Pericardial late gadolinium enhancement and time to recurrence: a substudy from RHAPSODY, a phase 3 clinical trial of rilonacept in recurrent pericarditis.

European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice Pub Date : 2023-05-26 eCollection Date: 2023-05-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjimp/qyad003
Paul C Cremer, David Lin, Sushil A Luis, John Petersen, Antonio Abbate, Christine L Jellis, Debbie Kwon, Antonio Brucato, Fang Fang, Antonella Insalaco, Martin LeWinter, Basil S Lewis, Liangxing Zou, Stephen J Nicholls, Allan L Klein, Massimo Imazio, John F Paolini
{"title":"Pericardial late gadolinium enhancement and time to recurrence: a substudy from RHAPSODY, a phase 3 clinical trial of rilonacept in recurrent pericarditis.","authors":"Paul C Cremer, David Lin, Sushil A Luis, John Petersen, Antonio Abbate, Christine L Jellis, Debbie Kwon, Antonio Brucato, Fang Fang, Antonella Insalaco, Martin LeWinter, Basil S Lewis, Liangxing Zou, Stephen J Nicholls, Allan L Klein, Massimo Imazio, John F Paolini","doi":"10.1093/ehjimp/qyad003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>In this protocol-predefined substudy of the RHAPSODY trial, the primary aim was to assess whether pericardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was associated with time to pericarditis recurrence.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>RHAPSODY was a Phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized-withdrawal trial that demonstrated the efficacy of rilonacept in recurrent pericarditis (RP). Patients with a history of multiple RP and an active recurrence were enrolled and had the option to participate in a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging substudy. CMRs were interpreted by a blinded independent core laboratory with prespecified criteria to define pericardial LGE. Compared to patients with trace or mild pericardial LGE (<i>n</i> = 9), patients with moderate or severe pericardial LGE (<i>n</i> = 16) generally had a higher number of recurrent episodes per year (5.3 vs. 3.9) and a higher mean CRP level (3.6 vs. 1.1 mg/dL). Overall, 10/14 (71.4%) who received a placebo had a recurrence compared to 0/11 (0%) who received rilonacept. In patients randomized to placebo who had moderate or severe pericardial LGE, the median time to recurrence was 4.2 weeks compared to 10.7 weeks in patients who had trace or mild pericardial LGE. At the conclusion of the event-driven randomized-withdrawal period, among patients receiving a placebo, 5/7 (71.4%) with trace or mild pericardial LGE and 5/7 (71.4%) with moderate or severe pericardial LGE had a recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with multiple RP, these preliminary findings support the concept of pericardial LGE as an imaging biomarker that may inform the duration of treatment and risk of recurrence with cessation of therapy and larger studies should be considered.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrialsgov identifier: </strong>NCT03737110.</p>","PeriodicalId":94317,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11240150/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjimp/qyad003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: In this protocol-predefined substudy of the RHAPSODY trial, the primary aim was to assess whether pericardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was associated with time to pericarditis recurrence.

Methods and results: RHAPSODY was a Phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized-withdrawal trial that demonstrated the efficacy of rilonacept in recurrent pericarditis (RP). Patients with a history of multiple RP and an active recurrence were enrolled and had the option to participate in a cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging substudy. CMRs were interpreted by a blinded independent core laboratory with prespecified criteria to define pericardial LGE. Compared to patients with trace or mild pericardial LGE (n = 9), patients with moderate or severe pericardial LGE (n = 16) generally had a higher number of recurrent episodes per year (5.3 vs. 3.9) and a higher mean CRP level (3.6 vs. 1.1 mg/dL). Overall, 10/14 (71.4%) who received a placebo had a recurrence compared to 0/11 (0%) who received rilonacept. In patients randomized to placebo who had moderate or severe pericardial LGE, the median time to recurrence was 4.2 weeks compared to 10.7 weeks in patients who had trace or mild pericardial LGE. At the conclusion of the event-driven randomized-withdrawal period, among patients receiving a placebo, 5/7 (71.4%) with trace or mild pericardial LGE and 5/7 (71.4%) with moderate or severe pericardial LGE had a recurrence.

Conclusions: Among patients with multiple RP, these preliminary findings support the concept of pericardial LGE as an imaging biomarker that may inform the duration of treatment and risk of recurrence with cessation of therapy and larger studies should be considered.

Clinicaltrialsgov identifier: NCT03737110.

心包晚期钆增强与复发时间:RHAPSODY 的一项子研究,Rilonacept 治疗复发性心包炎的 3 期临床试验。
目的:在这项RHAPSODY试验的方案预设子研究中,主要目的是评估心包晚期钆增强(LGE)是否与心包炎复发时间相关:RHAPSODY是一项3期双盲、安慰剂对照、随机撤销试验,该试验证明了利龙赛普对复发性心包炎(RP)的疗效。有多次 RP 病史和活动性复发的患者被纳入试验,并可选择参加心脏磁共振 (CMR) 成像子研究。CMR由盲法独立核心实验室根据预先规定的心包LGE定义标准进行解读。与微量或轻度心包LGE患者(9人)相比,中度或重度心包LGE患者(16人)每年的复发次数更高(5.3次对3.9次),平均CRP水平更高(3.6毫克/分升对1.1毫克/分升)。总体而言,10/14(71.4%)名接受安慰剂治疗的患者复发,而0/11(0%)名接受利龙赛普治疗的患者复发。在随机接受安慰剂治疗的中度或重度心包LGE患者中,复发的中位时间为4.2周,而微量或轻度心包LGE患者的复发时间为10.7周。在事件驱动的随机退出期结束时,接受安慰剂治疗的患者中,5/7(71.4%)有微量或轻度心包LGE,5/7(71.4%)有中度或重度心包LGE的患者复发:在多发性 RP 患者中,这些初步研究结果支持将心包 LGE 作为成像生物标志物的概念,该标志物可为治疗持续时间和停止治疗后的复发风险提供信息,应考虑进行更大规模的研究:NCT03737110。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信