Does Thermoplastic Mask Alleivates Skin Sparing Effect of Photons in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Pilot study

P. Nagpal, D. Pruthi, P. Shanmugan, Paranthaman Chinnakari, Manish Pandey, Harpreet Singh
{"title":"Does Thermoplastic Mask Alleivates Skin Sparing Effect of Photons in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: A Pilot study","authors":"P. Nagpal, D. Pruthi, P. Shanmugan, Paranthaman Chinnakari, Manish Pandey, Harpreet Singh","doi":"10.19080/ctoij.2021.18.555978","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Head and Neck tumors are mainly treated with concurrent chemoradiation. Treatment delivery with Megavoltage beam has the advantage of skin sparing effect but still skin reactions have been a major side effect since 2D era. Initially these reactions were due to the delivery with bilateral opposed portals but with advent of IMRT/ VMAT, it has been possible to escalate the tumor dose with the need of strict immobilization with thermoplastic mask. This thermoplastic mask may have a bolus effect and can result in increase in surface dose resulting in skin reactions. The aim of this study was to evaluate if any bolus effect of thermoplastic mask exists. Materials and Methods: A total of 15 patients of histologically proven carcinoma oropharynx and hypopharynx were taken. Patients were scanned for planning CT with thermoplastic mask. Another scan was taken in the same position but without thermoplastic mask. Same contouring and planning were done on both the scans. Plans were made and ascertained that all OAR’s and target volumes should get similar doses. Skin contoured on both the scans was evaluated for the dose received. Results: Mean dose received by skin in patients with thermoplastic mask was 48.15 GY while Mean dose received by skin in patients without thermoplastic mask was 43.18 GY. A paired t-test was applied on the dataset which revealed a statistically significant difference between the skin doses with and without mask with a p value of < 0.05. Conclusion: Increase in skin dose can be attributed of the bolus effect of thermoplastic mask. This bolus effect should be considered once high dose to skin is observed during planning or patient develops skin reaction.","PeriodicalId":9575,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Therapy & Oncology International Journal","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Therapy & Oncology International Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/ctoij.2021.18.555978","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Head and Neck tumors are mainly treated with concurrent chemoradiation. Treatment delivery with Megavoltage beam has the advantage of skin sparing effect but still skin reactions have been a major side effect since 2D era. Initially these reactions were due to the delivery with bilateral opposed portals but with advent of IMRT/ VMAT, it has been possible to escalate the tumor dose with the need of strict immobilization with thermoplastic mask. This thermoplastic mask may have a bolus effect and can result in increase in surface dose resulting in skin reactions. The aim of this study was to evaluate if any bolus effect of thermoplastic mask exists. Materials and Methods: A total of 15 patients of histologically proven carcinoma oropharynx and hypopharynx were taken. Patients were scanned for planning CT with thermoplastic mask. Another scan was taken in the same position but without thermoplastic mask. Same contouring and planning were done on both the scans. Plans were made and ascertained that all OAR’s and target volumes should get similar doses. Skin contoured on both the scans was evaluated for the dose received. Results: Mean dose received by skin in patients with thermoplastic mask was 48.15 GY while Mean dose received by skin in patients without thermoplastic mask was 43.18 GY. A paired t-test was applied on the dataset which revealed a statistically significant difference between the skin doses with and without mask with a p value of < 0.05. Conclusion: Increase in skin dose can be attributed of the bolus effect of thermoplastic mask. This bolus effect should be considered once high dose to skin is observed during planning or patient develops skin reaction.
热塑性口罩是否能减轻头颈癌患者光子的皮肤保留效应:一项初步研究
头颈部肿瘤的治疗主要采用同步放化疗。使用高压光束进行治疗具有皮肤保护效果的优点,但自2D时代以来,皮肤反应一直是主要的副作用。最初,这些反应是由于双侧对侧门静脉输送所致,但随着IMRT/ VMAT技术的出现,由于需要用热塑性口罩严格固定,肿瘤剂量可能会增加。这种热塑性口罩可能具有丸效,并可能导致表面剂量增加,从而导致皮肤反应。本研究的目的是评估热塑性口罩是否存在任何剂量效应。材料与方法:选取经组织学证实的口咽癌和下咽癌患者15例。采用热塑性口罩对患者进行规划CT扫描。在相同位置进行另一次扫描,但没有热塑性口罩。在两次扫描中都做了相同的轮廓和规划。已制定计划并确定所有桨叶和目标体积应获得类似剂量。对两次扫描的皮肤轮廓进行剂量评估。结果:使用热塑性口罩患者皮肤接受的平均剂量为48.15 GY,未使用热塑性口罩患者皮肤接受的平均剂量为43.18 GY。对数据集进行配对t检验,结果显示,戴口罩和不戴口罩的皮肤剂量差异有统计学意义,p值< 0.05。结论:热塑性面膜的丸化作用可导致皮肤剂量增加。一旦在计划期间观察到高剂量的皮肤或患者出现皮肤反应,应考虑这种丸剂效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信