Length of Stay Comparison between Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in the Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism: Results from a Real-World Observational Cohort Study

Thrombosis Pub Date : 2015-12-31 DOI:10.1155/2015/414523
K. Roberts, Tamara B Knight, Eimeira Padilla-Tolentino, Manasa S. Murthy, Evan J. Peterson
{"title":"Length of Stay Comparison between Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in the Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism: Results from a Real-World Observational Cohort Study","authors":"K. Roberts, Tamara B Knight, Eimeira Padilla-Tolentino, Manasa S. Murthy, Evan J. Peterson","doi":"10.1155/2015/414523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Trials have shown that novel oral anticoagulants may decrease length of stay versus warfarin. A comparison of length of stay in the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE) has not been performed outside post hoc analysis of a large clinical trial. Objective. To evaluate if rivaroxaban decreases length of stay compared to warfarin plus enoxaparin in the treatment of PE. Methods. This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study. Patients were identified based on discharge diagnosis of PE and were excluded if they received anticoagulants prior to admission and had additional indications for anticoagulation or reduced creatinine clearance. The primary endpoint was length of stay. Secondary endpoints included time from initial dose of oral anticoagulant to discharge and length of stay comparison between subgroups. Results. Inclusion criterion was met by 158 patients (82 warfarin, 76 rivaroxaban). The median length of stay was 4.5 days (interquartile range [IQR], 2.7, 5.9) in the warfarin group and 1.8 days (IQR, 1.2, 3.7) in the rivaroxaban group (P < 0.001). Time interval from first dose of oral anticoagulant to discharge was shorter with rivaroxaban (P < 0.001). Conclusions. Patients given rivaroxaban had decreased length of stay versus those given warfarin plus enoxaparin for the treatment of PE.","PeriodicalId":75222,"journal":{"name":"Thrombosis","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thrombosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/414523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Background. Trials have shown that novel oral anticoagulants may decrease length of stay versus warfarin. A comparison of length of stay in the treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE) has not been performed outside post hoc analysis of a large clinical trial. Objective. To evaluate if rivaroxaban decreases length of stay compared to warfarin plus enoxaparin in the treatment of PE. Methods. This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study. Patients were identified based on discharge diagnosis of PE and were excluded if they received anticoagulants prior to admission and had additional indications for anticoagulation or reduced creatinine clearance. The primary endpoint was length of stay. Secondary endpoints included time from initial dose of oral anticoagulant to discharge and length of stay comparison between subgroups. Results. Inclusion criterion was met by 158 patients (82 warfarin, 76 rivaroxaban). The median length of stay was 4.5 days (interquartile range [IQR], 2.7, 5.9) in the warfarin group and 1.8 days (IQR, 1.2, 3.7) in the rivaroxaban group (P < 0.001). Time interval from first dose of oral anticoagulant to discharge was shorter with rivaroxaban (P < 0.001). Conclusions. Patients given rivaroxaban had decreased length of stay versus those given warfarin plus enoxaparin for the treatment of PE.
利伐沙班和华法林治疗肺栓塞的住院时间比较:来自真实世界观察队列研究的结果
背景。试验表明,与华法林相比,新型口服抗凝剂可缩短住院时间。除了对一项大型临床试验的事后分析外,还没有对肺栓塞(PE)治疗的住院时间进行比较。目标。评价与华法林加依诺肝素治疗PE相比,利伐沙班是否能缩短住院时间。方法。这是一项多中心、回顾性、观察性队列研究。根据PE的出院诊断确定患者,如果在入院前接受了抗凝治疗,并且有其他抗凝指征或肌酐清除率降低,则排除患者。主要终点是住院时间。次要终点包括从口服抗凝剂初始剂量到出院的时间和亚组间住院时间的比较。结果。158例患者符合纳入标准(华法林82例,利伐沙班76例)。华法林组的中位住院时间为4.5天(四分位数间距[IQR], 2.7, 5.9),利伐沙班组的中位住院时间为1.8天(IQR, 1.2, 3.7) (P < 0.001)。利伐沙班组口服抗凝剂首次给药至出院的时间间隔较短(P < 0.001)。结论。服用利伐沙班的患者与服用华法林加依诺肝素治疗PE的患者相比,住院时间缩短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信