Distribution and Antifungal Susceptibility ofCandida Species Isolated from Clinical Specimens at the University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia

K. Sarenje, C. Lukwesa-Musyani, J. Mwansa, M. Samutela, Annie Kalonda, T. Kaile, J. Mwaba, G. Kwenda
{"title":"Distribution and Antifungal Susceptibility ofCandida Species Isolated from Clinical Specimens at the University Teaching Hospital, Lusaka, Zambia","authors":"K. Sarenje, C. Lukwesa-Musyani, J. Mwansa, M. Samutela, Annie Kalonda, T. Kaile, J. Mwaba, G. Kwenda","doi":"10.9790/3013-0702010109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"-Background:Candida species have emerged as successful pathogens worldwide and are associated with immunocompromised patients. Additionally, there is increasing resistance of Candida species to antifungal agents, and this has greatly contributed to the high morbidity and mortality amongst affected patients. In Zambia, little is known about the distribution of Candida species and their antifungal susceptibility patterns. Speciation of Candida species is important as knowledge of the infecting species is important for guiding therapy. The objective of this study was, therefore, to characterise Candida species isolated from different clinical specimens at the University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka. Methods:This was a cross-sectional study involving the identification of 96 Candidaspecies from various clinical specimens, and determination of their antifungal susceptibility patterns. Identification of the isolates was achieved by the use of the API 20C AUX kit, followed by DNA sequencing of the Internal Transcribed Spacer region of the ribosomal DNA, whilst the agar-based E-test, using fluconazole, amphotericin B, flucytosine, and caspofungin, was used for antifungal susceptibility testing. Results: Data obtained showed that Candida albicans were the predominant species (66.7%), followed by C. lusitaniae (12.2%), C. glabrata (6.7%), C. tropicalis (5.6%), C. parapsilosis (3.3%), C. quilliermondii (3.3%), C.pelliculosa (1.1%) and C. keyr (1.1%). Most of the Candida species exhibited high levels of resistance to fluconazole and amphotericin B, but were sensitive to caspofungin and flucytosine. C. albicans was resistant to fluconazole (18.3%,) with an MIC90 of 256μg/ml and amphotericin B (10%) with MIC90 of 1.5μg/ml. C. glabrata was the most resistant species against amphotericin B (66.6%) with an MIC90 of 2μg/ml.C. albicans and most of the non-albicans species exhibited multi-drug resistance. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that identification of Candida species to species level and susceptibility testing are important for accurate treatment of Candida infections.","PeriodicalId":14540,"journal":{"name":"IOSR Journal of Pharmacy","volume":"85 1","pages":"01-09"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOSR Journal of Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9790/3013-0702010109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

-Background:Candida species have emerged as successful pathogens worldwide and are associated with immunocompromised patients. Additionally, there is increasing resistance of Candida species to antifungal agents, and this has greatly contributed to the high morbidity and mortality amongst affected patients. In Zambia, little is known about the distribution of Candida species and their antifungal susceptibility patterns. Speciation of Candida species is important as knowledge of the infecting species is important for guiding therapy. The objective of this study was, therefore, to characterise Candida species isolated from different clinical specimens at the University Teaching Hospital in Lusaka. Methods:This was a cross-sectional study involving the identification of 96 Candidaspecies from various clinical specimens, and determination of their antifungal susceptibility patterns. Identification of the isolates was achieved by the use of the API 20C AUX kit, followed by DNA sequencing of the Internal Transcribed Spacer region of the ribosomal DNA, whilst the agar-based E-test, using fluconazole, amphotericin B, flucytosine, and caspofungin, was used for antifungal susceptibility testing. Results: Data obtained showed that Candida albicans were the predominant species (66.7%), followed by C. lusitaniae (12.2%), C. glabrata (6.7%), C. tropicalis (5.6%), C. parapsilosis (3.3%), C. quilliermondii (3.3%), C.pelliculosa (1.1%) and C. keyr (1.1%). Most of the Candida species exhibited high levels of resistance to fluconazole and amphotericin B, but were sensitive to caspofungin and flucytosine. C. albicans was resistant to fluconazole (18.3%,) with an MIC90 of 256μg/ml and amphotericin B (10%) with MIC90 of 1.5μg/ml. C. glabrata was the most resistant species against amphotericin B (66.6%) with an MIC90 of 2μg/ml.C. albicans and most of the non-albicans species exhibited multi-drug resistance. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that identification of Candida species to species level and susceptibility testing are important for accurate treatment of Candida infections.
赞比亚卢萨卡大学教学医院临床标本中假丝酵母菌的分布及抗真菌敏感性
背景:念珠菌已经成为世界范围内成功的病原体,并且与免疫功能低下的患者有关。此外,念珠菌对抗真菌药物的耐药性越来越强,这在很大程度上导致了受影响患者的高发病率和死亡率。在赞比亚,人们对念珠菌种类的分布及其抗真菌敏感性模式知之甚少。念珠菌种类的形成很重要,因为了解感染种类对指导治疗很重要。因此,本研究的目的是表征从卢萨卡大学教学医院不同临床标本中分离出的念珠菌种类。方法:这是一项横断面研究,包括从各种临床标本中鉴定96种念珠菌,并确定其抗真菌敏感性模式。使用API 20C AUX试剂盒对分离株进行鉴定,随后对核糖体DNA的Internal转录间隔区进行DNA测序,同时使用琼脂为基础的E-test,使用氟康唑、两性霉素B、氟胞嘧啶和caspofungin进行抗真菌药敏试验。结果:白色念珠菌为优势菌种(66.7%),其次为卢西塔念珠菌(12.2%)、光秃念珠菌(6.7%)、热带念珠菌(5.6%)、副枯枝念珠菌(3.3%)、鹅毛念珠菌(3.3%)、皮带念珠菌(1.1%)和keyr念珠菌(1.1%)。大多数念珠菌对氟康唑和两性霉素B表现出较高的耐药性,但对卡泊真菌素和氟胞嘧啶敏感。白色念珠菌对氟康唑耐药(18.3%),MIC90为256μg/ml;对两性霉素B耐药(10%),MIC90为1.5μg/ml。对两性霉素B抗性最强的品种为光田菊(66.6%),MIC90为2μg/ml.C。白色念珠菌和大部分非白色念珠菌均表现多重耐药。结论:本研究提示念珠菌菌种鉴定及药敏试验对念珠菌感染的准确治疗具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信