{"title":"Evaluation of the tensile strength of structural finger-jointed lumber.","authors":"Yeh MinChyuan, Lin Yuli, Huang YungChin","doi":"10.7075/TJFS.201103.0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A study was undertaken to evaluate the tensile strength performance of both vertically and horizontally finger-jointed laminae with 3 different lengths of finger profiles for 5 softwood species. Douglas fir finger-jointed lumber showed the best joint efficiency at 74.1%, followed by spruce-pine-fir (SPF) groups, at 65%, among the 5 wood species. Both Japanese cedar and southern pine finger-jointed lumber had lower joint efficiencies due to weak finger profiles causing early failure in tension. Southern pine finger-jointed lumber was found to have the highest tensile strength, 116.6% higher than the lowest Japanese cedar group, followed by the Douglas fir group which was 65.9% higher. The hemlock and SPF groups had similar tensile strengths, and they were also higher than the Japanese cedar group by 46.8 and 40.7%, respectively. The tensile strength of lumber joined with a 21-mm long finger profile showed a significantly lower value than those with 18- and 24-mm finger profile groups by 11.3 and 8.5%, respectively, due to the wide finger tips. The results show that there was no significant difference in tensile strength of finger-jointed lumber between horizontal and vertical finger formation. With the exception of the 21-mm finger-jointed group, slightly higher tensile strength (7.4%) for the 18- and 24-mm finger length groups with vertical finger-joints was obtained, compared to those with horizontal joints.","PeriodicalId":22180,"journal":{"name":"Taiwan Journal of Forest Science","volume":"79 1","pages":"59-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Taiwan Journal of Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7075/TJFS.201103.0059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
A study was undertaken to evaluate the tensile strength performance of both vertically and horizontally finger-jointed laminae with 3 different lengths of finger profiles for 5 softwood species. Douglas fir finger-jointed lumber showed the best joint efficiency at 74.1%, followed by spruce-pine-fir (SPF) groups, at 65%, among the 5 wood species. Both Japanese cedar and southern pine finger-jointed lumber had lower joint efficiencies due to weak finger profiles causing early failure in tension. Southern pine finger-jointed lumber was found to have the highest tensile strength, 116.6% higher than the lowest Japanese cedar group, followed by the Douglas fir group which was 65.9% higher. The hemlock and SPF groups had similar tensile strengths, and they were also higher than the Japanese cedar group by 46.8 and 40.7%, respectively. The tensile strength of lumber joined with a 21-mm long finger profile showed a significantly lower value than those with 18- and 24-mm finger profile groups by 11.3 and 8.5%, respectively, due to the wide finger tips. The results show that there was no significant difference in tensile strength of finger-jointed lumber between horizontal and vertical finger formation. With the exception of the 21-mm finger-jointed group, slightly higher tensile strength (7.4%) for the 18- and 24-mm finger length groups with vertical finger-joints was obtained, compared to those with horizontal joints.
期刊介绍:
The Taiwan Journal of Forest Science is an academic publication that welcomes contributions from around the world. The journal covers all aspects of forest research, both basic and applied, including Forest Biology and Ecology (tree breeding, silviculture, soils, etc.), Forest Management (watershed management, forest pests and diseases, forest fire, wildlife, recreation, etc.), Biotechnology, and Wood Science. Manuscripts acceptable to the journal include (1) research papers, (2) research notes, (3) review articles, and (4) monographs. A research note differs from a research paper in its scope which is less-comprehensive, yet it contains important information. In other words, a research note offers an innovative perspective or new discovery which is worthy of early disclosure.