Acceptability and barriers to adopting physical therapy and rehabilitation as standard of care in hernia disease: a prospective national survey of providers and preliminary data.

Journal, physical therapy education Pub Date : 2022-06-01 Epub Date: 2022-04-10 DOI:10.1007/s10029-022-02606-w
S Renshaw, R Peterson, R Lewis, M Olson, W Henderson, B Kreuz, B Poulose, R M Higgins
{"title":"Acceptability and barriers to adopting physical therapy and rehabilitation as standard of care in hernia disease: a prospective national survey of providers and preliminary data.","authors":"S Renshaw, R Peterson, R Lewis, M Olson, W Henderson, B Kreuz, B Poulose, R M Higgins","doi":"10.1007/s10029-022-02606-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Physical therapy (PT) and rehabilitation are widely utilized in a variety of disease processes to improve function, return to activities of daily living (ADLs), and promote overall recovery. However, hernia repair has struggled to adopt this practice despite operations occurring in one of the most dynamic parts of the body - the abdominal core. This study sought to understand perspectives and perceived barriers regarding the incorporation of PT and rehabilitation in hernia care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A standardized rehabilitation protocol was developed by the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC), a national quality improvement initiative specific to hernia disease, and launched in 2019. Empiric data from the ACHQC was then obtained to describe preliminary utilization. A prospective electronic survey was then deployed to all surgeons participating in the ACHQC to aid in interpreting the identified trends. The survey included questions regarding the current use of PT in their practice, as well as further opinions on the functionality, benefit, and barriers to its use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 1,544 patients who were listed as receiving some form of postoperative rehabilitation, of which 992 (64.2%) had a primary diagnosis of ventral hernia and 552 (35.8%) had an inguinal hernia. Among patients who had a ventral hernia, 863 (87.0%) received self-directed rehabilitation exercises compared to 488 (88.4%) of inguinal hernia patients. The subsequent survey exploring these trends was completed by 46 ACHQC surgeons (10.2%). More than half (52%) reported using PT for hernia patients, primarily in abdominal wall reconstruction cases (92%). Of those who did not report using PT, 50% cited unknown clinical benefit and another 27% cited unknown PT resources. PT utilization was typically concentrated to the postoperative period (58%), while 42% reported also using it preoperatively. Despite 72% of respondents citing a perceived benefit of PT in hernia patients, overall use of PT was primarily reported as 'occasional' by 42%, with another 27% reporting 'rarely.' Perceived benefits of PT included increased core strength, stability, mobility, patient satisfaction, education, independence, earlier return to work and ADLs, overall improved recovery, and decreased risk of postoperative issues. Reported barriers to implementing PT in practice or adapting the ACHQC Rehabilitation Protocol included lack of education, lack of evidence of clinical benefit, and difficulties operationalizing the protocol.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A national survey of hernia surgeons demonstrated willingness to adopt PT and rehabilitation protocols in their clinical practices and noted a high perceived benefit to patients. However, lack of education and evidence regarding the protocol may represent important barriers to overcome in widely disseminating these resources to patients. These gaps can be addressed through dedicated educational venues and additional studies establishing PT and rehabilitation as critical future adjuncts for the recovery of hernia repair patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":91351,"journal":{"name":"Journal, physical therapy education","volume":"6 1","pages":"865-871"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal, physical therapy education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-022-02606-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/4/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Physical therapy (PT) and rehabilitation are widely utilized in a variety of disease processes to improve function, return to activities of daily living (ADLs), and promote overall recovery. However, hernia repair has struggled to adopt this practice despite operations occurring in one of the most dynamic parts of the body - the abdominal core. This study sought to understand perspectives and perceived barriers regarding the incorporation of PT and rehabilitation in hernia care.

Methods: A standardized rehabilitation protocol was developed by the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC), a national quality improvement initiative specific to hernia disease, and launched in 2019. Empiric data from the ACHQC was then obtained to describe preliminary utilization. A prospective electronic survey was then deployed to all surgeons participating in the ACHQC to aid in interpreting the identified trends. The survey included questions regarding the current use of PT in their practice, as well as further opinions on the functionality, benefit, and barriers to its use.

