Synthesizing Research on Learner Perceptions of CMC Use in EFL/ESL Writing

IF 2.3 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
CALICO Journal Pub Date : 2018-10-13 DOI:10.1558/CJ.34818
Erhan Aslan, H. Çiftçi
{"title":"Synthesizing Research on Learner Perceptions of CMC Use in EFL/ESL Writing","authors":"Erhan Aslan, H. Çiftçi","doi":"10.1558/CJ.34818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents a synthesis of empirical research reporting on learners' perceptions about the effectiveness of CMC in EFL/ESL writing classes. Conducting a multi-stage systematic review, we analyzed 52 scholarly research articles published between 2000 and 2016. Our findings indicate that while learners perceive linguistic benefits from interacting with different interlocutors in mainly blog- and wiki-mediated writing activities, they also report challenges with respect to task demands and the quality of feedback. Learners perceive CMC-integrated writing to be authentic and interactive, thereby developing their motivation, autonomy, and identity as writers. Finally, the implications of this review and the directions for future research in the domain of CMC and EFL/ESL writing are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46819,"journal":{"name":"CALICO Journal","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CALICO Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/CJ.34818","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This study presents a synthesis of empirical research reporting on learners' perceptions about the effectiveness of CMC in EFL/ESL writing classes. Conducting a multi-stage systematic review, we analyzed 52 scholarly research articles published between 2000 and 2016. Our findings indicate that while learners perceive linguistic benefits from interacting with different interlocutors in mainly blog- and wiki-mediated writing activities, they also report challenges with respect to task demands and the quality of feedback. Learners perceive CMC-integrated writing to be authentic and interactive, thereby developing their motivation, autonomy, and identity as writers. Finally, the implications of this review and the directions for future research in the domain of CMC and EFL/ESL writing are discussed.
学习者对英语/英语写作中CMC使用认知的综合研究
本研究综合了学习者对英语/ESL写作课中CMC有效性的看法的实证研究报告。我们进行了多阶段的系统回顾,分析了2000年至2016年间发表的52篇学术研究文章。我们的研究结果表明,虽然学习者认为在博客和维基媒体的写作活动中与不同的对话者互动会带来语言上的好处,但他们也报告了任务要求和反馈质量方面的挑战。学习者认为整合cmc的写作是真实的和互动的,从而发展他们作为作者的动机、自主性和身份。最后,对本文的研究意义和未来研究方向进行了展望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CALICO Journal
CALICO Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信