Laixing Liu, Yixin Deng, Fuquan Liu, Lei Chen, Dexi Li, Xiangyi Wang
{"title":"Correlation study of relative parameters of intracranial pressure and prognosis of patient with craniocerebral injury","authors":"Laixing Liu, Yixin Deng, Fuquan Liu, Lei Chen, Dexi Li, Xiangyi Wang","doi":"10.5430/dcc.v6n4p20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To analyze the correlation of the relative parameters of intracranial pressure to the prognosis in patients with craniocerebral injury.Methods: The clinical data of 80 patients with closed craniocerebral injury were retrospectively analyzed, and all of these patients underwent conventional examinations of arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure. Neumatic DCR system was used to monitor relative parameters of intracranial pressure from patients. According to the score of Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) upon discharge, they were divided into favorable prognosis group (GOS III-V, n = 46) and unfavorable prognosis group (GOS I-II, n = 34). The relative parameters of intracranial pressure of two groups were compared so as to analyze the correlation of the prognosis in patients to ICP-related parameters.Results: Pressure reactivity index (PRx) and intracranial pressure (ICP) of favorable prognosis group were significantly higher than those of unfavorable prognosis group (t = 12.27, t = 5.22, p < .05). Meanwhile, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and ICP-ABP wave amplitude correlation (IAAC) of favorable prognosis group were significantly lower than those of unfavorable prognosis group (t = 14.54, t = 14.78, p < .05). The average age, gender, duration of admission to neurosurgical intensive care unit (NICU) and GCS (Glasgow coma scale) score on admission of the two groups were not statistically significant.Conclusions: The prognosis and ICP-related parameters (such as PRx, ICP, CPP, etc.) in patients with craniocerebral injury are risk factors for the prognosis effect. Therefore, to monitor the above-mentioned indicators has an important clinical value for assessing the prognosis of craniocerebral injury.","PeriodicalId":63789,"journal":{"name":"临床病例讨论杂志(英文版)","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"临床病例讨论杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/dcc.v6n4p20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the correlation of the relative parameters of intracranial pressure to the prognosis in patients with craniocerebral injury.Methods: The clinical data of 80 patients with closed craniocerebral injury were retrospectively analyzed, and all of these patients underwent conventional examinations of arterial blood pressure and intracranial pressure. Neumatic DCR system was used to monitor relative parameters of intracranial pressure from patients. According to the score of Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) upon discharge, they were divided into favorable prognosis group (GOS III-V, n = 46) and unfavorable prognosis group (GOS I-II, n = 34). The relative parameters of intracranial pressure of two groups were compared so as to analyze the correlation of the prognosis in patients to ICP-related parameters.Results: Pressure reactivity index (PRx) and intracranial pressure (ICP) of favorable prognosis group were significantly higher than those of unfavorable prognosis group (t = 12.27, t = 5.22, p < .05). Meanwhile, cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and ICP-ABP wave amplitude correlation (IAAC) of favorable prognosis group were significantly lower than those of unfavorable prognosis group (t = 14.54, t = 14.78, p < .05). The average age, gender, duration of admission to neurosurgical intensive care unit (NICU) and GCS (Glasgow coma scale) score on admission of the two groups were not statistically significant.Conclusions: The prognosis and ICP-related parameters (such as PRx, ICP, CPP, etc.) in patients with craniocerebral injury are risk factors for the prognosis effect. Therefore, to monitor the above-mentioned indicators has an important clinical value for assessing the prognosis of craniocerebral injury.
目的:分析颅脑损伤患者颅内压相关参数与预后的相关性。方法:回顾性分析80例闭合性颅脑损伤患者的临床资料,所有患者均行常规动脉血压和颅内压检查。采用气动DCR系统监测患者颅内压相关参数。根据出院时格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)评分分为预后良好组(GOS III-V, n = 46)和预后不良组(GOS I-II, n = 34)。比较两组患者颅内压相关参数,分析患者预后与icp相关参数的相关性。结果:预后良好组压力反应指数(PRx)和颅内压(ICP)显著高于预后不良组(t = 12.27, t = 5.22, p < 0.05)。同时,预后良好组脑灌注压(CPP)和ICP-ABP波幅相关性(IAAC)均显著低于预后不良组(t = 14.54, t = 14.78, p < 0.05)。两组患者的平均年龄、性别、入住神经外科重症监护病房(NICU)时间及入院时GCS评分差异均无统计学意义。结论:颅脑损伤患者预后及ICP相关参数(如PRx、ICP、CPP等)是影响预后效果的危险因素。因此,监测上述指标对评估颅脑损伤预后具有重要的临床价值。