Will consumers pay more for organic logo: an empirical study of organic products purchasing in Thailand

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Waripas Jiumpanyarach
{"title":"Will consumers pay more for organic logo: an empirical study of organic products purchasing in Thailand","authors":"Waripas Jiumpanyarach","doi":"10.33687/ijae.010.03.3926","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the willingness to pay for the quality of agricultural products toward the logo of consumers in different regions of Thailand and explained an opportunity for organic products in future markets. 408 respondents from February – June 2019 were collected based on paper-based questionnaires that focused on consumers’ choices, recognition, and attitudes regarding safety and organic knowledge. Three hypotheses were in this study. A choice experiment logit model was used. The questions included socioeconomic, attitudes, preferences, perception of safety and organic products related to logo. The study showed respondents who understood in the concept of safety and organic agriculture and had information logo standards tended to purchase organic products. The organic logo has impacted the purchasing power of respondents. Consumers were willing to pay more for third-party certified logo products (Organic Thailand and IFOAM) rather than local logos (PGS). Satisfaction with marketing, quality standard, and prices did not increase consumers’ demand while they pay for higher prices based on their interest and understanding. Consumers were willing to trade off between trusted logos and a higher price. The supported knowledge on production and markets from public and private agencies were beneficial along the supply and demand chain and agricultural society. To enlarge the organic product markets in the future, these are not well-researched factors that impact third-party and local logos. There were several studies about the perception levels, interest, understanding, and knowledge of the respondents’ impact on the purchasing power of organic products in Thailand. ","PeriodicalId":52390,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agricultural Extension","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agricultural Extension","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33687/ijae.010.03.3926","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the willingness to pay for the quality of agricultural products toward the logo of consumers in different regions of Thailand and explained an opportunity for organic products in future markets. 408 respondents from February – June 2019 were collected based on paper-based questionnaires that focused on consumers’ choices, recognition, and attitudes regarding safety and organic knowledge. Three hypotheses were in this study. A choice experiment logit model was used. The questions included socioeconomic, attitudes, preferences, perception of safety and organic products related to logo. The study showed respondents who understood in the concept of safety and organic agriculture and had information logo standards tended to purchase organic products. The organic logo has impacted the purchasing power of respondents. Consumers were willing to pay more for third-party certified logo products (Organic Thailand and IFOAM) rather than local logos (PGS). Satisfaction with marketing, quality standard, and prices did not increase consumers’ demand while they pay for higher prices based on their interest and understanding. Consumers were willing to trade off between trusted logos and a higher price. The supported knowledge on production and markets from public and private agencies were beneficial along the supply and demand chain and agricultural society. To enlarge the organic product markets in the future, these are not well-researched factors that impact third-party and local logos. There were several studies about the perception levels, interest, understanding, and knowledge of the respondents’ impact on the purchasing power of organic products in Thailand. 
消费者是否会为有机标识支付更多费用:泰国有机产品购买的实证研究
本研究旨在调查泰国不同地区的消费者对农产品质量与标志的支付意愿之间的关系,并解释有机产品在未来市场的机会。2019年2月至6月,我们通过纸质调查问卷收集了408名受访者,调查重点是消费者对安全和有机知识的选择、认可和态度。这项研究中有三个假设。采用选择实验logit模型。这些问题包括社会经济、态度、偏好、对安全的看法以及与标识相关的有机产品。研究表明,了解安全概念和有机农业,并有信息标识标准的受访者倾向于购买有机产品。有机标志影响了受访者的购买力。消费者愿意花更多的钱购买第三方认证的标识产品(如Organic Thailand和IFOAM),而不是本地标识(PGS)。对营销、质量标准和价格的满意并没有增加消费者的需求,他们会基于自己的兴趣和理解而支付更高的价格。消费者愿意在值得信赖的商标和更高的价格之间进行权衡。公共和私人机构提供的生产和市场知识对整个供需链和农业社会都是有益的。为了在未来扩大有机产品市场,这些影响第三方和本地标识的因素尚未得到充分研究。有几项研究关于感知水平,兴趣,理解和知识的受访者对泰国有机产品的购买力的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Agricultural Extension
International Journal of Agricultural Extension Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信