Effects of Adding Polyelectrolyte Complexes to the Papermaking Wet End on Paper Strength and Functionality

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
E. I. Wang, Y. Perng, J. Shyu, C. Hsieh
{"title":"Effects of Adding Polyelectrolyte Complexes to the Papermaking Wet End on Paper Strength and Functionality","authors":"E. I. Wang, Y. Perng, J. Shyu, C. Hsieh","doi":"10.7075/TJFS.201206.0163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main purpose of the study was to find ways of strengthening paper made from old corrugated containerboard (OCC) using the addition of cationic polyacrylamide (cPAM) and starch (CS) in conjunction with anionic PAM (aPAM) and starch (AS). Through modifying the wet-end conditions and modes of addition, we searched for optimal conditions to enhance paper strength, while in the meantime considering estimates of the drainage performance, production cost, and machine runnability. The results indicated that Percol 182, a cPAM, had the best enhancing efficacies on the tensile, burst, and folding strengths of the resulting paper. The amphoteric PAMs, Hercobond 6350 and PS 1280, had slightly inferior performances. While the aPAM, Percol 155, contributed to the tensile strength that was only better than an anionic starch, which had the worst burst strength. The tearing strength was highest when PS 1280 was used. Drainage effects of the additives differed according to the type and dose of the polyelectrolyte. Percol 182 significantly increased the freeness of the pulp, allowing water to drain faster. Hercobond 6350 was next, while Percol 155 significantly decreased the freeness of the pulp. When applying a fixed cPAM and CS to moderate the doses of an amphoteric PAM or aPAM, paper strengths varied with the polyelectrolyte complex used. For paper tensile strength, a pulp concentration of 1.00% and a tensile index Percol 182 dose of 1.00% were optimal, and the tensile indices of the resulting handsheets were optimized. However, when the cost factor was considered, then sequential CS/Percol 155 addition at a 0.75/0.25% dose was effective in elevating the tensile performance. For tearing strength, the sequential addition of CS with PS 1280 at doses of 0.25/0.75% and 0.50/0.50% was better. When cost was considered, adding CS and AS sequentially at a 0.75/0.25% or 0.50/0.50% dose was optimal for strength enhancement.","PeriodicalId":22180,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan Journal of Forest Science","volume":"18 1","pages":"163-175"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan Journal of Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7075/TJFS.201206.0163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The main purpose of the study was to find ways of strengthening paper made from old corrugated containerboard (OCC) using the addition of cationic polyacrylamide (cPAM) and starch (CS) in conjunction with anionic PAM (aPAM) and starch (AS). Through modifying the wet-end conditions and modes of addition, we searched for optimal conditions to enhance paper strength, while in the meantime considering estimates of the drainage performance, production cost, and machine runnability. The results indicated that Percol 182, a cPAM, had the best enhancing efficacies on the tensile, burst, and folding strengths of the resulting paper. The amphoteric PAMs, Hercobond 6350 and PS 1280, had slightly inferior performances. While the aPAM, Percol 155, contributed to the tensile strength that was only better than an anionic starch, which had the worst burst strength. The tearing strength was highest when PS 1280 was used. Drainage effects of the additives differed according to the type and dose of the polyelectrolyte. Percol 182 significantly increased the freeness of the pulp, allowing water to drain faster. Hercobond 6350 was next, while Percol 155 significantly decreased the freeness of the pulp. When applying a fixed cPAM and CS to moderate the doses of an amphoteric PAM or aPAM, paper strengths varied with the polyelectrolyte complex used. For paper tensile strength, a pulp concentration of 1.00% and a tensile index Percol 182 dose of 1.00% were optimal, and the tensile indices of the resulting handsheets were optimized. However, when the cost factor was considered, then sequential CS/Percol 155 addition at a 0.75/0.25% dose was effective in elevating the tensile performance. For tearing strength, the sequential addition of CS with PS 1280 at doses of 0.25/0.75% and 0.50/0.50% was better. When cost was considered, adding CS and AS sequentially at a 0.75/0.25% or 0.50/0.50% dose was optimal for strength enhancement.
造纸湿端添加聚电解质配合物对纸张强度和功能的影响
本研究的主要目的是寻找利用阳离子聚丙烯酰胺(cPAM)和淀粉(CS)与阴离子聚丙烯酰胺(aPAM)和淀粉(AS)相结合的方法来增强由旧瓦楞纸箱(OCC)制成的纸。通过修改湿端条件和添加方式,寻找提高纸张强度的最佳条件,同时考虑排水性能、生产成本和机器可操作性的估计。结果表明,cPAM Percol 182对纸张的拉伸强度、破裂强度和折叠强度的增强效果最好。两性pam Hercobond 6350和PS 1280的性能稍差。而aPAM (Percol 155)的抗拉强度仅比阴离子淀粉好,而阴离子淀粉的抗拉强度最差。使用PS 1280时,其撕裂强度最高。添加剂的疏水效果因聚电解质种类和用量的不同而不同。Percol 182显著提高了纸浆的自由度,使水分流失得更快。其次是Hercobond 6350,而Percol 155显著降低了牙髓的游离度。当使用固定的cPAM和CS来调节两性PAM或aPAM的剂量时,纸张强度随所使用的聚电解质复合物而变化。纸的拉伸强度以纸浆浓度为1.00%,Percol 182的拉伸指数为1.00%为最佳,并对所得手纸的拉伸指标进行了优化。然而,当考虑成本因素时,连续添加0.75% /0.25%剂量的CS/Percol 155可有效提高拉伸性能。在撕裂强度方面,PS 1280以0.25/0.75%和0.50/0.50%的剂量顺序加入CS较好。从成本考虑,以0.75/0.25%或0.50/0.50%的剂量依次添加CS和AS,增强效果最佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Taiwan Journal of Forest Science
Taiwan Journal of Forest Science Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Taiwan Journal of Forest Science is an academic publication that welcomes contributions from around the world. The journal covers all aspects of forest research, both basic and applied, including Forest Biology and Ecology (tree breeding, silviculture, soils, etc.), Forest Management (watershed management, forest pests and diseases, forest fire, wildlife, recreation, etc.), Biotechnology, and Wood Science. Manuscripts acceptable to the journal include (1) research papers, (2) research notes, (3) review articles, and (4) monographs. A research note differs from a research paper in its scope which is less-comprehensive, yet it contains important information. In other words, a research note offers an innovative perspective or new discovery which is worthy of early disclosure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信