[A prospective randomized controlled study on the effects of bicycle ergometer rehabilitation training on quadriceps and walking ability of patients with lower limb dysfunction caused by extensive burns].

IF 2.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
K P Wu, P Chen, T F Ru, L Yuan, H Luo, W G Xie
{"title":"[A prospective randomized controlled study on the effects of bicycle ergometer rehabilitation training on quadriceps and walking ability of patients with lower limb dysfunction caused by extensive burns].","authors":"K P Wu, P Chen, T F Ru, L Yuan, H Luo, W G Xie","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210221-00060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To explore the effects of bicycle ergometer rehabilitation training on quadriceps and walking ability of patients with lower limb dysfunction caused by extensive burns. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. A total of 40 patients with extensive burns who met the inclusion criteria and were admitted to Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University&Wuhan Third Hospital from December 2017 to December 2020 were selected. According to the random number table, the patients were divided into conventional training group (16 males, 4 females, aged (45±10) years) and combined training group (13 males, 7 females, aged (39±8) years). Patients in conventional training group were given conventional rehabilitation therapy such as joint loosening, lower limb strength training, walking training, and pressure therapy, while patients in combined training group were given additional bicycle ergometer rehabilitation training on the basis of conventional rehabilitation. For patients in the 2 groups before and after a 2-month's treatment, the thickness of quadriceps was measured by ultrasonic diagnostic instrument, the muscle strength of quadriceps was measured by portable muscle strength tester, the walking ability was tested with a 6-min and a 10-meter walk tests, and the patients' satisfaction for treatment effects was assessed using the modified Likert scale. Data were statistically analyzed with independent or paired sample <i>t</i> test, Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, or chi-square test. <b>Results:</b> After 2-month's treatment, the quadriceps thickness of patients in combined training group was (3.76±0.39) cm, which was significantly thicker than (3.45±0.35) cm in conventional training group (<i>t</i>=2.67, <i>P</i><0.05); quadriceps thickness of patients in conventional training group and combined training group after 2-month's treatment was significantly thicker than that before treatment (with <i>t</i> values of 5.99 and 8.62, respectively, <i>P</i><0.01). After 2-month's treatment, the quadriceps muscle strength of patients in combined training group was significantly greater than that in conventional training group (<i>Z</i>=2.69, <i>P</i><0.01); quadriceps muscle strength of patients in conventional training group and combined training group after 2-month's treatment was significantly greater than that before treatment (with <i>Z</i> values of 3.92 and 3.92, respectively, <i>P</i><0.01). After 2-month's treatment, the 6-min walking distance of patients in combined training group was (488±39) m, which was significantly longer than (429±25) m in conventional training group (<i>t</i>=5.66, <i>P</i><0.01); the 6-min walking distance of patients after 2-month's treatment in conventional training group and combined training group was significantly longer than that before treatment (with <i>t</i> values of 13.16 and 17.92, respectively, <i>P</i><0.01). After 2-month's treatment, the 10-meter walking time of patients in combined training group was significantly shorter than that in conventional training group (<i>t</i>=3.20, <i>P</i><0.01); and the 10-meter walking time in conventional training group and combined training group was significantly shorter than that before treatment (with <i>t</i> values of 7.21 and 13.13, respectively, <i>P</i><0.01). The patients' satisfaction score for treatment effects in combined training group was significantly higher than that in conventional training group (<i>Z</i>=3.14, <i>P</i><0.01), and the patients' satisfaction scores for treatment effects in conventional training group and combined training group after 2-month's treatment were significantly greater than those before treatment (with <i>Z</i> values of 3.98 and 4.04, respectively, <i>P</i><0.01). <b>Conclusions:</b> Bicycle ergometer rehabilitation training can be used to improve quadriceps thickness, muscle strength, and walking ability of patients with lower limb dysfunction caused by extensive burns. It can also improve the satisfaction of patients with the treatment outcome, and therefore is worthy of promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":46464,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Urban