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the phenotypic features (adherence, biofilm formation, virulence, antibiotic susceptibility) and the genetic background of antibiotic resistance in nosocomial ESCAPE strains consecutively isolated from surgical wound infections in hospitalized patients. Methods: 86 bacterial strains consecutively isolated from various wound infections were analysed by their antibiotic resistance (antibiotic susceptibility testing and PCR for certain antibiotic resistance genes), virulence, biofilm formation and cellular adherence. Results: The bacterial isolates were identified as: Enterobacterales (n = 39) including Escherichia coli (n = 9), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 14) Proteus mirabilis (n = 7), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (n = 26) and Enterococcus faecalis (n = 20). Compared to other isolates, S. aureus strains exhibited the highest capacity to produce soluble virulence factors and to develop biofilms in vitro, with significant differences between methicillin resistant and methicillin susceptible isolates. Among enterobacterial isolates, K. pneumoniae strains expressed the highest capacity to develop biofilms. The assessment of bacterial adherence to HeLa cells revealed that all bacterial strains adhered to the cellular substrata, showing various adherence patterns. E. faecalis strains exhibited a low soluble virulence factors profile, a lower capacity to adhere to epithelial cells and to develop biofilms. Conclusions: The present study could contribute to the understanding of the pathology of infected wounds, depending on the etio-logical agents, providing data with positive impact on the therapeutic management of surgical wounds infections.","PeriodicalId":49599,"journal":{"name":"Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator","volume":"17 1","pages":"215 - 226"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rrlm-2022-0014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the phenotypic features (adherence, biofilm formation, virulence, antibiotic susceptibility) and the genetic background of antibiotic resistance in nosocomial ESCAPE strains consecutively isolated from surgical wound infections in hospitalized patients. Methods: 86 bacterial strains consecutively isolated from various wound infections were analysed by their antibiotic resistance (antibiotic susceptibility testing and PCR for certain antibiotic resistance genes), virulence, biofilm formation and cellular adherence. Results: The bacterial isolates were identified as: Enterobacterales (n = 39) including Escherichia coli (n = 9), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 14) Proteus mirabilis (n = 7), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (n = 26) and Enterococcus faecalis (n = 20). Compared to other isolates, S. aureus strains exhibited the highest capacity to produce soluble virulence factors and to develop biofilms in vitro, with significant differences between methicillin resistant and methicillin susceptible isolates. Among enterobacterial isolates, K. pneumoniae strains expressed the highest capacity to develop biofilms. The assessment of bacterial adherence to HeLa cells revealed that all bacterial strains adhered to the cellular substrata, showing various adherence patterns. E. faecalis strains exhibited a low soluble virulence factors profile, a lower capacity to adhere to epithelial cells and to develop biofilms. Conclusions: The present study could contribute to the understanding of the pathology of infected wounds, depending on the etio-logical agents, providing data with positive impact on the therapeutic management of surgical wounds infections.
罗马尼亚一家医院外科伤口感染中经常分离的ESCAPE菌株的耐药性和毒力特征快照
摘要背景:本研究旨在探讨住院患者外科伤口感染中连续分离的院内ESCAPE菌株的表型特征(粘附性、生物膜形成、毒力、抗生素敏感性)和抗生素耐药的遗传背景。方法:对连续分离的86株不同类型创面感染细菌进行耐药性(药敏试验和部分耐药基因PCR)、毒力、生物膜形成和细胞粘附性分析。结果:分离到的细菌有:肠杆菌39门,其中大肠杆菌9门,肺炎克雷伯菌14门,奇异变形杆菌7门,金黄色葡萄球菌26门,粪肠球菌20门。与其他菌株相比,金黄色葡萄球菌菌株在体外产生可溶性毒力因子和形成生物膜的能力最高,甲氧西林耐药菌株和甲氧西林敏感菌株之间存在显著差异。在分离的肠杆菌中,肺炎克雷伯菌菌株表现出最高的生物膜发育能力。细菌对HeLa细胞的粘附评估显示,所有菌株都粘附在细胞基质上,并表现出不同的粘附模式。粪肠球菌菌株表现出低可溶性毒力因子特征,粘附上皮细胞和形成生物膜的能力较低。结论:本研究有助于了解伤口感染的病理机制,为外科伤口感染的治疗管理提供积极的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator
Revista Romana De Medicina De Laborator MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
0.31
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to publish new information that would lead to a better understanding of biological mechanisms of production of human diseases, their prevention and diagnosis as early as possible and to monitor therapy and the development of the health of patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信