Diversity, Multilingualism and Democratic Practices in Nepal

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
B. Gautam, Prem Prasad Poudel
{"title":"Diversity, Multilingualism and Democratic Practices in Nepal","authors":"B. Gautam, Prem Prasad Poudel","doi":"10.1163/21983534-09010004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis paper presents the relationship among Nepal’s linguistic diversity, multilingualism, and democratic practices by bringing into ideas from the global north and global south. The guiding question for exploring this relationship is, “why is Nepal’s linguistic diversity being squeezed despite the formulation of democratic and inclusive language policies that intended to promote multilingualism?”. To investigate this concern, qualitative data were obtained from semi-structured interviews with two purposively selected high-profile people working in the capacity of language policymaking in the state agencies. In Nepal, although democracy promoted awareness towards the issue of language rights and the need of preservation and promotion of minority languages, the narrowing of multilingual diversity continued in practice. This study concluded that democracy allowed neoliberal ideologies to penetrate sociolinguistic spaces and put greater emphasis on English and Nepali. While there is an intertwined relationship between linguistic diversity, democracy, and multilingualism, the ongoing democratic practices have become counterproductive in maintaining the linguistic diversity leading to the marginalization of minority and lesser-known languages. Also, despite ample literature documenting linguistic diversity as a resource and opportunity, the notions of ‘linguistic diversity’ and ‘multilingualism’ were utilized merely as political agendas and issues of critical discourses which have left negligible impact on changing the conventionalized practices of linguistic domination of Nepali and English. Therefore, we question the co-existence of diversity and democracy and claim that democracy alone does not necessarily contribute to the protection of linguistic diversity. In line with this concept, democratic practices could even be counterproductive in the promotion and protection of linguistic diversity. Our findings suggest future interventions about essentializing the use of minority languages in education and governance, alongside democracy providing the fertile grounds for policy pitches to address micro problems in maintaining multilingualism within a democracy.","PeriodicalId":40791,"journal":{"name":"Majalah Kedokteran Bandung-MKB-Bandung Medical Journal","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Majalah Kedokteran Bandung-MKB-Bandung Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/21983534-09010004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper presents the relationship among Nepal’s linguistic diversity, multilingualism, and democratic practices by bringing into ideas from the global north and global south. The guiding question for exploring this relationship is, “why is Nepal’s linguistic diversity being squeezed despite the formulation of democratic and inclusive language policies that intended to promote multilingualism?”. To investigate this concern, qualitative data were obtained from semi-structured interviews with two purposively selected high-profile people working in the capacity of language policymaking in the state agencies. In Nepal, although democracy promoted awareness towards the issue of language rights and the need of preservation and promotion of minority languages, the narrowing of multilingual diversity continued in practice. This study concluded that democracy allowed neoliberal ideologies to penetrate sociolinguistic spaces and put greater emphasis on English and Nepali. While there is an intertwined relationship between linguistic diversity, democracy, and multilingualism, the ongoing democratic practices have become counterproductive in maintaining the linguistic diversity leading to the marginalization of minority and lesser-known languages. Also, despite ample literature documenting linguistic diversity as a resource and opportunity, the notions of ‘linguistic diversity’ and ‘multilingualism’ were utilized merely as political agendas and issues of critical discourses which have left negligible impact on changing the conventionalized practices of linguistic domination of Nepali and English. Therefore, we question the co-existence of diversity and democracy and claim that democracy alone does not necessarily contribute to the protection of linguistic diversity. In line with this concept, democratic practices could even be counterproductive in the promotion and protection of linguistic diversity. Our findings suggest future interventions about essentializing the use of minority languages in education and governance, alongside democracy providing the fertile grounds for policy pitches to address micro problems in maintaining multilingualism within a democracy.
尼泊尔的多样性、多语言和民主实践
本文通过引入全球北方和全球南方的思想,展示了尼泊尔的语言多样性、多语言和民主实践之间的关系。探究这种关系的指导性问题是,“尽管尼泊尔制定了旨在促进多种语言使用的民主和包容的语言政策,但为什么语言多样性受到挤压?”为了调查这一问题,我们从半结构化访谈中获得了定性数据,访谈对象是有意选择的两名在国家机构从事语言政策制定工作的知名人士。在尼泊尔,虽然民主促进了人们对语言权利问题的认识以及保护和促进少数民族语言的必要性,但实际上,多语言多样性继续缩小。这项研究的结论是,民主允许新自由主义意识形态渗透到社会语言空间,并更加强调英语和尼泊尔语。虽然语言多样性、民主和多语言之间存在着相互交织的关系,但正在进行的民主实践在维护语言多样性方面已经适得其反,导致少数民族和不太知名的语言被边缘化。此外,尽管有大量文献记录语言多样性是一种资源和机会,但“语言多样性”和“多语言”的概念仅仅被用作政治议程和批评话语的问题,对改变尼泊尔语和英语的语言统治的传统做法的影响微乎其微。因此,我们质疑多样性与民主的共存,并声称民主本身并不一定有助于保护语言多样性。根据这一概念,民主做法在促进和保护语言多样性方面甚至可能适得其反。我们的研究结果表明,未来的干预措施是在教育和治理中使用少数民族语言,同时为政策宣传提供肥沃的土壤,以解决在民主国家内维持多语言使用的微观问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信