Sciences","volume":"24 1","pages":"447-453"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Urban Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn501120-20210221-00060","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore the effects of bicycle ergometer rehabilitation training on quadriceps and walking ability of patients with lower limb dysfunction caused by extensive burns. Methods: A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted. A total of 40 patients with extensive burns who met the inclusion criteria and were admitted to Tongren Hospital of Wuhan University&Wuhan Third Hospital from December 2017 to December 2020 were selected. According to the random number table, the patients were divided into conventional training group (16 males, 4 females, aged (45±10) years) and combined training group (13 males, 7 females, aged (39±8) years). Patients in conventional training group were given conventional rehabilitation therapy such as joint loosening, lower limb strength training, walking training, and pressure therapy, while patients in combined training group were given additional bicycle ergometer rehabilitation training on the basis of conventional rehabilitation. For patients in the 2 groups before and after a 2-month's treatment, the thickness of quadriceps was measured by ultrasonic diagnostic instrument, the muscle strength of quadriceps was measured by portable muscle strength tester, the walking ability was tested with a 6-min and a 10-meter walk tests, and the patients' satisfaction for treatment effects was assessed using the modified Likert scale. Data were statistically analyzed with independent or paired sample t test, Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, or chi-square test. Results: After 2-month's treatment, the quadriceps thickness of patients in combined training group was (3.76±0.39) cm, which was significantly thicker than (3.45±0.35) cm in conventional training group (t=2.67, P<0.05); quadriceps thickness of patients in conventional training group and combined training group after 2-month's treatment was significantly thicker than that before treatment (with t values of 5.99 and 8.62, respectively, P<0.01). After 2-month's treatment, the quadriceps muscle strength of patients in combined training group was significantly greater than that in conventional training group (Z=2.69, P<0.01); quadriceps muscle strength of patients in conventional training group and combined training group after 2-month's treatment was significantly greater than that before treatment (with Z values of 3.92 and 3.92, respectively, P<0.01). After 2-month's treatment, the 6-min walking distance of patients in combined training group was (488±39) m, which was significantly longer than (429±25) m in conventional training group (t=5.66, P<0.01); the 6-min walking distance of patients after 2-month's treatment in conventional training group and combined training group was significantly longer than that before treatment (with t values of 13.16 and 17.92, respectively, P<0.01). After 2-month's treatment, the 10-meter walking time of patients in combined training group was significantly shorter than that in conventional training group (t=3.20, P<0.01); and the 10-meter walking time in conventional training group and combined training group was significantly shorter than that before treatment (with t values of 7.21 and 13.13, respectively, P<0.01). The patients' satisfaction score for treatment effects in combined training group was significantly higher than that in conventional training group (Z=3.14, P<0.01), and the patients' satisfaction scores for treatment effects in conventional training group and combined training group after 2-month's treatment were significantly greater than those before treatment (with Z values of 3.98 and 4.04, respectively, P<0.01). Conclusions: Bicycle ergometer rehabilitation training can be used to improve quadriceps thickness, muscle strength, and walking ability of patients with lower limb dysfunction caused by extensive burns. It can also improve the satisfaction of patients with the treatment outcome, and therefore is worthy of promotion.

[自行车测力计康复训练对大面积烧伤下肢功能障碍患者股四头肌和行走能力影响的前瞻性随机对照研究]。
目的探讨自行车测力计康复训练对大面积烧伤下肢功能障碍患者股四头肌和行走能力的影响。方法:进行前瞻性随机对照研究:进行前瞻性随机对照研究。选取武汉大学同仁医院暨武汉市第三医院2017年12月至2020年12月收治的符合纳入标准的大面积烧伤患者共40例。根据随机数字表将患者分为常规训练组(男16例,女4例,年龄(45±10)岁)和联合训练组(男13例,女7例,年龄(39±8)岁)。常规训练组患者给予关节松动、下肢力量训练、步行训练、压力治疗等常规康复治疗,联合训练组患者在常规康复治疗的基础上增加自行车测力计康复训练。两组患者在治疗前后各2个月,分别用超声波诊断仪测量股四头肌厚度,用便携式肌力测试仪测量股四头肌肌力,用6分钟和10米步行测试步行能力,用改良李克特量表评估患者对治疗效果的满意度。数据采用独立或配对样本 t 检验、曼-惠特尼 U 检验、Wilcoxon 符号秩检验或卡方检验进行统计分析。结果治疗 2 个月后,联合训练组患者的股四头肌厚度为(3.76±0.39)cm,明显比常规训练组的(3.45±0.35)cm 厚(t=2.67,Pt 值分别为 5.99 和 8.62,PZ=2)。62,PZ=2.69,PZ值分别为3.92和3.92,Pt=5.66,Pt值分别为13.16和17.92,Pt=3.20,Pt值分别为7.21和13.13,PZ=3.14,PZ值分别为3.98和4.04,PC结论:自行车测力计康复训练可用于改善大面积烧伤所致下肢功能障碍患者的股四头肌厚度、肌力和行走能力。它还能提高患者对治疗效果的满意度,因此值得推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信