Influence of personality and emotional competences on academic performance: direct and indirect pathways mediated by perceived stress.

IF 1 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Current Issues in Personality Psychology Pub Date : 2021-12-12 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.5114/cipp.2021.111423
Min You, Sylvain Laborde, Robert Samuel Vaughan, Agnès Salinas
{"title":"Influence of personality and emotional competences on academic performance: direct and indirect pathways mediated by perceived stress.","authors":"Min You, Sylvain Laborde, Robert Samuel Vaughan, Agnès Salinas","doi":"10.5114/cipp.2021.111423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Among the factors influencing academic performance (AP), individual differences at the trait level such as personality and emotional competences (EC) have been found to play a critical role, similarly to state variables such as perceived stress (PS).</p><p><strong>Participants and procedure: </strong>The aim of this study was to clarify whether the influence of personality (Big Five) and EC on AP (general point average) is direct and/or mediated via PS. 537 undergraduate students from a French university (112 male and 425 female, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 19.84 years, <i>SD</i><sub>age</sub> = 1.74 years, range = 18-30 years; first year: <i>n</i> = 293, 55%; second year: <i>n</i> = 162, 30%, third year: <i>n</i> = 82, 15%) filled out the test battery around three weeks before the final examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Path analysis showed that AP was directly predicted by conscientiousness (+), neuroticism (+), extraversion (-) and perceived stress (-), while perceived stress was predicted by neuroticism (+) and by intrapersonal EC (-).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results illustrate the robust influence of conscientiousness on AP, while EC was not found to influence AP directly, but indirectly via its effect on PS.</p>","PeriodicalId":43067,"journal":{"name":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10535623/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Issues in Personality Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/cipp.2021.111423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Among the factors influencing academic performance (AP), individual differences at the trait level such as personality and emotional competences (EC) have been found to play a critical role, similarly to state variables such as perceived stress (PS).

Participants and procedure: The aim of this study was to clarify whether the influence of personality (Big Five) and EC on AP (general point average) is direct and/or mediated via PS. 537 undergraduate students from a French university (112 male and 425 female, Mage = 19.84 years, SDage = 1.74 years, range = 18-30 years; first year: n = 293, 55%; second year: n = 162, 30%, third year: n = 82, 15%) filled out the test battery around three weeks before the final examination.

Results: Path analysis showed that AP was directly predicted by conscientiousness (+), neuroticism (+), extraversion (-) and perceived stress (-), while perceived stress was predicted by neuroticism (+) and by intrapersonal EC (-).

Conclusions: The results illustrate the robust influence of conscientiousness on AP, while EC was not found to influence AP directly, but indirectly via its effect on PS.

人格和情绪能力对学业成绩的影响:感知压力介导的直接和间接途径
背景:在影响学业成绩(AP)的因素中,人格和情绪能力(EC)等特质层面的个体差异与感知压力(PS)等状态变量一样,起着至关重要的作用。参与者和程序:本研究的目的是澄清人格(大五项)和EC对AP(一般平均点)的影响是否直接和/或通过PS介导。来自法国一所大学的537名本科生(男112名,女425名,年龄= 19.84岁,年龄= 1.74岁,年龄范围= 18-30岁;第一年:n = 293,55%;第二年:n = 162,30%,第三年:n = 82,15%)在期末考试前三周左右填写测试电池。结果:通径分析显示,尽责性(+)、神经质性(+)、外向性(-)和感知压力(-)直接预测AP,感知压力由神经质性(+)和内省性EC(-)直接预测。结论:尽责性对AP有显著影响,而责任心对AP没有直接影响,而是通过对PS的影响间接影响AP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信