Simulating the Cognitive Leap Using Brainwriting

J. Langham, Neil Paulsen
{"title":"Simulating the Cognitive Leap Using Brainwriting","authors":"J. Langham, Neil Paulsen","doi":"10.1111/DMJ.12062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Idea generation and ‘brainstorming’ is most effective when conducted in groups and in person. However, in-person co-creation activities have many limitations. The digital environment provides opportunities to ideate remotely and to enhance creativity. We designed an online experiment to assess the impact of brainwriting on the effectiveness of ideation. Our intention was to determine if remote digital brainstorming could improve ideation, harnessing diversity in experience and knowledge whilst problem solving. Results revealed that unusual and novel ideas occurred in approximately 53% of cases using our simulated environment. Compared to the pre-session control activity, ideas generated were more sophisticated and included improvement in all cases. Our experiment demonstrates that digital brainwriting can significantly improve the quality and quantity of new ideas.","PeriodicalId":100367,"journal":{"name":"Design Management Journal","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/DMJ.12062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Idea generation and ‘brainstorming’ is most effective when conducted in groups and in person. However, in-person co-creation activities have many limitations. The digital environment provides opportunities to ideate remotely and to enhance creativity. We designed an online experiment to assess the impact of brainwriting on the effectiveness of ideation. Our intention was to determine if remote digital brainstorming could improve ideation, harnessing diversity in experience and knowledge whilst problem solving. Results revealed that unusual and novel ideas occurred in approximately 53% of cases using our simulated environment. Compared to the pre-session control activity, ideas generated were more sophisticated and included improvement in all cases. Our experiment demonstrates that digital brainwriting can significantly improve the quality and quantity of new ideas.
用大脑写作模拟认知飞跃
想法的产生和“头脑风暴”在团队和面对面进行时是最有效的。然而,面对面的共同创造活动有许多局限性。数字环境提供了远程构思和增强创造力的机会。我们设计了一个在线实验来评估大脑写作对创意有效性的影响。我们的目的是确定远程数字头脑风暴是否可以改善创意,在解决问题的同时利用经验和知识的多样性。结果显示,在我们的模拟环境中,大约53%的情况下出现了不寻常和新颖的想法。与会前的控制活动相比,产生的想法更复杂,在所有情况下都有改进。我们的实验表明,数字大脑写作可以显著提高新想法的质量和数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信