{"title":"An ameliorated methodology for the design of panoptic work process flow diagram","authors":"S. M. Handigund, S. Nagalakshmi","doi":"10.1109/RTEICT.2016.7808200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"UML is the only language which clearly distinguishes a higher level design and lower level design diagrams. While designing UML diagrams, the same semantics can be implemented with different pragmatics. This created the commotion in the SDLC design stages. This commotion leads to the gorge between the higher level and lower level designs. This is resolved by the redesign of new higher level diagrams those constellate the lower level diagrams to maintain the balustrade ordered pan-tile sequel of SDLC stages. The precise study of DFD reveals that though DFD represents the behavioral aspect extrinsically, it intrinsically represent the structural flow. On the other hand CD represents the structural information extrinsically, intrinsically it represents behavioral aspect. Thus individually, both diagrams are panoptic complements to each other. So each perse cannot completely give either structural or behavioral aspect of the project. However, if both are superposed each other, it gives both together completely the behavioral and structural aspect of the project. Hence, in our paper DFD and CD are used to design the higher level diagram semiotics to resurrect the SDLC stages.","PeriodicalId":6527,"journal":{"name":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information & Communication Technology (RTEICT)","volume":"100 1","pages":"2052-2055"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 IEEE International Conference on Recent Trends in Electronics, Information & Communication Technology (RTEICT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RTEICT.2016.7808200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
UML is the only language which clearly distinguishes a higher level design and lower level design diagrams. While designing UML diagrams, the same semantics can be implemented with different pragmatics. This created the commotion in the SDLC design stages. This commotion leads to the gorge between the higher level and lower level designs. This is resolved by the redesign of new higher level diagrams those constellate the lower level diagrams to maintain the balustrade ordered pan-tile sequel of SDLC stages. The precise study of DFD reveals that though DFD represents the behavioral aspect extrinsically, it intrinsically represent the structural flow. On the other hand CD represents the structural information extrinsically, intrinsically it represents behavioral aspect. Thus individually, both diagrams are panoptic complements to each other. So each perse cannot completely give either structural or behavioral aspect of the project. However, if both are superposed each other, it gives both together completely the behavioral and structural aspect of the project. Hence, in our paper DFD and CD are used to design the higher level diagram semiotics to resurrect the SDLC stages.