Poor written pragmatic skills are associated with internalising symptoms in childhood: evidence from a UK birth cohort study

Kalim Ahmed, E. Flouri, G. Vigliocco
{"title":"Poor written pragmatic skills are associated with internalising symptoms in childhood: evidence from a UK birth cohort study","authors":"Kalim Ahmed, E. Flouri, G. Vigliocco","doi":"10.3389/frcha.2023.1075836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction This study examined the relation between pragmatic language and internalising (depressive and anxiety) symptoms in 11-year-olds, using data from the 1958 British birth cohort study. Methods The cohort children were asked at age 11 to write an essay on their life as they imagined it would be at age 25. We analysed 200 of these essays for relevance, organisation and context-dependent references. Results We found associations between these aspects of pragmatic language and children's internalising symptom scores across parent and teacher ratings, even after adjustment for cognitive ability, socioeconomic position and structural language. Most notably, children writing more coherent essays had fewer teacher-rated internalising symptoms, after adjustment for confounders. Additionally, children who provided more relevant and varied information about their imagined future home-lives had fewer parent-rated internalising symptoms, after adjustment for confounders. Discussion The unique associations between pragmatic language skills and internalising symptoms observed are notable but preliminary, highlighting both the need for further research and potential applications for risk-assessment tools.","PeriodicalId":73074,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in child and adolescent psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2023.1075836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction This study examined the relation between pragmatic language and internalising (depressive and anxiety) symptoms in 11-year-olds, using data from the 1958 British birth cohort study. Methods The cohort children were asked at age 11 to write an essay on their life as they imagined it would be at age 25. We analysed 200 of these essays for relevance, organisation and context-dependent references. Results We found associations between these aspects of pragmatic language and children's internalising symptom scores across parent and teacher ratings, even after adjustment for cognitive ability, socioeconomic position and structural language. Most notably, children writing more coherent essays had fewer teacher-rated internalising symptoms, after adjustment for confounders. Additionally, children who provided more relevant and varied information about their imagined future home-lives had fewer parent-rated internalising symptoms, after adjustment for confounders. Discussion The unique associations between pragmatic language skills and internalising symptoms observed are notable but preliminary, highlighting both the need for further research and potential applications for risk-assessment tools.
糟糕的书面实用技能与童年内化症状有关:来自英国出生队列研究的证据
本研究利用1958年英国出生队列研究的数据,研究了11岁儿童的语用性语言与内化(抑郁和焦虑)症状之间的关系。方法研究人员要求同龄儿童在11岁时写一篇文章,描述他们想象中的25岁时的生活。我们分析了其中200篇文章的相关性,组织和上下文相关参考。结果我们发现,即使在调整了认知能力、社会经济地位和结构语言之后,语用语言的这些方面与儿童内化症状在家长和老师评分中的得分之间也存在关联。最值得注意的是,在对混杂因素进行调整后,写得更连贯的文章的孩子有更少的老师评价的内化症状。此外,在对混杂因素进行调整后,提供更多相关和多样化的关于他们想象的未来家庭生活的信息的儿童有更少的父母评价的内化症状。所观察到的语用语言技能和内化症状之间的独特联系是值得注意的,但只是初步的,强调了进一步研究的必要性和风险评估工具的潜在应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信