Intensity Difference Map (IDM) Accuracy Analysis for OPC Efficiency Verification and Further Enhancement

Q4 Engineering
Ahmed Awad, A. Takahashi, S. Tanaka, C. Kodama
{"title":"Intensity Difference Map (IDM) Accuracy Analysis for OPC Efficiency Verification and Further Enhancement","authors":"Ahmed Awad, A. Takahashi, S. Tanaka, C. Kodama","doi":"10.2197/ipsjtsldm.10.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optical Proximity Correction (OPC) is still nominated as a main stream in printing Sub-16 nm technology nodes in optical micro-lithography. However, long computation time is required to generate mask solutions with acceptable wafer image quality. Intensity Difference Map (IDM) has been recently proposed as a fast methodology to shorten OPC computation time with preserving acceptable wafer image quality. However, IDM has been evaluated only under a relatively relaxed Edge Placement Error (EPE) constraint of the final mask solution. Such an evaluation does not provide a satisfactory confirmation of the effectiveness of IDM if strict EPE constraints are imposed. In this paper, the accuracy of IDM is deeply analyzed to confirm its validity in terms of wafer image estimation accuracy along with its efficiency in shortening computation time. Thereafter, the stability of IDM accuracy against the increase in pattern area/density is confirmed. Finally, the regions suffering from lack of accuracy are analyzed for further enhancement. Experimental results show that congestion in the mask pattern forms a cardinal source of the lack of accuracy which is compensated through optimized selection of the kernels included in IDM.","PeriodicalId":38964,"journal":{"name":"IPSJ Transactions on System LSI Design Methodology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IPSJ Transactions on System LSI Design Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2197/ipsjtsldm.10.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Optical Proximity Correction (OPC) is still nominated as a main stream in printing Sub-16 nm technology nodes in optical micro-lithography. However, long computation time is required to generate mask solutions with acceptable wafer image quality. Intensity Difference Map (IDM) has been recently proposed as a fast methodology to shorten OPC computation time with preserving acceptable wafer image quality. However, IDM has been evaluated only under a relatively relaxed Edge Placement Error (EPE) constraint of the final mask solution. Such an evaluation does not provide a satisfactory confirmation of the effectiveness of IDM if strict EPE constraints are imposed. In this paper, the accuracy of IDM is deeply analyzed to confirm its validity in terms of wafer image estimation accuracy along with its efficiency in shortening computation time. Thereafter, the stability of IDM accuracy against the increase in pattern area/density is confirmed. Finally, the regions suffering from lack of accuracy are analyzed for further enhancement. Experimental results show that congestion in the mask pattern forms a cardinal source of the lack of accuracy which is compensated through optimized selection of the kernels included in IDM.
OPC效率验证的强度差图(IDM)精度分析及进一步改进
光学接近校正(OPC)仍然被认为是印刷光学微光刻中16纳米以下技术节点的主流。然而,要生成具有可接受晶圆图像质量的掩模解决方案,需要较长的计算时间。强度差图(IDM)最近被提出作为一种快速的方法来缩短OPC计算时间,同时保持可接受的晶圆图像质量。然而,IDM仅在最终掩模解的相对宽松的边缘放置误差(EPE)约束下进行评估。如果施加严格的EPE限制,这种评价不能令人满意地确认IDM的有效性。本文对IDM的精度进行了深入的分析,以验证其在晶圆图像估计精度方面的有效性以及在缩短计算时间方面的有效性。验证了IDM精度随图案面积/密度增加的稳定性。最后,对精度不足的区域进行了分析,以进一步提高精度。实验结果表明,掩模模式中的拥塞是导致精度不足的主要原因,通过对IDM中包含的核的优化选择可以得到补偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
IPSJ Transactions on System LSI Design Methodology
IPSJ Transactions on System LSI Design Methodology Engineering-Electrical and Electronic Engineering
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信