SURVEILLANCE FOR CHLAMYDIA SPP. WITH MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING ANALYSIS IN WILD AND CAPTIVE BIRDS IN VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA

J. Amery-Gale, A. Legione, M. Marenda, J. Owens, P. Eden, Barbara Konsak-Ilievski, P. Whiteley, E. Dobson, Elizabeth A Browne, R. Slocombe, J. Devlin
{"title":"SURVEILLANCE FOR CHLAMYDIA SPP. WITH MULTILOCUS SEQUENCE TYPING ANALYSIS IN WILD AND CAPTIVE BIRDS IN VICTORIA, AUSTRALIA","authors":"J. Amery-Gale, A. Legione, M. Marenda, J. Owens, P. Eden, Barbara Konsak-Ilievski, P. Whiteley, E. Dobson, Elizabeth A Browne, R. Slocombe, J. Devlin","doi":"10.7589/2018-11-281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Chlamydia psittaci typically infects birds and can cause outbreaks of avian chlamydiosis, but it also has the potential to cause zoonotic disease (psittacosis) in humans. To better understand the epidemiology of C. psittaci in Victoria, Australia, we conducted opportunistic sampling of more than 400 wild and captive birds presented to the Australian Wildlife Health Centre at Zoos Victoria's Healesville Sanctuary for veterinary care between December 2014 and December 2015. Samples were screened for the presence of chlamydial DNA using quantitative PCR, and positive samples were subjected to multilocus sequence typing analysis. The results showed a significantly higher prevalence of infection in captive birds (8%; 9/113) compared to wild birds (0.7%; 2/299). Multilocus sequence typing analysis revealed that C. psittaci sequence type 24 was detected in both wild and captive birds in the local region, while C. psittaci sequence type 27 was detected for the first time in an Australian avian host. The generally low prevalence of C. psittaci detection points to a generally low zoonotic risk to veterinary and support staff, although this risk may be higher when handling captive birds, where the prevalence of C. psittaci infection was almost 10-fold higher. Even with low rates of C. psittaci detection, appropriate hygiene and biosecurity practices are recommended due to the serious human health implications of infection with this pathogen.","PeriodicalId":22805,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Wildlife Diseases","volume":"71 1","pages":"16 - 26"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Wildlife Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7589/2018-11-281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

Abstract: Chlamydia psittaci typically infects birds and can cause outbreaks of avian chlamydiosis, but it also has the potential to cause zoonotic disease (psittacosis) in humans. To better understand the epidemiology of C. psittaci in Victoria, Australia, we conducted opportunistic sampling of more than 400 wild and captive birds presented to the Australian Wildlife Health Centre at Zoos Victoria's Healesville Sanctuary for veterinary care between December 2014 and December 2015. Samples were screened for the presence of chlamydial DNA using quantitative PCR, and positive samples were subjected to multilocus sequence typing analysis. The results showed a significantly higher prevalence of infection in captive birds (8%; 9/113) compared to wild birds (0.7%; 2/299). Multilocus sequence typing analysis revealed that C. psittaci sequence type 24 was detected in both wild and captive birds in the local region, while C. psittaci sequence type 27 was detected for the first time in an Australian avian host. The generally low prevalence of C. psittaci detection points to a generally low zoonotic risk to veterinary and support staff, although this risk may be higher when handling captive birds, where the prevalence of C. psittaci infection was almost 10-fold higher. Even with low rates of C. psittaci detection, appropriate hygiene and biosecurity practices are recommended due to the serious human health implications of infection with this pathogen.
澳大利亚维多利亚州野生和圈养鸟类衣原体多位点序列分型监测
摘要:鹦鹉热衣原体通常感染禽类,可引起禽类衣原体病暴发,但也有可能在人类中引起人畜共患病(鹦鹉热)。为了更好地了解鹦鹉螺在澳大利亚维多利亚州的流行病学,我们在2014年12月至2015年12月期间对400多只野生和圈养鸟类进行了机会抽样,这些鸟类被送到维多利亚动物园Healesville保护区的澳大利亚野生动物健康中心进行兽医护理。采用定量PCR技术对样品进行衣原体DNA筛选,阳性样品进行多位点序列分型分析。结果显示,圈养鸟类的感染率明显高于其他鸟类(8%;9/113),而野生鸟类(0.7%;2/299)。多位点序列分型分析显示,24型鹦鹉螺在当地野生和圈养鸟类中均检测到,27型鹦鹉螺在澳大利亚鸟类宿主中首次检测到。鹦鹉螺杆菌的检出率普遍较低,这表明兽医和支助人员的人畜共患风险普遍较低,尽管在处理圈养鸟类时这种风险可能更高,其中鹦鹉螺杆菌感染的流行率几乎高出10倍。即使鹦鹉螺杆菌的检出率很低,由于感染这种病原体对人类健康的严重影响,建议采取适当的卫生和生物安全措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信