Incorporating a Race Salience Subscale Into the Cross Racial Identity Scale (CRIS)

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
F. Worrell, Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton, Beverly J. Vandiver, Peony E. Fhagen, W. Cross
{"title":"Incorporating a Race Salience Subscale Into the Cross Racial Identity Scale (CRIS)","authors":"F. Worrell, Rodolfo Mendoza-Denton, Beverly J. Vandiver, Peony E. Fhagen, W. Cross","doi":"10.1177/0095798420967598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we examined the internal consistency and structural validity of scores on an expanded version of the Cross Racial Identity Scale (CRIS) consisting of the original six subscales—Assimilation, Miseducation, Self-Hatred, Anti-White, Afrocentricity, and Multiculturalist Inclusive—and a seventh subscale called Race Salience. Participants consisted of two samples of African Americans. Sample 1 had 324 participants, most of whom were students at historically Black institutions, and Sample 2 had 340 students attending a predominantly White institution. CRIS subscale scores, including Race Salience were internally consistent in Sample 1, and an exploratory factor analysis supported the structural validity of the race salience score. A confirmatory factor analysis provided support for the seven-factor structure. Internal consistency and structural validity results were replicated in Sample 2. Future studies should examine other aspects of construct validity on this expanded version of the CRIS, such as convergent and discriminant validity, and the impact of seven subscales on the number and type of racial identity profiles that CRIS scores can yield.","PeriodicalId":47588,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Black Psychology","volume":"116 1","pages":"638 - 658"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Black Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0095798420967598","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In this study, we examined the internal consistency and structural validity of scores on an expanded version of the Cross Racial Identity Scale (CRIS) consisting of the original six subscales—Assimilation, Miseducation, Self-Hatred, Anti-White, Afrocentricity, and Multiculturalist Inclusive—and a seventh subscale called Race Salience. Participants consisted of two samples of African Americans. Sample 1 had 324 participants, most of whom were students at historically Black institutions, and Sample 2 had 340 students attending a predominantly White institution. CRIS subscale scores, including Race Salience were internally consistent in Sample 1, and an exploratory factor analysis supported the structural validity of the race salience score. A confirmatory factor analysis provided support for the seven-factor structure. Internal consistency and structural validity results were replicated in Sample 2. Future studies should examine other aspects of construct validity on this expanded version of the CRIS, such as convergent and discriminant validity, and the impact of seven subscales on the number and type of racial identity profiles that CRIS scores can yield.
跨种族认同量表(CRIS)中加入种族显著性分量表
在本研究中,我们检验了扩展版跨种族认同量表(CRIS)分数的内部一致性和结构有效性,该量表由最初的六个子量表(同化、错误教育、自我仇恨、反白人、非洲中心主义和多元文化包容)和第七个子量表(种族突出性)组成。参与者包括两个非裔美国人样本。样本1有324名参与者,其中大多数是历史上黑人院校的学生,样本2有340名学生就读于以白人为主的院校。CRIS子量表得分,包括种族显著性在样本1中是内部一致的,探索性因素分析支持种族显著性得分的结构效度。验证性因子分析为七因子结构提供了支持。内部一致性和结构效度结果在样本2中得到了重复。未来的研究应该在这个扩展版本的CRIS上检查结构效度的其他方面,如收敛效度和判别效度,以及七个子量表对CRIS分数可以产生的种族身份概况的数量和类型的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Black Psychology
Journal of Black Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.80%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: The Journal of Black Psychology publishes scholarly contributions within the field of psychology toward the understanding of the experience and behavior of Black populations. This includes reports of empirical research and discussions of the current literature and of original theoretical analyses of data from research studies or programs. Therefore, the Journal publishes work in any of the areas of cognition, personality, social behavior, physiological functioning, child development, education, and clinical application, in addition to empirical research and original theoretical formulations outside traditional boundaries, all integrated by a focus on the domain of Black populations and the objective of scholarly contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信