Social Facts & the Semantic Conception of Norms. Customary Norms as a Test of Ontology

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Piero Mattei-Gentili
{"title":"Social Facts & the Semantic Conception of Norms. Customary Norms as a Test of Ontology","authors":"Piero Mattei-Gentili","doi":"10.17454/PAM-1915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The essay addresses the debates about the ontology of norms considering the case of accounting for customary norms. It undertakes and defends a stance in favor of a semantic ontology by developing a framework for the explanation of norms as abstract objects and their linking with social facts to be identified in categories like “customary”, “enacted”, “legal”, “grammatical”, and so on. Furthermore, the work addresses the rival conceptions (pragmatic and eclectic) by showing the specific impossibility that these face for giving a satisfactory account on customary norms. The inquiry concludes by exploring some possible insights from the philosophy of mind to explain the conceptual nature of norms as mental representations.","PeriodicalId":37133,"journal":{"name":"Phenomenology and Mind","volume":"127 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phenomenology and Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17454/PAM-1915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The essay addresses the debates about the ontology of norms considering the case of accounting for customary norms. It undertakes and defends a stance in favor of a semantic ontology by developing a framework for the explanation of norms as abstract objects and their linking with social facts to be identified in categories like “customary”, “enacted”, “legal”, “grammatical”, and so on. Furthermore, the work addresses the rival conceptions (pragmatic and eclectic) by showing the specific impossibility that these face for giving a satisfactory account on customary norms. The inquiry concludes by exploring some possible insights from the philosophy of mind to explain the conceptual nature of norms as mental representations.
社会事实与规范的语义概念。习惯规范作为本体论的检验
本文讨论了关于规范本体论的争论,考虑到习惯规范的会计情况。它通过发展一个框架来解释作为抽象对象的规范,以及它们与社会事实的联系,并将其识别为“习惯”、“制定”、“法律”、“语法”等类别,从而承担并捍卫了一种支持语义本体论的立场。此外,该工作通过展示这些概念在提供令人满意的习惯规范方面所面临的具体不可能性来解决竞争概念(实用主义和折衷主义)。调查最后通过探索一些可能的见解从心灵哲学来解释规范的概念本质作为心理表征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Phenomenology and Mind
Phenomenology and Mind Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信