Assessment of Differences in Small Farmer Uses of Produce and Determinants of Marketed Surplus of Green Grams and Pigeon Peas in Semi-arid Machakos County, Kenya

J. Wambua, M. Ngigi, L. Muhammad
{"title":"Assessment of Differences in Small Farmer Uses of Produce and Determinants of Marketed Surplus of Green Grams and Pigeon Peas in Semi-arid Machakos County, Kenya","authors":"J. Wambua, M. Ngigi, L. Muhammad","doi":"10.1080/00128325.2019.1597566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Small farmers in semi-arid areas of eastern Kenya produce green grams and pigeon peas for both subsistence and income. Because of this, it was important for a detailed investigation on the difficulty of raising marketed surplus (produce) of green grams and pigeon peas. The literature with respect to how small farmers differed in the uses of the produce and the determinants of marketed surplus is sparse. The objectives of the study therefore were to assess the differences in farm retention (for self-consumption, seed and payments in kind) and marketed surplus and to determine the factors affecting marketed surplus. Survey research design was selected for making the observations. Sampling of the households was done using a multistage technique. There were 364 households selected in two agro-ecological zones, each with 182 respondents. Data collection was done using a well-structured questionnaire. Data analysis was done using the IBM SPSS Statistics 21. One-way analysis of variance results indicated that farmers of green grams and pigeon peas differed significantly in the produce consumed, marketed and used as seed and in-kind transactions. Green grams farmers differed significantly at F(3, 1 452) = 11.420, p = 0.000, whereas pigeon peas small farmers at F(3, 1 452) = 21.680, p = 0.000. Multiple linear regression analysis results showed factors influencing farmers in marketed produce of green grams as area cultivated, yield and region of production at p = 0.01. Seeds and in-kind transactions showed positive effect at p = 0.05, whereas access to market information at p = 0.1. The factors influencing farmers on marketed production of pigeon peas were seeds and in-kind transactions and the price of output (p = 0.01). The study concluded that the design of policy interventions therefore needed to take account of small farmer variations and the factors influencing the marketed production of green grams and pigeon peas.","PeriodicalId":11421,"journal":{"name":"East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal","volume":"29 1","pages":"163 - 175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East African Agricultural and Forestry Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00128325.2019.1597566","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Small farmers in semi-arid areas of eastern Kenya produce green grams and pigeon peas for both subsistence and income. Because of this, it was important for a detailed investigation on the difficulty of raising marketed surplus (produce) of green grams and pigeon peas. The literature with respect to how small farmers differed in the uses of the produce and the determinants of marketed surplus is sparse. The objectives of the study therefore were to assess the differences in farm retention (for self-consumption, seed and payments in kind) and marketed surplus and to determine the factors affecting marketed surplus. Survey research design was selected for making the observations. Sampling of the households was done using a multistage technique. There were 364 households selected in two agro-ecological zones, each with 182 respondents. Data collection was done using a well-structured questionnaire. Data analysis was done using the IBM SPSS Statistics 21. One-way analysis of variance results indicated that farmers of green grams and pigeon peas differed significantly in the produce consumed, marketed and used as seed and in-kind transactions. Green grams farmers differed significantly at F(3, 1 452) = 11.420, p = 0.000, whereas pigeon peas small farmers at F(3, 1 452) = 21.680, p = 0.000. Multiple linear regression analysis results showed factors influencing farmers in marketed produce of green grams as area cultivated, yield and region of production at p = 0.01. Seeds and in-kind transactions showed positive effect at p = 0.05, whereas access to market information at p = 0.1. The factors influencing farmers on marketed production of pigeon peas were seeds and in-kind transactions and the price of output (p = 0.01). The study concluded that the design of policy interventions therefore needed to take account of small farmer variations and the factors influencing the marketed production of green grams and pigeon peas.
肯尼亚半干旱马查科斯县小农农产品利用差异及绿克和鸽豆市场盈余决定因素评估
肯尼亚东部半干旱地区的小农生产绿克豆和鸽豆,以维持生计和收入。因此,对绿克豆和鸽豆的市售剩余(产品)的提高难度进行详细调查具有重要意义。关于小农在产品使用和市场剩余决定因素方面的差异的文献很少。因此,研究的目的是评估农场保留(用于自我消费、种子和实物支付)和市场剩余的差异,并确定影响市场剩余的因素。采用调查研究设计进行观察。采用多阶段技术对住户进行抽样。在两个农业生态区选取了364户,每个区有182名受访者。数据收集使用结构良好的问卷。使用IBM SPSS Statistics 21进行数据分析。单因素方差分析结果表明,绿克豆和鸽豆农民在消费、销售和用作种子和实物交易的农产品方面存在显著差异。绿克农民差异显著,F(3,1 452) = 11.420, p = 0.000,而鸽豆小农差异显著,F(3,1 452) = 21.680, p = 0.000。多元线性回归分析结果显示,影响农户销售绿克产品的因素为种植面积、产量和产地,p = 0.01。种子和实物交易在p = 0.05时具有正影响,而获取市场信息在p = 0.1时具有正影响。影响农民市场生产鸽豆的因素是种子、实物交易和产出价格(p = 0.01)。这项研究的结论是,因此,政策干预的设计需要考虑到小农的变化以及影响绿克和鸽豆市场生产的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信