Predictors of adult spelling in an orthography of intermediate depth

Pub Date : 2022-06-07 DOI:10.1075/wll.00062.mes
Ana B. Mesquita, Inês Salomé Morais, L. Faísca, A. Reis, S. Castro
{"title":"Predictors of adult spelling in an orthography of intermediate depth","authors":"Ana B. Mesquita, Inês Salomé Morais, L. Faísca, A. Reis, S. Castro","doi":"10.1075/wll.00062.mes","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n What is the hallmark of a good speller? Spelling is a critical component in learning to become literate, but how\n it works in literate adults remains poorly explored. We examined word and pseudoword spelling in 214 adults in relation to general\n cognitive abilities, vocabulary, reading history, reading performance, phonological processing and rapid automatized naming. We\n conducted hierarchical multiple regression analyses to uncover predictors of spelling performance and compared a subsample of good\n and poor spellers to identify patterns of cognitive and language abilities associated with high vs. low spelling ability. In the\n regression model under test, which progressed from general cognitive and language abilities to specific reading-related skills,\n the most important predictor for word spelling was vocabulary, and for pseudoword spelling phonological processing (phoneme\n deletion). The model explained 20% of word spelling, and 8% of pseudoword spelling, variance. Good spellers outperformed poor\n spellers in reading connected text and pseudowords, and in phonological processing; poor spellers typically had a history of\n reading difficulties but similar levels of cognitive ability, word reading and RAN performance. Overall, our findings indicate\n that adult spelling relies more strongly on word knowledge than on reading proficiency and that, as in literacy acquisition, good\n phonology-related abilities are a hallmark of proficient adult spellers.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/wll.00062.mes","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

What is the hallmark of a good speller? Spelling is a critical component in learning to become literate, but how it works in literate adults remains poorly explored. We examined word and pseudoword spelling in 214 adults in relation to general cognitive abilities, vocabulary, reading history, reading performance, phonological processing and rapid automatized naming. We conducted hierarchical multiple regression analyses to uncover predictors of spelling performance and compared a subsample of good and poor spellers to identify patterns of cognitive and language abilities associated with high vs. low spelling ability. In the regression model under test, which progressed from general cognitive and language abilities to specific reading-related skills, the most important predictor for word spelling was vocabulary, and for pseudoword spelling phonological processing (phoneme deletion). The model explained 20% of word spelling, and 8% of pseudoword spelling, variance. Good spellers outperformed poor spellers in reading connected text and pseudowords, and in phonological processing; poor spellers typically had a history of reading difficulties but similar levels of cognitive ability, word reading and RAN performance. Overall, our findings indicate that adult spelling relies more strongly on word knowledge than on reading proficiency and that, as in literacy acquisition, good phonology-related abilities are a hallmark of proficient adult spellers.
分享
查看原文
中等深度正字法中成人拼写的预测因子
一个好的拼写者的标志是什么?拼写是学习识字的一个重要组成部分,但它如何在识字的成年人中发挥作用仍然知之甚少。研究了214名成人的单词和假词拼写与一般认知能力、词汇量、阅读历史、阅读表现、语音加工和快速自动命名的关系。我们进行了分层多元回归分析,以揭示拼写能力的预测因素,并比较了拼写能力好的和拼写能力差的子样本,以确定与拼写能力高和拼写能力低相关的认知和语言能力模式。在从一般认知和语言能力到特定阅读相关技能的回归模型中,单词拼写最重要的预测因子是词汇量,而伪单词拼写的语音处理(音位删除)最重要。该模型解释了20%的单词拼写和8%的伪单词拼写差异。在阅读连接文本和假词以及语音加工方面,拼写能力强的人比拼写能力差的人表现更好;拼写差的人通常有阅读困难的历史,但认知能力、单词阅读和RAN表现水平相似。总的来说,我们的研究结果表明,成人拼写更多地依赖于单词知识,而不是阅读能力,并且,在读写习得中,良好的语音相关能力是熟练成人拼写者的标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信