Strengths and Success: Technology and Engineering Student Perceptions

IF 0.5 Q3 SOCIAL ISSUES
Saxon J. Ryan, G. Mosher
{"title":"Strengths and Success: Technology and Engineering Student Perceptions","authors":"Saxon J. Ryan, G. Mosher","doi":"10.21061/jts.402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Strengths have been hypothesized to play a role in how a person approaches leadership and problem-solving. The Clifton StrengthsFinder (CSF) is a common way to identify and measure an individual’s strengths. This research examined the role of CSF strengths in the academic success of engineering and technology students within a large, midwestern, research-intensive, land-grant university. The purpose of this research was to identify how students use their CSF strengths and to identify if students perceive a connection between strengths and their success. This research utilized semi-structured interviews with students to gather detailed qualitative information on student perceptions of success and CSF strengths. The survey collected information on student perceptions of how useful strengths are in various scenarios and if there is a connection between student success and CSF strengths. Students perceived that there were a set of strengths that make some students more successful than others, but they were not able to identify what those strengths were. Primarily, students perceived CSF strengths were useful in group academic tasks but were not useful in individual academic tasks. Based on the responses from these interviews, students are not aware of all the scenarios in which they can use their strengths. ","PeriodicalId":43439,"journal":{"name":"Tecnoscienza-Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tecnoscienza-Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21061/jts.402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Strengths have been hypothesized to play a role in how a person approaches leadership and problem-solving. The Clifton StrengthsFinder (CSF) is a common way to identify and measure an individual’s strengths. This research examined the role of CSF strengths in the academic success of engineering and technology students within a large, midwestern, research-intensive, land-grant university. The purpose of this research was to identify how students use their CSF strengths and to identify if students perceive a connection between strengths and their success. This research utilized semi-structured interviews with students to gather detailed qualitative information on student perceptions of success and CSF strengths. The survey collected information on student perceptions of how useful strengths are in various scenarios and if there is a connection between student success and CSF strengths. Students perceived that there were a set of strengths that make some students more successful than others, but they were not able to identify what those strengths were. Primarily, students perceived CSF strengths were useful in group academic tasks but were not useful in individual academic tasks. Based on the responses from these interviews, students are not aware of all the scenarios in which they can use their strengths. 
优势和成功:技术和工程学生的看法
人们假设优势在一个人如何处理领导和解决问题方面发挥作用。Clifton StrengthsFinder (CSF)是一种识别和测量个人优势的常用方法。本研究考察了CSF优势在中西部一所大型研究密集型赠地大学工程技术专业学生学业成功中的作用。本研究的目的是确定学生如何使用他们的CSF优势,并确定学生是否认为优势与他们的成功之间存在联系。本研究利用对学生的半结构化访谈来收集关于学生对成功和CSF优势的看法的详细定性信息。该调查收集了学生对优势在各种情况下的有用程度的看法,以及学生成功与CSF优势之间是否存在联系的信息。学生们认为,有一系列的优势使一些学生比其他人更成功,但他们无法确定这些优势是什么。首先,学生认为CSF优势在小组学术任务中有用,但在个人学术任务中无用。从这些访谈的回答来看,学生们并没有意识到他们可以在哪些情况下发挥自己的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信