Results: We identified 1,544 patients who were listed as receiving some form of postoperative rehabilitation, of which 992 (64.2%) had a primary diagnosis of ventral hernia and 552 (35.8%) had an inguinal hernia. Among patients who had a ventral hernia, 863 (87.0%) received self-directed rehabilitation exercises compared to 488 (88.4%) of inguinal hernia patients. The subsequent survey exploring these trends was completed by 46 ACHQC surgeons (10.2%). More than half (52%) reported using PT for hernia patients, primarily in abdominal wall reconstruction cases (92%). Of those who did not report using PT, 50% cited unknown clinical benefit and another 27% cited unknown PT resources. PT utilization was typically concentrated to the postoperative period (58%), while 42% reported also using it preoperatively. Despite 72% of respondents citing a perceived benefit of PT in hernia patients, overall use of PT was primarily reported as 'occasional' by 42%, with another 27% reporting 'rarely.' Perceived benefits of PT included increased core strength, stability, mobility, patient satisfaction, education, independence, earlier return to work and ADLs, overall improved recovery, and decreased risk of postoperative issues. Reported barriers to implementing PT in practice or adapting the ACHQC Rehabilitation Protocol included lack of education, lack of evidence of clinical benefit, and difficulties operationalizing the protocol.

Conclusion: A national survey of hernia surgeons demonstrated willingness to adopt PT and rehabilitation protocols in their clinical practices and noted a high perceived benefit to patients. However, lack of education and evidence regarding the protocol may represent important barriers to overcome in widely disseminating these resources to patients. These gaps can be addressed through dedicated educational venues and additional studies establishing PT and rehabilitation as critical future adjuncts for the recovery of hernia repair patients.

将物理治疗和康复作为疝气疾病标准护理的可接受性和障碍:对医疗服务提供者的前瞻性全国调查和初步数据。
目的:物理治疗(PT)和康复被广泛应用于各种疾病的治疗过程中,以改善功能、恢复日常生活活动(ADLs)并促进整体康复。然而,尽管手术发生在人体最活跃的部位之一--腹部核心,疝气修补术却很难采用这种做法。本研究旨在了解有关在疝气护理中纳入PT和康复治疗的观点和障碍:腹部核心健康质量合作组织(ACHQC)制定了标准化康复方案,这是一项专门针对疝气疾病的全国性质量改进计划,于 2019 年启动。然后从 ACHQC 获得经验数据,以描述初步使用情况。随后,向所有参与 ACHQC 的外科医生发放了一份前瞻性电子调查表,以帮助解释已确定的趋势。调查内容包括目前在其临床实践中使用 PT 的情况,以及对其功能、益处和使用障碍的进一步看法:我们发现有 1544 名患者接受了某种形式的术后康复治疗,其中 992 人(64.2%)的主要诊断为腹股沟疝,552 人(35.8%)的主要诊断为腹股沟疝。在腹股沟疝患者中,有 863 人(87.0%)接受了自主康复锻炼,而腹股沟疝患者中则有 488 人(88.4%)。随后,46 名 ACHQC 外科医生(10.2%)完成了对这些趋势的调查。半数以上(52%)的外科医生表示对疝气患者使用过物理治疗,主要用于腹壁重建病例(92%)。在未报告使用 PT 的医生中,50% 表示临床获益不明,另有 27% 表示 PT 资源不明。PT 的使用通常集中在术后阶段(58%),42% 的受访者表示也会在术前使用。尽管有 72% 的受访者认为疝气患者可从 PT 中获益,但 42% 的受访者表示 PT 的总体使用情况主要是 "偶尔",另有 27% 的受访者表示 "很少"。他们认为辅助治疗的益处包括增强核心力量、稳定性、活动能力、患者满意度、教育、独立性、更早恢复工作和日常活动能力、全面改善恢复情况以及降低术后问题的风险。据报告,在实践中实施辅助治疗或调整 ACHQC 康复方案的障碍包括缺乏教育、缺乏临床获益的证据以及方案操作上的困难:一项针对全国疝外科医生的调查显示,他们愿意在临床实践中采用PT和康复治疗方案,并认为这对患者有很大益处。然而,在向患者广泛传播这些资源的过程中,缺乏相关教育和证据可能是需要克服的重要障碍。可以通过专门的教育场所和更多的研究来弥补这些不足,将物理治疗和康复确定为疝修补术患者未来康复的重要辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信