Evaluation of Dry-Heat Cookery Method on Volatile Flavor Compound Development and Consumer Evaluation of Six Beef Muscles

K. Vierck, J. Legako, J. Brooks
{"title":"Evaluation of Dry-Heat Cookery Method on Volatile Flavor Compound Development and Consumer Evaluation of Six Beef Muscles","authors":"K. Vierck, J. Legako, J. Brooks","doi":"10.22175/MMB.11710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this study was to determine the influence of dry-heat cookery on beef flavor development of multiple beef muscles. Beef strip loins, top sirloin butts, paired tenderloins, paired shoulder clods, and chuck rolls were collected from USDA Low Choice carcasses (Small00–Small100 marbling; N = 20). Subprimals were wet aged in the absence of light for 21 d at 0°C to 4°C. Subprimals were fabricated into 2.54-cm-thick steaks representative of the following muscles: Gluteus medius, Infraspinatus, Longissimus lumborum, Psoas major, Serratus ventralis, and Triceps brachii and randomly assigned to one of 4 dry-heat cookery methods: charbroiler grill (CHAR), clamshell grill (CLAM), convection oven (OVEN), and salamander broiler (SALA). Steaks were cooked to a medium degree of doneness (71°C) on the randomly assigned cooking method. Untrained consumer panelists (N = 300) evaluated each sample for flavor, tenderness, juiciness, and overall liking. No interactions were observed between cooking method and muscle (P ≥ 0.344) for any palatability traits evaluated. Consumers preferred CHAR steaks (P < 0.05) over CLAM steaks for flavor, tenderness, juiciness, and overall liking. Additionally, CLAM steaks were rated lower (P < 0.05) than all other methods for tenderness and juiciness. OVEN and SALA steaks were rated higher (P < 0.05) than CLAM steaks by consumers for tenderness and juiciness but were similar (P > 0.05) to CLAM steaks for overall liking. CHAR steaks produced a greater concentration of Maillard compounds compared with the other cooking methods. Steaks cooked using OVEN and SALA (P < 0.05) produced more lipid oxidation products. Additionally, CHAR steaks produced the greatest (P < 0.05) total volatile production compared with all other treatments, which may be a result of the combination of Maillard reaction products and the lipid degradation products.","PeriodicalId":18316,"journal":{"name":"Meat and Muscle Biology","volume":"91 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat and Muscle Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22175/MMB.11710","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine the influence of dry-heat cookery on beef flavor development of multiple beef muscles. Beef strip loins, top sirloin butts, paired tenderloins, paired shoulder clods, and chuck rolls were collected from USDA Low Choice carcasses (Small00–Small100 marbling; N = 20). Subprimals were wet aged in the absence of light for 21 d at 0°C to 4°C. Subprimals were fabricated into 2.54-cm-thick steaks representative of the following muscles: Gluteus medius, Infraspinatus, Longissimus lumborum, Psoas major, Serratus ventralis, and Triceps brachii and randomly assigned to one of 4 dry-heat cookery methods: charbroiler grill (CHAR), clamshell grill (CLAM), convection oven (OVEN), and salamander broiler (SALA). Steaks were cooked to a medium degree of doneness (71°C) on the randomly assigned cooking method. Untrained consumer panelists (N = 300) evaluated each sample for flavor, tenderness, juiciness, and overall liking. No interactions were observed between cooking method and muscle (P ≥ 0.344) for any palatability traits evaluated. Consumers preferred CHAR steaks (P < 0.05) over CLAM steaks for flavor, tenderness, juiciness, and overall liking. Additionally, CLAM steaks were rated lower (P < 0.05) than all other methods for tenderness and juiciness. OVEN and SALA steaks were rated higher (P < 0.05) than CLAM steaks by consumers for tenderness and juiciness but were similar (P > 0.05) to CLAM steaks for overall liking. CHAR steaks produced a greater concentration of Maillard compounds compared with the other cooking methods. Steaks cooked using OVEN and SALA (P < 0.05) produced more lipid oxidation products. Additionally, CHAR steaks produced the greatest (P < 0.05) total volatile production compared with all other treatments, which may be a result of the combination of Maillard reaction products and the lipid degradation products.
干热烹饪法对六种牛肉肌肉挥发性风味化合物开发及消费者评价的评价
本研究的目的是确定干热烹饪对牛肉多种肌肉风味发展的影响。牛里脊、上牛里脊、成对里脊、成对肩块和牛颈卷取自美国农业部低选择胴体(Small00-Small100大理石纹;N = 20)。亚原始动物在0°C至4°C的无光条件下湿老化21 d。将亚原始动物制作成2.54 cm厚的牛排,代表以下肌肉:臀中肌、棘下肌、腰最长肌、大腰肌、腹锯肌和肱三头肌,并随机分配到4种干热烹饪方法中的一种:炭烤炉(CHAR)、蛤烤炉(CLAM)、对流烤炉(oven)和火蜥蜴烤炉(SALA)。用随机分配的烹饪方法将牛排煮至中等熟度(71°C)。未经培训的消费者小组成员(N = 300)评估每个样品的味道、嫩度、多汁性和总体喜好。烹煮方法与肌肉间无交互作用(P≥0.344)。消费者在风味、嫩度、多汁性和总体喜好方面比CLAM牛排更喜欢CHAR牛排(P < 0.05)。此外,CLAM牛排的嫩度和多汁性评分低于其他所有方法(P < 0.05)。消费者对烤炉牛排和SALA牛排的嫩度和多汁度的评价高于CLAM牛排(P < 0.05),但总体喜欢度与CLAM牛排相似(P > 0.05)。与其他烹饪方法相比,炭烤牛排产生的美拉德化合物浓度更高。烤炉和SALA处理的牛排产生更多的脂质氧化产物(P < 0.05)。此外,与其他处理相比,CHAR处理的总挥发物产量最高(P < 0.05),这可能是美拉德反应产物和脂质降解产物共同作用的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信