Patient pathways to bariatric surgery: What preoperative medical weight management programs exist globally – Results of an international survey

Danielle Clyde, M. Boland, Leo Brown, G. McCabe, W. Cambridge, Kerry Aitken, Gillian Drummond, B. Joyce, Andrew Beaux, B. Tulloh, O. Moussa, Wah Yang, B. Madhok, Peter Lamb, K. Mahawar, Andrew N. Robertson
{"title":"Patient pathways to bariatric surgery: What preoperative medical weight management programs exist globally – Results of an international survey","authors":"Danielle Clyde, M. Boland, Leo Brown, G. McCabe, W. Cambridge, Kerry Aitken, Gillian Drummond, B. Joyce, Andrew Beaux, B. Tulloh, O. Moussa, Wah Yang, B. Madhok, Peter Lamb, K. Mahawar, Andrew N. Robertson","doi":"10.4103/jbs.jbs_3_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Bariatric surgery is an accepted treatment worldwide for patients with obesity due to its proven metabolic effects. However, there are variations worldwide in clinical criteria that must be met to qualify for surgery. This study aims to explore globally established practice and opinions on preoperative workup for bariatric surgery. Materials and Methods: A review of literature and international guidelines was performed by a multidisciplinary team and used to develop an online questionnaire survey. This was distributed to bariatric professionals electronically. Results: Two hundred and forty-four bariatric health-care professionals from 224 medical centers across 57 countries completed the survey. The majority of respondents were surgeons (67.2%), and the remainder were other multidisciplinary professionals. Over half of medical centers were public hospitals (50.8%), with most performing over 200 procedures per year (30.3%). Only 68.4% (n = 167) of respondent hospitals used recognized referral guidelines; however, 81.9% felt that there should be written referral criteria (P < 0.001). In 71.3% (n = 172) of respondent units' patients underwent a Medical Weight Management Programme (MWMP) as part of their preparation for surgery. Significant differences were identified worldwide in the criteria used to determine progression to surgery (P < 0.001), time spent in MWMP prior to surgery (P < 0.001), and the roles of members forming the bariatric multidisciplinary team (P = 0.006). Conclusion: This study has identified significant variation in global bariatric surgery practices and highlights the responsibility that societies such as the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disease (IFSO) and the Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Society have in promoting universal clinical guidelines.","PeriodicalId":73828,"journal":{"name":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jbs.jbs_3_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Bariatric surgery is an accepted treatment worldwide for patients with obesity due to its proven metabolic effects. However, there are variations worldwide in clinical criteria that must be met to qualify for surgery. This study aims to explore globally established practice and opinions on preoperative workup for bariatric surgery. Materials and Methods: A review of literature and international guidelines was performed by a multidisciplinary team and used to develop an online questionnaire survey. This was distributed to bariatric professionals electronically. Results: Two hundred and forty-four bariatric health-care professionals from 224 medical centers across 57 countries completed the survey. The majority of respondents were surgeons (67.2%), and the remainder were other multidisciplinary professionals. Over half of medical centers were public hospitals (50.8%), with most performing over 200 procedures per year (30.3%). Only 68.4% (n = 167) of respondent hospitals used recognized referral guidelines; however, 81.9% felt that there should be written referral criteria (P < 0.001). In 71.3% (n = 172) of respondent units' patients underwent a Medical Weight Management Programme (MWMP) as part of their preparation for surgery. Significant differences were identified worldwide in the criteria used to determine progression to surgery (P < 0.001), time spent in MWMP prior to surgery (P < 0.001), and the roles of members forming the bariatric multidisciplinary team (P = 0.006). Conclusion: This study has identified significant variation in global bariatric surgery practices and highlights the responsibility that societies such as the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disease (IFSO) and the Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Society have in promoting universal clinical guidelines.
患者到减肥手术的途径:全球存在哪些术前医疗体重管理程序-一项国际调查的结果
简介:减肥手术是世界范围内公认的治疗肥胖患者的方法,因为它证明了代谢作用。然而,在世界范围内,有不同的临床标准,必须符合手术资格。本研究旨在探讨减肥手术术前检查的国际惯例和意见。材料和方法:一个多学科团队对文献和国际指南进行了回顾,并用于开发在线问卷调查。这是通过电子方式分发给减肥专业人士的。结果:来自57个国家224个医疗中心的244名肥胖保健专业人员完成了调查。大多数受访者为外科医生(67.2%),其余为其他多学科专业。超过一半的医疗中心是公立医院(50.8%),大多数每年进行200次以上的手术(30.3%)。只有68.4% (n = 167)的受访医院使用公认的转诊指南;然而,81.9%的人认为应该有书面的转诊标准(P < 0.001)。71.3% (n = 172)的应答单位患者接受了医疗体重管理计划(MWMP),作为手术准备的一部分。在确定手术进展的标准(P < 0.001)、手术前在MWMP中花费的时间(P < 0.001)以及组成减肥多学科团队的成员的角色(P = 0.006)方面,世界范围内发现了显著差异。结论:本研究确定了全球减肥手术实践的显著差异,并强调了国际肥胖和代谢疾病外科联合会(IFSO)和上胃肠外科学会等协会在促进通用临床指南方面的责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信