The Right to Privacy Regime in India: A Controlled and Authoritative Approach

IF 0.1 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
Sadiya S. Silvee
{"title":"The Right to Privacy Regime in India: A Controlled and Authoritative Approach","authors":"Sadiya S. Silvee","doi":"10.12982/cmujasr.2023.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unlike in some other countries, the right to privacy is not considered a fundamental right in India. The constitution of India does not recognize it in any form—not even home privacy which is recognized as the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure. In case [2011]8SCR725, the Supreme Court of India first recognized the “right to privacy as an integral part of right to life”. Since then, India has made four attempts to secure a right to privacy through legislation. Recently the revised Personal Data Protection Bill (2019) was introduced and is still under review. This article explores the perspective of India on the right to privacy from a historical and contemporary perspective, in two aspects: judicial and governmental. In doing so, more than 39 judicial judgments on the right to privacy and four major draft enactments are analyzed. The study affirms that Indian legislatures hold a political, controlled and authoritarian approach towards the right to privacy resulting in a conflict of interest with the people. Keywords: Right to privacy, Home privacy, E-privacy, Information privacy, Communication privacy, Protected zones, India.","PeriodicalId":40330,"journal":{"name":"ASR Chiang Mai University Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASR Chiang Mai University Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12982/cmujasr.2023.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlike in some other countries, the right to privacy is not considered a fundamental right in India. The constitution of India does not recognize it in any form—not even home privacy which is recognized as the right to be secure against unreasonable search and seizure. In case [2011]8SCR725, the Supreme Court of India first recognized the “right to privacy as an integral part of right to life”. Since then, India has made four attempts to secure a right to privacy through legislation. Recently the revised Personal Data Protection Bill (2019) was introduced and is still under review. This article explores the perspective of India on the right to privacy from a historical and contemporary perspective, in two aspects: judicial and governmental. In doing so, more than 39 judicial judgments on the right to privacy and four major draft enactments are analyzed. The study affirms that Indian legislatures hold a political, controlled and authoritarian approach towards the right to privacy resulting in a conflict of interest with the people. Keywords: Right to privacy, Home privacy, E-privacy, Information privacy, Communication privacy, Protected zones, India.
印度的隐私权制度:一种受控和权威的途径
与其他一些国家不同,隐私权在印度不被视为一项基本权利。印度宪法不承认任何形式的隐私——甚至不承认家庭隐私,而家庭隐私被认为是不受无理搜查和扣押的权利。在案例[2011]8SCR725中,印度最高法院首次承认“隐私权是生命权的组成部分”。从那时起,印度已经四次尝试通过立法来保障隐私权。最近,修订后的《个人数据保护法案(2019年)》出台,目前仍在审查中。本文从历史和当代的视角,从司法和政府两个方面探讨了印度的隐私权观。在此过程中,分析了39多项关于隐私权的司法判决和四项主要法规草案。该研究证实,印度立法机构对隐私权采取政治、控制和专制的态度,导致与人民的利益冲突。关键词:隐私权,家庭隐私,电子隐私,信息隐私,通信隐私,保护区,印度
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信