Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient(ADC) of Diffusion eighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Common Renal Disease Diagnosis

Yuelang Zhang, Xingwang Sun, Guangnan Quan, Yongqian Qiang, Chenxia Li
{"title":"Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient(ADC) of Diffusion eighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Common Renal Disease Diagnosis","authors":"Yuelang Zhang,&nbsp;Xingwang Sun,&nbsp;Guangnan Quan,&nbsp;Yongqian Qiang,&nbsp;Chenxia Li","doi":"10.1016/S1007-4376(09)60007-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To find the value of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of common renal diseases.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>There were 30 healthy subjects and 81 patients with renal lesions (56 cases of renal carcinoma, 18 lesions of 12 cases of renal angiomyolipoma, and 21 lesions of 13 cases of renal cysts). Conventional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging were carried out. We measured the average ADC value of the renal lesions and normal kidneys. ADC maps from different b values were generated by a statistical package.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The ADC values of normal kidneys with three different motion-probing gradients(b=500, 800, 1000 sec/mm<sup>2</sup>) were 2.78 ± 0.14, × 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, 2.45 ± 0.13, × 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, 2.13 ± 0.14, × 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The ADC values of renal cell carcinoma with three different motion-probing gradients(b=500, 800, 1000 sec/mm<sup>2</sup>) were 1.63 ± 0.14 × 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, 1.31± 0.18 × 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, 1.07 ± 0.15, 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Among the renal cell carcinoma, the ADC value of clear cell type were 1.67 ± 0.09, × 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, 1.36 ± 0.13, × 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, 1.15 ± 0.14, × 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, respectively; the ADC values of granular cell type were 1.59 ± 0.19, × 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, 1.25 ± 0.22, × 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, 0.97 ± 0.12, × 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The ADC values of renal angiomyolipoma with three different motion-probing gradients(b=500, 800, 1000 sec/mm<sup>2</sup>) were 0.88± 0.08, 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, 0.63 ± 0.07, × 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, 0.43 ± 0.04, × 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. The ADC values of renal cystic lesions with three different motion-probing gradients(b=500, 800, 1000 sec/mm<sup>2</sup>) were 3.73 ± 0.18, × 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, 3.44 ± 0.13, × 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, 3.09 ± 0.21, × 10<sup>−3</sup>mm<sup>2</sup>s<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. Statistically significant differences exists between the ADC values of normal kidney, renal carcinomas, renal angiomyolipomas and renal cysts when the b value is the same. Among the different cell types of renal carcinomas, the ADC value of granular cell carcinoma is lower than that of clear cell carcinomas.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>It is of benefit in diagnosing and distinguishing between benign and malignant renal tumors to know the ADC values in diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Furthermore, these values help to know the internal structure of the tumor and the tumor typel, which is helpful to the treatment and in predicting the patient's prognosis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100807,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nanjing Medical University","volume":"22 6","pages":"Pages 362-365"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1007-4376(09)60007-1","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nanjing Medical University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1007437609600071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Objective

To find the value of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of common renal diseases.

Methods

There were 30 healthy subjects and 81 patients with renal lesions (56 cases of renal carcinoma, 18 lesions of 12 cases of renal angiomyolipoma, and 21 lesions of 13 cases of renal cysts). Conventional magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging were carried out. We measured the average ADC value of the renal lesions and normal kidneys. ADC maps from different b values were generated by a statistical package.

