Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio, Circulating Tumor Cells and Circulating Tumor Microemboli as Predictors of Thrombosis in Patients with Gastric Cancer

Bruno Soriano Pignataro, Emne Ali Abdallah, Vinicius Fernando Calsavara, Celso Abdon Lopes Mello, K. Nishinari, Guilherme Yazbek, L. T. Domingos Chinen
{"title":"Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio, Circulating Tumor Cells and Circulating Tumor Microemboli as Predictors of Thrombosis in Patients with Gastric Cancer","authors":"Bruno Soriano Pignataro, Emne Ali Abdallah, Vinicius Fernando Calsavara, Celso Abdon Lopes Mello, K. Nishinari, Guilherme Yazbek, L. T. Domingos Chinen","doi":"10.31487/j.cor.2021.10.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in oncology patients. There are no accurate risk assessment tools to predict venous thromboembolism (VTE). Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor microemboli (CTM), and high platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) may predispose to VTE. \nObjective: To evaluate correlations of CTCs, CTM, and PLR with VTE and progression-free survival (PFS) in gastric cancer patients.\nMethods: Patients with gastric cancer were recruited (March 2016 to April 2017). CTCs were assayed by ISET at two timepoints: before neoadjuvant treatment (CTC1) and after surgery/before adjuvant therapy (CTC2) for patients with localized disease, and before first-line chemotherapy (CTC1) and after 6 months (CTC2) for patients with metastases. VTE incidence was determined retrospectively. PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.\nResults: We studied 93 patients. According to Khorana scores, 63 (67.7%) patients were at intermediate and 30 (32.3%) were at high risk for VTE. VTE incidence was 20.4% and CTM were found in 39.8%. VTE developed in 7/37 (18.9%) CTM-positive and in 11/50 (22%) CTM-negative patients (p=0.93). When PLR >288, VTE occurred in 7/14 patients (p=0.005). PLR also associated with poor PFS (p<0.0001). CTC2 was associated with poor PFS (p<0.0001). CTC2, PLR and VTE were independent prognostic factors for PFS (p=0.005, 0.043, and <0.0001 respectively).\nConclusion: PLR is a prognostic indicator for PFS and for VTE in gastric cancer. Neither CTC, nor CTM improved risk stratification for VTE in our population.","PeriodicalId":10487,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Oncology and Research","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Oncology and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31487/j.cor.2021.10.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in oncology patients. There are no accurate risk assessment tools to predict venous thromboembolism (VTE). Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating tumor microemboli (CTM), and high platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) may predispose to VTE. Objective: To evaluate correlations of CTCs, CTM, and PLR with VTE and progression-free survival (PFS) in gastric cancer patients. Methods: Patients with gastric cancer were recruited (March 2016 to April 2017). CTCs were assayed by ISET at two timepoints: before neoadjuvant treatment (CTC1) and after surgery/before adjuvant therapy (CTC2) for patients with localized disease, and before first-line chemotherapy (CTC1) and after 6 months (CTC2) for patients with metastases. VTE incidence was determined retrospectively. PFS was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: We studied 93 patients. According to Khorana scores, 63 (67.7%) patients were at intermediate and 30 (32.3%) were at high risk for VTE. VTE incidence was 20.4% and CTM were found in 39.8%. VTE developed in 7/37 (18.9%) CTM-positive and in 11/50 (22%) CTM-negative patients (p=0.93). When PLR >288, VTE occurred in 7/14 patients (p=0.005). PLR also associated with poor PFS (p<0.0001). CTC2 was associated with poor PFS (p<0.0001). CTC2, PLR and VTE were independent prognostic factors for PFS (p=0.005, 0.043, and <0.0001 respectively). Conclusion: PLR is a prognostic indicator for PFS and for VTE in gastric cancer. Neither CTC, nor CTM improved risk stratification for VTE in our population.
血小板淋巴细胞比、循环肿瘤细胞和循环肿瘤微栓子作为胃癌患者血栓形成的预测因子
背景:肿瘤相关血栓形成(CAT)是肿瘤患者发病和死亡的主要原因。目前还没有准确的风险评估工具来预测静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)。循环肿瘤细胞(CTCs)、循环肿瘤微栓塞(CTM)和高血小板淋巴细胞比(PLR)可能易患静脉血栓栓塞。目的:评价胃癌患者CTCs、CTM、PLR与VTE及无进展生存期(PFS)的相关性。方法:招募胃癌患者(2016年3月~ 2017年4月)。ISET在两个时间点检测ctc:局部疾病患者新辅助治疗前(CTC1)和手术后/辅助治疗前(CTC2),转移患者一线化疗前(CTC1)和6个月后(CTC2)。回顾性测定静脉血栓栓塞发生率。采用Kaplan-Meier分析估计PFS。结果:我们研究了93例患者。根据Khorana评分,63例(67.7%)患者处于中度危危,30例(32.3%)患者处于高危危危。静脉血栓栓塞发生率为20.4%,CTM发生率为39.8%。7/37 (18.9%) ctm阳性患者和11/50 (22%)ctm阴性患者发生静脉血栓栓塞(p=0.93)。当PLR >288时,7/14的患者发生静脉血栓栓塞(p=0.005)。PLR也与不良PFS相关(p<0.0001)。CTC2与不良PFS相关(p<0.0001)。CTC2、PLR和VTE是PFS的独立预后因素(p分别为0.005、0.043和<0.0001)。结论:PLR是胃癌PFS和VTE的预后指标。在我们的人群中,CTC和CTM都没有改善静脉血栓栓塞的风险分层。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信