The Lifeguard Rescue Reporting System: Survey Results from a Collaborative Data Collection Method

William Ramos, Roy R. Fielding, K. Anderson, Peter G. Wernicki
{"title":"The Lifeguard Rescue Reporting System: Survey Results from a Collaborative Data Collection Method","authors":"William Ramos, Roy R. Fielding, K. Anderson, Peter G. Wernicki","doi":"10.25035/ijare.13.02.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several water safety organizations have attempted to improve reporting regarding lifeguard actions in order to better understand the characteristics of successful, non-fatal rescues. In 2003, a collective effort initiated the Lifeguard Rescue Reporting System, an online survey distributed to lifeguards and facility managers across the United States and Canada to better understand rescue actions performed in pools/spas, water parks, and open water areas. After seven years of data collection, the online survey accumulated data reflecting 1,676 rescue actions, collecting information including location, victim characteristics and outcome, rescuer characteristics and strategies, and other general circumstances. Descriptive results indicated that at least half of victims were 14 years old or younger across all settings. Depths of 0.9-1.5m (3-5 ft) represented the range at which incidents most frequently occurred in pools and spas and waterparks, whereas the depth of incidents was generally deeper in natural and open waterways. During rescue incidents, water safety personnel generally identified victims either visually (83-92% of the time) and/or audibly (18-29%), although victim “profiling” was also employed 10-14% of the time to identify at-risk swimmers. Notably, across all three water setting types, no medical aid was required in most cases (60-72%), suggesting the efficacy and essentiality of lifeguards as aquatic first responders. Accordingly, as water-based recreation maintains its popularity, systematically collecting and analyzing data specific to everyday, rescue actions are critical to improving lifeguard education and strategic, data-based operating procedures.","PeriodicalId":38535,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25035/ijare.13.02.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several water safety organizations have attempted to improve reporting regarding lifeguard actions in order to better understand the characteristics of successful, non-fatal rescues. In 2003, a collective effort initiated the Lifeguard Rescue Reporting System, an online survey distributed to lifeguards and facility managers across the United States and Canada to better understand rescue actions performed in pools/spas, water parks, and open water areas. After seven years of data collection, the online survey accumulated data reflecting 1,676 rescue actions, collecting information including location, victim characteristics and outcome, rescuer characteristics and strategies, and other general circumstances. Descriptive results indicated that at least half of victims were 14 years old or younger across all settings. Depths of 0.9-1.5m (3-5 ft) represented the range at which incidents most frequently occurred in pools and spas and waterparks, whereas the depth of incidents was generally deeper in natural and open waterways. During rescue incidents, water safety personnel generally identified victims either visually (83-92% of the time) and/or audibly (18-29%), although victim “profiling” was also employed 10-14% of the time to identify at-risk swimmers. Notably, across all three water setting types, no medical aid was required in most cases (60-72%), suggesting the efficacy and essentiality of lifeguards as aquatic first responders. Accordingly, as water-based recreation maintains its popularity, systematically collecting and analyzing data specific to everyday, rescue actions are critical to improving lifeguard education and strategic, data-based operating procedures.
救生员救援报告系统:协同数据收集方法的调查结果
一些水上安全组织试图改进有关救生员行动的报告,以便更好地了解成功的非致命救援的特点。2003年,一项集体努力启动了救生员救援报告系统,这是一项在线调查,分发给美国和加拿大的救生员和设施管理人员,以更好地了解在游泳池/水疗中心、水上公园和开放水域进行的救援行动。经过7年的数据收集,在线调查积累了1676次救援行动的数据,收集了地点、受害者特征和结果、救援者特征和策略以及其他一般情况等信息。描述性结果表明,在所有情况下,至少有一半的受害者年龄在14岁或以下。0.9-1.5米(3-5英尺)的深度代表了游泳池、水疗中心和水上公园最常发生事故的范围,而在自然水域和开阔水域,事故的深度通常更深。在救援事件中,水上安全人员通常通过视觉(83% -92%的时间)和/或听觉(18% -29%)来识别受害者,尽管受害者“侧写”也被用于识别危险游泳者的时间为10-14%。值得注意的是,在所有三种水环境类型中,大多数情况下不需要医疗救助(60-72%),这表明救生员作为水上第一响应者的有效性和必要性。因此,随着水上娱乐活动的流行,系统地收集和分析日常具体数据,救援行动对于提高救生员教育和战略性的、基于数据的操作程序至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education
International Journal of Aquatic Research and Education Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Aquatic Science
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信