The Stone Guest. The Soviet Rediscovery of Formal Linguistics Towards the Early Chomsky

IF 0.1 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
V. Tomelleri, M. Biasio
{"title":"The Stone Guest. The Soviet Rediscovery of Formal Linguistics Towards the Early Chomsky","authors":"V. Tomelleri, M. Biasio","doi":"10.36253/studi_slavis-12563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After Stalin’s death, Soviet linguistics seemingly steered in a new direction, enthusiastically adopting mathematical methods within the upsurge of interest in machine translation. This fostered the acceptance of formal models disjointed from the rigid dictates of dialectical materialism and paved the way for the rediscovery of the scientific legacy of (post-)structuralist Euroamerican schools. In the eyes of the protagonists of this epistemological change, linguistics seemed to be freed from the traditional methodological constraints imposed by philology and literature. This short-lived yet intense period, however, is characterized by the polyphonic coexistence of several ideas and personalities, whose research activity can be properly understood and evaluated only from a broader historical perspective, encompassing both earlier and later stages, thus substantially curtailing the explanatory power of historical and thematic periodization. The study aims at examining the salient characteristics of the scientific environment surrounding the early critical reception of Noam Chomsky’s Syntactic Structures in the Soviet Union. By tackling specific terminological and epistemological issues, it is argued that the evolution of Soviet linguistics was not defined by abrupt saltational processes, but rather by a constant pendular oscillation which – depending on cultural, political, and historical circumstances – would grant temporary priority to some scientific approaches and orientations at the expense of others.","PeriodicalId":41566,"journal":{"name":"Studi Slavistici","volume":"118 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studi Slavistici","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36253/studi_slavis-12563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After Stalin’s death, Soviet linguistics seemingly steered in a new direction, enthusiastically adopting mathematical methods within the upsurge of interest in machine translation. This fostered the acceptance of formal models disjointed from the rigid dictates of dialectical materialism and paved the way for the rediscovery of the scientific legacy of (post-)structuralist Euroamerican schools. In the eyes of the protagonists of this epistemological change, linguistics seemed to be freed from the traditional methodological constraints imposed by philology and literature. This short-lived yet intense period, however, is characterized by the polyphonic coexistence of several ideas and personalities, whose research activity can be properly understood and evaluated only from a broader historical perspective, encompassing both earlier and later stages, thus substantially curtailing the explanatory power of historical and thematic periodization. The study aims at examining the salient characteristics of the scientific environment surrounding the early critical reception of Noam Chomsky’s Syntactic Structures in the Soviet Union. By tackling specific terminological and epistemological issues, it is argued that the evolution of Soviet linguistics was not defined by abrupt saltational processes, but rather by a constant pendular oscillation which – depending on cultural, political, and historical circumstances – would grant temporary priority to some scientific approaches and orientations at the expense of others.
石头客人。苏联形式语言学对早期乔姆斯基的再发现
斯大林死后,苏联语言学似乎转向了一个新的方向,在机器翻译热潮中热情地采用数学方法。这促进了与辩证唯物主义的严格规定脱节的正式模型的接受,并为重新发现(后)结构主义欧美学派的科学遗产铺平了道路。在这场认识论变革的倡导者眼中,语言学似乎摆脱了文献学和文学所施加的传统方法论约束。然而,这一短暂而激烈的时期的特点是多种思想和个性的复调共存,其研究活动只能从更广泛的历史角度来正确理解和评估,包括早期和后期阶段,从而大大削弱了历史和主题分期的解释力。本研究旨在考察苏联早期对诺姆·乔姆斯基《句法结构》的批判接受的科学环境的显著特征。通过处理特定的术语和认识论问题,作者认为苏联语言学的演变不是由突然的salsalak过程定义的,而是由一个不断的钟摆振荡定义的,这个振荡取决于文化、政治和历史环境,它会以牺牲其他科学方法和方向为代价,暂时优先考虑一些科学方法和方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studi Slavistici
Studi Slavistici HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信