Is induced abortion becoming a family planning method in Ghana?: A situational analysis of induce abortion and contraception uptake in two urban cities of Ghana

F. Y. Gbagbo, Josephine Akosua Gbagbo
{"title":"Is induced abortion becoming a family planning method in Ghana?: A situational analysis of induce abortion and contraception uptake in two urban cities of Ghana","authors":"F. Y. Gbagbo, Josephine Akosua Gbagbo","doi":"10.36811/IJRMSH.2019.110002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Following amendment of Ghanaian abortion law in 1985, abortion services became more available as permitted by law. Services data however remain scares due to provider and facility stigmatization.\n\nObjective: To explore the use of abortion as a family planning option using provider reports, trends of contraception and induced abortion service uptake in facilities within two urban cities in Ghana.\n\nMethods: Cross-sectional, descriptive design, using facility data from 50 private (42) and Non-Governmental Organizations (8). Ten in-depth interviews were also held with midwife providers (6) and medical officers (4) between January 2010 and December 2017 in Accra and Kumasi Metropolises.\n\nResults: Facility patronage of abortion services in Accra and Kumasi Metropolises increase steadily each year with contraception uptake. Abortion services in NGO facilities were however reported as target driven and providers’ performances/bonuses were tied to meeting set targets thereby encouraging abortion on demand. Whereas NGO facilities provide both abortion and full contraception method mix, majority (38 out of 42) of private facilities provide only abortion services. Those providing contraception focus mainly on short term methods (pills and injections) due to lack of interest and/or trained providers. There are more midwife lead abortion providing facilities in Accra (40) than in Kumasi (10). Where midwives provided abortion services, contraceptives were readily available and clients encouraged to take a method following abortion. This practice was very common in NGO facilities as post abortion contraception was reported to be a mandatory package.\n\nConclusions: The Ghanaian abortion law allows conditional abortion and not on demand. However, increasing numbers of abortions in the study area coupled with reported target setting for abortion services suggest abortion on demand and its being used as a family planning option. A nationwide facility based assessment of abortion and contraception service delivery is recommended to inform policy.","PeriodicalId":14247,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Reproductive Medicine and Sexual Health","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Reproductive Medicine and Sexual Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36811/IJRMSH.2019.110002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Following amendment of Ghanaian abortion law in 1985, abortion services became more available as permitted by law. Services data however remain scares due to provider and facility stigmatization. Objective: To explore the use of abortion as a family planning option using provider reports, trends of contraception and induced abortion service uptake in facilities within two urban cities in Ghana. Methods: Cross-sectional, descriptive design, using facility data from 50 private (42) and Non-Governmental Organizations (8). Ten in-depth interviews were also held with midwife providers (6) and medical officers (4) between January 2010 and December 2017 in Accra and Kumasi Metropolises. Results: Facility patronage of abortion services in Accra and Kumasi Metropolises increase steadily each year with contraception uptake. Abortion services in NGO facilities were however reported as target driven and providers’ performances/bonuses were tied to meeting set targets thereby encouraging abortion on demand. Whereas NGO facilities provide both abortion and full contraception method mix, majority (38 out of 42) of private facilities provide only abortion services. Those providing contraception focus mainly on short term methods (pills and injections) due to lack of interest and/or trained providers. There are more midwife lead abortion providing facilities in Accra (40) than in Kumasi (10). Where midwives provided abortion services, contraceptives were readily available and clients encouraged to take a method following abortion. This practice was very common in NGO facilities as post abortion contraception was reported to be a mandatory package. Conclusions: The Ghanaian abortion law allows conditional abortion and not on demand. However, increasing numbers of abortions in the study area coupled with reported target setting for abortion services suggest abortion on demand and its being used as a family planning option. A nationwide facility based assessment of abortion and contraception service delivery is recommended to inform policy.
在加纳,人工流产是否成为一种计划生育方法?:加纳两个城市的人工流产和避孕情况分析
背景:1985年加纳修改堕胎法后,在法律允许的情况下,堕胎服务变得更加容易获得。然而,由于供应商和设施的污名化,服务数据仍然令人恐惧。目的:利用提供者报告、避孕和人工流产服务在加纳两个城市内设施的发展趋势,探讨堕胎作为一种计划生育选择的使用。方法:采用横断面描述性设计,使用来自50家私营(42家)和非政府组织(8家)的设施数据。2010年1月至2017年12月期间,还对阿克拉和库马西大都市的助产士(6家)和医务人员(4家)进行了10次深度访谈。结果:阿克拉和库马西两大城市堕胎服务设施的使用率随着避孕措施的采用逐年稳步上升。然而,据报道,非政府组织设施中的堕胎服务是目标驱动的,提供者的业绩/奖金与达到既定目标挂钩,从而鼓励按需堕胎。非政府机构提供堕胎和全面避孕方法,而大多数(42个机构中有38个)私人机构只提供堕胎服务。由于缺乏兴趣和/或训练有素的提供者,提供避孕措施的机构主要侧重于短期方法(药丸和注射)。阿克拉(40名)比库马西(10名)有更多的助产士提供堕胎服务。在助产士提供堕胎服务的地方,可以随时获得避孕药具,并鼓励客户在堕胎后采取避孕措施。这种做法在非政府组织的设施中非常普遍,因为据报道堕胎后避孕是一项强制性措施。结论:加纳堕胎法允许有条件堕胎,而不是按要求堕胎。然而,研究地区的堕胎数量不断增加,加上报告的堕胎服务目标设定,表明按需堕胎并将其作为计划生育选择。建议在全国范围内对堕胎和避孕服务提供情况进行评估,以便为政策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信