Results

The ADC values of normal kidneys with three different motion-probing gradients(b=500, 800, 1000 sec/mm2) were 2.78 ± 0.14, × 10−3mm2s−1, 2.45 ± 0.13, × 10−3mm2s−1, 2.13 ± 0.14, × 10−3mm2s−1, respectively. The ADC values of renal cell carcinoma with three different motion-probing gradients(b=500, 800, 1000 sec/mm2) were 1.63 ± 0.14 × 10−3mm2s−1, 1.31± 0.18 × 10−3mm2s−1, 1.07 ± 0.15, 10−3mm2s−1, respectively. Among the renal cell carcinoma, the ADC value of clear cell type were 1.67 ± 0.09, × 10−3mm2s−1, 1.36 ± 0.13, × 10−3mm2s−1, 1.15 ± 0.14, × 10−3mm2s−1, respectively; the ADC values of granular cell type were 1.59 ± 0.19, × 10−3mm2s−1, 1.25 ± 0.22, × 10−3mm2s−1, 0.97 ± 0.12, × 10−3mm2s−1, respectively. The ADC values of renal angiomyolipoma with three different motion-probing gradients(b=500, 800, 1000 sec/mm2) were 0.88± 0.08, 10−3mm2s−1, 0.63 ± 0.07, × 10−3mm2s−1, 0.43 ± 0.04, × 10−3mm2s−1, respectively. The ADC values of renal cystic lesions with three different motion-probing gradients(b=500, 800, 1000 sec/mm2) were 3.73 ± 0.18, × 10−3mm2s−1, 3.44 ± 0.13, × 10−3mm2s−1, 3.09 ± 0.21, × 10−3mm2s−1, respectively. Statistically significant differences exists between the ADC values of normal kidney, renal carcinomas, renal angiomyolipomas and renal cysts when the b value is the same. Among the different cell types of renal carcinomas, the ADC value of granular cell carcinoma is lower than that of clear cell carcinomas.

Conclusion

It is of benefit in diagnosing and distinguishing between benign and malignant renal tumors to know the ADC values in diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Furthermore, these values help to know the internal structure of the tumor and the tumor typel, which is helpful to the treatment and in predicting the patient's prognosis.

弥散加权磁共振成像表观扩散系数(ADC)在常见肾脏疾病诊断中的价值
目的探讨常见肾脏疾病弥散加权磁共振成像的表观弥散系数(ADC)的价值。方法选取健康体检者30例,肾脏病变81例(肾癌56例,肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤12例,肾囊肿13例,21例)。进行常规磁共振成像和扩散加权磁共振成像。我们测量了肾脏病变和正常肾脏的平均ADC值。通过统计包生成不同b值的ADC图。结果3种不同运动探测梯度(b=500、800、1000 sec/mm2)下正常肾脏的ADC值分别为2.78±0.14、× 10−3mm2s−1、2.45±0.13、× 10−3mm2s−1、2.13±0.14、× 10−3mm2s−1。三种不同运动探测梯度(b=500、800、1000 sec/mm2)下肾癌ADC值分别为1.63±0.14 × 10−3mm2s−1、1.31±0.18 × 10−3mm2s−1、1.07±0.15、10−3mm2s−1。在肾细胞癌中,透明细胞型的ADC值分别为1.67±0.09、× 10−3mm2s−1、1.36±0.13、× 10−3mm2s−1、1.15±0.14、× 10−3mm2s−1;颗粒细胞型的ADC值分别为1.59±0.19、× 10−3mm2s−1、1.25±0.22、× 10−3mm2s−1、0.97±0.12、× 10−3mm2s−1。3种不同运动探测梯度(b=500、800、1000 sec/mm2)下肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤的ADC值分别为0.88±0.08、10−3mm2s−1、0.63±0.07、× 10−3mm2s−1、0.43±0.04、× 10−3mm2s−1。三种不同运动探测梯度(b=500、800、1000 sec/mm2)下肾囊性病变的ADC值分别为3.73±0.18、× 10−3mm2s−1、3.44±0.13、× 10−3mm2s−1、3.09±0.21、× 10−3mm2s−1。在b值相同的情况下,正常肾脏、肾癌、肾血管平滑肌脂肪瘤和肾囊肿的ADC值差异有统计学意义。在不同细胞类型的肾癌中,颗粒细胞癌的ADC值低于透明细胞癌。结论了解弥散加权磁共振成像ADC值对肾脏良恶性肿瘤的诊断和鉴别具有重要意义。此外,这些值有助于了解肿瘤的内部结构和肿瘤类型,有助于治疗和预测患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信