REPRESENTAÇÃO SOCIAL DO IDOSO NOS ASPECTOS CRONOLÓGICOS, BIOLÓGICOS E SOCIAL.

Kawane De Souza Gonçalves, Deoclécio Rocco Gruppi
{"title":"REPRESENTAÇÃO SOCIAL DO IDOSO NOS ASPECTOS CRONOLÓGICOS, BIOLÓGICOS E SOCIAL.","authors":"Kawane De Souza Gonçalves, Deoclécio Rocco Gruppi","doi":"10.16887/90.a1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to IBGE, the age group of the population had a significant increase from 2012, where life expectancy in 1940 was 45.5, and in 2018 is 76.2 years in men and 79.8 years in women. The way that the elderly are seen and treated by society ends up giving a non-real image, because old age began to be treated as a stage of life characterized by physical decay and absence of social roles from the second half of the nineteenth century. This research intends to contribute to the analysis of how the current society sees and treats the old age, and trying to answer questions of if the prejudice exists, and what it represents to be \"old\" in the conception of these elderly. The methodology to be used is qualitative and quantitative. Based on the literature review, historical data, and the application of a small WHOQOL-bref questionnaire adapted for the elderly, to be answered by older people from 60 years old. Selected and qualitatively articulated bibliographies. This information will be analyzed to dialogue with the official documentation in the investigation, privileged to explain the social historical process of the elderly. The results show that seniors have autonomy, and have active social participation, and that age does not prevent them from accomplishing what they want efficiently.","PeriodicalId":12278,"journal":{"name":"FIEP Bulletin On-line","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FIEP Bulletin On-line","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16887/90.a1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to IBGE, the age group of the population had a significant increase from 2012, where life expectancy in 1940 was 45.5, and in 2018 is 76.2 years in men and 79.8 years in women. The way that the elderly are seen and treated by society ends up giving a non-real image, because old age began to be treated as a stage of life characterized by physical decay and absence of social roles from the second half of the nineteenth century. This research intends to contribute to the analysis of how the current society sees and treats the old age, and trying to answer questions of if the prejudice exists, and what it represents to be "old" in the conception of these elderly. The methodology to be used is qualitative and quantitative. Based on the literature review, historical data, and the application of a small WHOQOL-bref questionnaire adapted for the elderly, to be answered by older people from 60 years old. Selected and qualitatively articulated bibliographies. This information will be analyzed to dialogue with the official documentation in the investigation, privileged to explain the social historical process of the elderly. The results show that seniors have autonomy, and have active social participation, and that age does not prevent them from accomplishing what they want efficiently.
老年人在时间、生物学和社会方面的社会代表性。
根据IBGE的数据,人口年龄组比2012年有了显着增长,1940年的预期寿命为45.5岁,2018年男性为76.2岁,女性为79.8岁。老年人被社会看待和对待的方式最终给了一个非真实的形象,因为老年开始被视为一个以身体衰退和社会角色缺失为特征的生命阶段,从19世纪后半叶开始。本研究旨在分析当前社会如何看待和对待老年人,并试图回答偏见是否存在的问题,以及在这些老年人的概念中,“老”代表什么。所采用的方法是定性和定量的。基于文献综述、历史资料,并应用适用于老年人的小型whoqol - brief问卷,由60岁以上的老年人回答。选定和定性铰接书目。这些资料将在调查中与官方文件对话分析,有利于解释老年人的社会历史进程。结果表明,老年人具有自主性,积极参与社会活动,年龄并不妨碍他们有效地完成自己想要的事情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信