The Scope of Statutory Permissiveness: Private Actions to Enforce Self-Evaluation and Transition Plans under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
Casey R. Fronk
{"title":"The Scope of Statutory Permissiveness: Private Actions to Enforce Self-Evaluation and Transition Plans under Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act","authors":"Casey R. Fronk","doi":"10.2307/20141864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Toby Tyler, a former police officer disabled in the line of duty, was convinced that his hometown's attempts to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act' (ADA) were palpably inadequate. The city claimed it was financially incapable of modifying its sidewalks and curbs in a timely manner, and it resisted Tyler's repeated requests for other facilitative adaptations. Although Tyler desired to be active in civic affairs, the city permitted its advisory committees to convene in a restaurant lacking handicap-accessible restrooms, and the City Commission refused to generate audio copies of important documents debated in its biweekly meetings. Tyler enjoyed watching tennis and baseball, and yet the city delayed constructing the handicap ramps necessary to provide egress from certain recreational viewing areas. After frequent but ultimately ineffective attempts to convince the city to comply voluntarily with the ADA, Tyler brought suit for injunctive relief. However, rather than premising liability solely on violations of the ADA itself, Tyler also included a more adventitious claim: that the city had failed to formulate an adequate transition plan and selfevaluation plan required by Title II's implementing regulations, which","PeriodicalId":51436,"journal":{"name":"University of Chicago Law Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Chicago Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/20141864","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Toby Tyler, a former police officer disabled in the line of duty, was convinced that his hometown's attempts to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act' (ADA) were palpably inadequate. The city claimed it was financially incapable of modifying its sidewalks and curbs in a timely manner, and it resisted Tyler's repeated requests for other facilitative adaptations. Although Tyler desired to be active in civic affairs, the city permitted its advisory committees to convene in a restaurant lacking handicap-accessible restrooms, and the City Commission refused to generate audio copies of important documents debated in its biweekly meetings. Tyler enjoyed watching tennis and baseball, and yet the city delayed constructing the handicap ramps necessary to provide egress from certain recreational viewing areas. After frequent but ultimately ineffective attempts to convince the city to comply voluntarily with the ADA, Tyler brought suit for injunctive relief. However, rather than premising liability solely on violations of the ADA itself, Tyler also included a more adventitious claim: that the city had failed to formulate an adequate transition plan and selfevaluation plan required by Title II's implementing regulations, which
法定许可的范围:根据《美国残疾人法》第二章强制执行自我评估和过渡计划的私人行动
托比·泰勒(Toby Tyler)是一名前警察,在执行任务时残疾,他确信他的家乡在遵守《美国残疾人法案》(ADA)方面的努力显然是不够的。市政府声称,他们没有财力及时改造人行道和路缘,并拒绝了泰勒多次提出的其他便利改造的要求。虽然泰勒希望积极参与公民事务,但该市允许其咨询委员会在没有残疾人卫生间的餐馆召开会议,而市委员会拒绝在其两周会议上辩论的重要文件的音频副本。泰勒喜欢看网球和棒球比赛,但市政府却迟迟不修建残疾人坡道,而这些坡道是通往某些娱乐观赏区的必经之路。在多次试图说服该市自愿遵守《美国残疾人法》但最终无效之后,泰勒提起诉讼,要求获得禁令救济。然而,泰勒并没有将责任完全建立在违反《美国残疾人法》本身的基础上,他还提出了一个更为偶然的主张:该市未能制定第二章实施条例所要求的适当的过渡计划和自我评估计划
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The University of Chicago Law Review is a quarterly journal of legal scholarship. Often cited in Supreme Court and other court opinions, as well as in other scholarly works, it is among the most influential journals in the field. Students have full responsibility for editing and publishing the Law Review; they also contribute original scholarship of their own. The Law Review"s editorial board selects all pieces for publication and, with the assistance of staff members, performs substantive and technical edits on each of these pieces prior to publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信