Inventing Islam(ism): De-Islamization under Secular Authoritarianism in Bangladesh

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Md Ashraf Aziz Ishrak Fahim
{"title":"Inventing Islam(ism): De-Islamization under Secular Authoritarianism in Bangladesh","authors":"Md Ashraf Aziz Ishrak Fahim","doi":"10.13169/reorient.7.2.0158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The presence of Islamism in Muslimistan necessitates a secular age, as only in a secular age does it become possible to be for or against Islam due to the decentering of Islam as the default organizing premise of Muslim societies. Within this fundamental de-Islamization or secularization of Muslim societies, further de-Islamization is made possible by secular power’s ability to dictate and even produce Islam, which continues to perpetually shift the meanings of secularism and Islamism in accordance with the European Enlightenment’s notion of progress. The banality and universality of secularism, and markedness and provinciality of Islam(ism), ensure that only the (perceived) absence of secularism and (perceived) presence of Islamism are felt – never the other way around. Bangladesh’s recent authoritarian turn, its social engineering during secular authoritarianism, and the recent calls for democratization – all point towards the secularist politics of de-Islamization which invents Islam(ism) in de-Islamization, and which then explains the failings of secularism through the regime and Bangladesh’s “Islamist character”. The implications include a never-ending de-Islamization process, spelling the end of the post-Islamism thesis, as post-Islamism becomes an impossible state. Secular power invents in post-Islamism a new Islamism, delaying the post-Islamist moment ad infinitum.","PeriodicalId":36347,"journal":{"name":"ReOrient","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ReOrient","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/reorient.7.2.0158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presence of Islamism in Muslimistan necessitates a secular age, as only in a secular age does it become possible to be for or against Islam due to the decentering of Islam as the default organizing premise of Muslim societies. Within this fundamental de-Islamization or secularization of Muslim societies, further de-Islamization is made possible by secular power’s ability to dictate and even produce Islam, which continues to perpetually shift the meanings of secularism and Islamism in accordance with the European Enlightenment’s notion of progress. The banality and universality of secularism, and markedness and provinciality of Islam(ism), ensure that only the (perceived) absence of secularism and (perceived) presence of Islamism are felt – never the other way around. Bangladesh’s recent authoritarian turn, its social engineering during secular authoritarianism, and the recent calls for democratization – all point towards the secularist politics of de-Islamization which invents Islam(ism) in de-Islamization, and which then explains the failings of secularism through the regime and Bangladesh’s “Islamist character”. The implications include a never-ending de-Islamization process, spelling the end of the post-Islamism thesis, as post-Islamism becomes an impossible state. Secular power invents in post-Islamism a new Islamism, delaying the post-Islamist moment ad infinitum.
发明伊斯兰(主义):孟加拉国世俗威权主义下的去伊斯兰化
伊斯兰教在穆斯林中的存在需要一个世俗的时代,因为只有在世俗的时代才有可能支持或反对伊斯兰教,因为伊斯兰教的去中心化是穆斯林社会默认的组织前提。在穆斯林社会的这种基本的去伊斯兰化或世俗化中,进一步的去伊斯兰化是可能的,因为世俗权力有能力支配甚至产生伊斯兰教,它继续按照欧洲启蒙运动的进步概念不断地改变世俗主义和伊斯兰主义的意义。世俗主义的平庸和普遍性,以及伊斯兰教(主义)的显著性和地方性,确保了人们只会感觉到世俗主义的缺失和伊斯兰主义的存在——而不是相反。孟加拉国最近的威权主义转向,它在世俗威权主义期间的社会工程,以及最近对民主化的呼吁——所有这些都指向非伊斯兰化的世俗主义政治,这种政治在非伊斯兰化中发明了伊斯兰(主义),然后通过政权和孟加拉国的“伊斯兰特征”解释了世俗主义的失败。其含义包括一个永无止境的去伊斯兰化过程,意味着后伊斯兰主义论点的终结,因为后伊斯兰主义成为一个不可能的国家。世俗权力在后伊斯兰主义中发明了一种新的伊斯兰主义,无限期地推迟了后伊斯兰主义的到来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ReOrient
ReOrient Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信