Konstantin Stanislavski and Michael Chekhov: tracing the two practitioners’ “lures” for emotional activation

IF 0.2 0 THEATER
Aphrodite Evangelatou
{"title":"Konstantin Stanislavski and Michael Chekhov: tracing the two practitioners’ “lures” for emotional activation","authors":"Aphrodite Evangelatou","doi":"10.1080/20567790.2020.1772550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Konstantin Stanislavski points out that emotions are like wild animals that can only be lured rather than approached directly; he urges his students not to try to force emotions to arrive, as feelings are independent of the will and cannot be manipulated. Like a whisperer, the actor should lure emotions, gently invite them in, approach them indirectly, instead of “going after” them and scaring them away. During his extensive and revolutionary research on the actor’s craft, the Russian pioneer discovered various such indirect “lures” for emotional activation. This article reviews the tangible points of entry to the unruly feelings as identified by Stanislavski, as well as those explored by his pupil, Michael Chekhov. The two practitioners’ approach to emotion is examined here, with emphasis on two key publications respectively: Stanislavski’s An Actor’s Work and Chekhov’s To the Actor. The article discusses the lures of concentration, imagination, “well-founded, apt and productive” actions, emotion memory, tempo-rhythm, empathy (fellow-feeling), external stimuli such as lighting and props, and the actor’s focus on that which is specific, tangible, and detailed. The review of Stanislavski’s lures is followed by a discussion of Michael Chekhov’s insights on artistically-induced emotion and the pathways he identified for stirring the performer’s inner life, emphasizing the exploration of qualities of movement, objective atmospheres, and the actor’s embodied imagination.","PeriodicalId":40821,"journal":{"name":"Stanislavski Studies","volume":"73 1","pages":"21 - 39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stanislavski Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20567790.2020.1772550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT Konstantin Stanislavski points out that emotions are like wild animals that can only be lured rather than approached directly; he urges his students not to try to force emotions to arrive, as feelings are independent of the will and cannot be manipulated. Like a whisperer, the actor should lure emotions, gently invite them in, approach them indirectly, instead of “going after” them and scaring them away. During his extensive and revolutionary research on the actor’s craft, the Russian pioneer discovered various such indirect “lures” for emotional activation. This article reviews the tangible points of entry to the unruly feelings as identified by Stanislavski, as well as those explored by his pupil, Michael Chekhov. The two practitioners’ approach to emotion is examined here, with emphasis on two key publications respectively: Stanislavski’s An Actor’s Work and Chekhov’s To the Actor. The article discusses the lures of concentration, imagination, “well-founded, apt and productive” actions, emotion memory, tempo-rhythm, empathy (fellow-feeling), external stimuli such as lighting and props, and the actor’s focus on that which is specific, tangible, and detailed. The review of Stanislavski’s lures is followed by a discussion of Michael Chekhov’s insights on artistically-induced emotion and the pathways he identified for stirring the performer’s inner life, emphasizing the exploration of qualities of movement, objective atmospheres, and the actor’s embodied imagination.
康斯坦丁·斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基和迈克尔·契诃夫:追踪两位实践者对情绪激活的“诱惑”
康斯坦丁·斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基指出,情感就像野生动物,只能被引诱而不能直接接近;他敦促他的学生不要试图强迫情绪到来,因为感觉是独立于意志的,不能被操纵。就像低语者一样,演员应该吸引情感,温柔地邀请它们进来,间接地接近它们,而不是“追逐”它们,把它们吓跑。在他对演员技艺的广泛而革命性的研究中,这位俄罗斯先驱发现了各种间接的情感激活“诱饵”。本文回顾了斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基以及他的学生契诃夫所探索的那些难以驾驭的情感的具体切入点。本文考察了这两位实践者对情感的态度,重点分别放在两本重要出版物上:斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基的《演员的作品》和契诃夫的《致演员》。这篇文章讨论了集中注意力、想象力、“有根据的、恰当的和富有成效的”动作、情感记忆、节奏节奏、同理心(同伴的感觉)、外部刺激(如灯光和道具)以及演员对具体、有形和细节的关注。在回顾斯坦尼斯拉夫斯基的《诱惑》之后,我们将讨论迈克尔·契诃夫(Michael Chekhov)对艺术诱发情感的见解,以及他确定的激发表演者内心生活的途径,强调对动作品质、客观氛围和演员体现想象力的探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信