{"title":"Contentious Actions and Communication for Social Change: The Public Hearing (Jan Sunwai) as Process","authors":"Pradip Ninan Thomas","doi":"10.1111/jcom.12301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores the relationship between ‘contentious actions’ and communication processes in communication for social change (CSC) theory. Beginning with an analysis of the contributions made by Charles Tilly to the understanding of the methods and repertoires of popular protest and E. P. Thompson's interpretation of the moral economy of protests, it explores the history of contentious action in India, before focusing on the empowerment potential of the ‘Public Hearing’ as contentious action, specifically in the context of the Right to Information Movement in India. It argues that contentious actions such as public hearings need to become a focus for study in CSC theory precisely because it contributes to the validation of Voice, and to individual and collective empowerment.</p>","PeriodicalId":48410,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication","volume":"67 5","pages":"719-732"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/jcom.12301","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcom.12301","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
Abstract
This article explores the relationship between ‘contentious actions’ and communication processes in communication for social change (CSC) theory. Beginning with an analysis of the contributions made by Charles Tilly to the understanding of the methods and repertoires of popular protest and E. P. Thompson's interpretation of the moral economy of protests, it explores the history of contentious action in India, before focusing on the empowerment potential of the ‘Public Hearing’ as contentious action, specifically in the context of the Right to Information Movement in India. It argues that contentious actions such as public hearings need to become a focus for study in CSC theory precisely because it contributes to the validation of Voice, and to individual and collective empowerment.
本文探讨了社会变革传播理论中“争议行为”与传播过程之间的关系。本文首先分析了查尔斯·蒂利(Charles Tilly)对大众抗议的方法和手段的理解所做的贡献,以及e.p.汤普森(E. P. Thompson)对抗议的道德经济学的解释,然后探讨了印度争议性行动的历史,然后重点研究了“公开听证会”作为争议性行动的赋权潜力,特别是在印度信息权运动的背景下。本文认为,公众听证会等争议性行为需要成为CSC理论研究的重点,正是因为它有助于声音的验证,以及个人和集体的赋权。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Communication, the flagship journal of the International Communication Association, is a vital publication for communication specialists and policymakers alike. Focusing on communication research, practice, policy, and theory, it delivers the latest and most significant findings in communication studies. The journal also includes an extensive book review section and symposia of selected studies on current issues. JoC publishes top-quality scholarship on all aspects of communication, with a particular interest in research that transcends disciplinary and sub-field boundaries.