Duration of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Cochlear Implantation: A Systematic Review.

Smile Kajal, Archana Mishra, Pooja Gupta, Arvind Kumar Kairo
{"title":"Duration of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Cochlear Implantation: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Smile Kajal, Archana Mishra, Pooja Gupta, Arvind Kumar Kairo","doi":"10.5152/iao.2022.21454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Antibiotic prophylaxis is commonly given to all patients undergoing cochlear implant surgery. However, currently, there is no consensus if pro- phylactic usage of antibiotics in cochlear implantation accords any benefit and if the duration of such use varies according to the surgeon's experience or institutional preference. A systematic review was conducted to gather evidence on ideal duration for antibiotic prophylaxis rec- ommended for patients undergoing cochlear implantation. We registered the protocol in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021235079) and reported the systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analysis statement. Of the 278 screened articles, 6 full-text original articles satisfied the inclusion criteria and were included. There were a total of 2081 participants in these 6 retrospective studies and all studies except 1 included both adult and pediatric populations. Antibiotic therapy was given as intervention, either as single dose or multiple doses, and compared with other group(s) receiving either no antibiotic prophylaxis or a different duration of prophylaxis. Three studies did not find any significant difference between infection rates when a different duration of antibiotic prophylaxis was given, while 2 studies found a single dose to be more efficacious, and yet another study concluded that a longer dura- tion of antibiotic prophylaxis was more beneficial. Based on the available data, the ideal duration of post-operative antibiotic therapy to be given after cochlear implant surgery could not be defined. However, administrating a single dose of intraoperative antibiotic seems to be the most consistent practice so far.</p>","PeriodicalId":94238,"journal":{"name":"The journal of international advanced otology","volume":"90 1","pages":"269-275"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10682799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of international advanced otology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/iao.2022.21454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Antibiotic prophylaxis is commonly given to all patients undergoing cochlear implant surgery. However, currently, there is no consensus if pro- phylactic usage of antibiotics in cochlear implantation accords any benefit and if the duration of such use varies according to the surgeon's experience or institutional preference. A systematic review was conducted to gather evidence on ideal duration for antibiotic prophylaxis rec- ommended for patients undergoing cochlear implantation. We registered the protocol in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021235079) and reported the systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta- Analysis statement. Of the 278 screened articles, 6 full-text original articles satisfied the inclusion criteria and were included. There were a total of 2081 participants in these 6 retrospective studies and all studies except 1 included both adult and pediatric populations. Antibiotic therapy was given as intervention, either as single dose or multiple doses, and compared with other group(s) receiving either no antibiotic prophylaxis or a different duration of prophylaxis. Three studies did not find any significant difference between infection rates when a different duration of antibiotic prophylaxis was given, while 2 studies found a single dose to be more efficacious, and yet another study concluded that a longer dura- tion of antibiotic prophylaxis was more beneficial. Based on the available data, the ideal duration of post-operative antibiotic therapy to be given after cochlear implant surgery could not be defined. However, administrating a single dose of intraoperative antibiotic seems to be the most consistent practice so far.

人工耳蜗植入术中抗生素预防的持续时间:一项系统综述。
所有接受人工耳蜗手术的患者通常都给予抗生素预防治疗。然而,目前在人工耳蜗植入中术前使用抗生素是否有任何益处,以及抗生素使用的持续时间是否因外科医生的经验或机构偏好而异,尚无共识。对人工耳蜗植入术患者推荐的理想抗生素预防持续时间进行了系统评价。我们在国际前瞻性系统评价登记册(CRD42021235079)上注册了该方案,并按照系统评价和Meta分析声明的首选报告项目报告了系统评价。278篇筛选文章中,6篇全文原创文章符合纳入标准,被纳入。这6项回顾性研究共纳入2081名受试者,除1项研究外,其他研究均纳入成人和儿科人群。给予抗生素治疗作为干预,单剂量或多剂量,并与未接受抗生素预防或不同时间预防的其他组进行比较。三项研究没有发现不同抗生素预防持续时间的感染率之间有任何显著差异,而2项研究发现单剂量更有效,还有一项研究得出结论,更长时间的抗生素预防更有益。根据现有资料,人工耳蜗术后给予抗生素治疗的理想持续时间无法确定。然而,到目前为止,术中使用单剂量抗生素似乎是最一致的做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信