Responsible Forest-centred Climate Policy

IF 0.1 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
S. Maher, Adam Forbes
{"title":"Responsible Forest-centred Climate Policy","authors":"S. Maher, Adam Forbes","doi":"10.26686/pq.v18i2.7574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2021 Glasgow Climate Pact and latest IPCC reports unequivocally recognise that urgent, concerted action is needed to address theinterconnected crises of climate change and biodiversity. These twin emergencies are now viewed as one and forests are at the centre of this emergent but dominant discourse. Aotearoa New Zealand faces the challenge of addressing this call to action and is well resourced to responsibly answer. There are multiple forestry models available to the government to select from, but often the difficulty lies in discerning the differences between models. Here we tackle this issue by assessing the spectrum of forestry models and evaluating the biodiversity and carbon sequestration outcomes of each. We then suggest that models which incorporate native species are best placed to solve the twin crises and, as such, government should prioritise native forests in its climate policy framework.","PeriodicalId":43642,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Policy Quarterly","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Policy Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26686/pq.v18i2.7574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The 2021 Glasgow Climate Pact and latest IPCC reports unequivocally recognise that urgent, concerted action is needed to address theinterconnected crises of climate change and biodiversity. These twin emergencies are now viewed as one and forests are at the centre of this emergent but dominant discourse. Aotearoa New Zealand faces the challenge of addressing this call to action and is well resourced to responsibly answer. There are multiple forestry models available to the government to select from, but often the difficulty lies in discerning the differences between models. Here we tackle this issue by assessing the spectrum of forestry models and evaluating the biodiversity and carbon sequestration outcomes of each. We then suggest that models which incorporate native species are best placed to solve the twin crises and, as such, government should prioritise native forests in its climate policy framework.
以森林为中心的负责任气候政策
2021年《格拉斯哥气候公约》和IPCC最新报告明确认识到,需要采取紧急、协调一致的行动,应对气候变化和生物多样性这两个相互关联的危机。这两种紧急情况现在被视为一体,森林是这种紧急但占主导地位的话语的中心。新西兰面临着应对这一行动呼吁的挑战,并有充足的资源负责地作出回应。政府有多种林业模式可供选择,但困难往往在于区分不同模式之间的差异。在这里,我们通过评估森林模式的频谱,并评估每种模式的生物多样性和碳固存结果来解决这个问题。然后,我们建议将本地物种纳入模型最适合解决双重危机,因此,政府应该在其气候政策框架中优先考虑原生森林。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Policy Quarterly
Turkish Policy Quarterly POLITICAL SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信