ASPECTOS LEGAIS E JURISPRUDENCIAIS SOBRE RESCISÃO DE CONTRATO DE COMPRA E VENDA DE BEM IMÓVEL EM ALIENAÇÃO FIDUCIÁRIA

IF 0.1 Q4 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Gláucia Maria Moraes de Oliveira, Jairo Postal Júnior
{"title":"ASPECTOS LEGAIS E JURISPRUDENCIAIS SOBRE RESCISÃO DE CONTRATO DE COMPRA E VENDA DE BEM IMÓVEL EM ALIENAÇÃO FIDUCIÁRIA","authors":"Gláucia Maria Moraes de Oliveira, Jairo Postal Júnior","doi":"10.18066/REVISTAUNIVAP.V27I53.2485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses legal aspects and jurisprudence on the unilateral termination by the buyer of contracts for the purchase and sale of real estate under fiduciary alienation, based on a theoretical provision. Considering that it is a relationship of consumption, the proposals of article 53 of the Consumer Protection Code (CDC) are also presented and discussed, which states that the clauses establishing the total loss of the installments paid by the promising buyer are null and void, in case of default and contract termination. The present theme still generates controversy in the legal environment. Nevertheless, the issue is pacified by Precedent 543 of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), which, as a precaution, established the total or partial refund of the installments paid, in a reciprocal manner a promising buyer a promising seller / builder, in the hypothesis of contractual resolution. Based on the study, a proposal is made on the possibility of the buyer undertaking to terminate the purchase and sale contract guaranteed in fiduciary alienation, by reimbursement of the installments already paid in successive installments of the contract, as well as the verification of the possibility of application of the necessary joint agreement between the promising seller and the financial institution. 1 Associação dos Advogados do Estado de São Paulo AASP. 2 Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo TJSP.","PeriodicalId":40782,"journal":{"name":"Revista Univap","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Univap","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18066/REVISTAUNIVAP.V27I53.2485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper discusses legal aspects and jurisprudence on the unilateral termination by the buyer of contracts for the purchase and sale of real estate under fiduciary alienation, based on a theoretical provision. Considering that it is a relationship of consumption, the proposals of article 53 of the Consumer Protection Code (CDC) are also presented and discussed, which states that the clauses establishing the total loss of the installments paid by the promising buyer are null and void, in case of default and contract termination. The present theme still generates controversy in the legal environment. Nevertheless, the issue is pacified by Precedent 543 of the Superior Court of Justice (STJ), which, as a precaution, established the total or partial refund of the installments paid, in a reciprocal manner a promising buyer a promising seller / builder, in the hypothesis of contractual resolution. Based on the study, a proposal is made on the possibility of the buyer undertaking to terminate the purchase and sale contract guaranteed in fiduciary alienation, by reimbursement of the installments already paid in successive installments of the contract, as well as the verification of the possibility of application of the necessary joint agreement between the promising seller and the financial institution. 1 Associação dos Advogados do Estado de São Paulo AASP. 2 Tribunal de Justiça do Estado de São Paulo TJSP.
关于以信托方式出售不动产的买卖合同终止的法律和法理学方面
本文以一项理论规定为基础,探讨了信托转让条件下买受人单方面解除房地产买卖合同的法律问题和法理依据。考虑到这是一种消费关系,还提出并讨论了《消费者保护法》(CDC)第53条的提案。该提案规定,在违约和合同终止的情况下,有希望的买方支付分期付款的全部损失条款无效。目前的主题仍然在法律环境中引起争议。然而,高等法院第543号判例平息了这一问题,该判例作为预防措施,在合同解决的假设下,以互惠的方式确定了有希望的买方和有希望的卖方/建筑商对已支付的分期付款的全部或部分退款。在研究的基础上,提出了买方承诺终止信托转让担保的买卖合同的可能性,通过偿还在合同的连续分期中已经支付的分期,以及验证有希望的卖方和金融机构之间适用必要的联合协议的可能性。1圣保罗州辩护律师协会;2圣保罗州司法法庭。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Univap
Revista Univap MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信