Outpatient Care Aspects of Rheumatic Patients in Latvia: Real Life Data in the Context of the First Month of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Q4 Multidisciplinary
J. Zepa, V. Lavrentjevs, Santa Miķēna, J. Arajs, Tamāra Zavgorodnaja, E. Sikora, Sarmīte Ābelīte, Renāte Diura, I. Balčune, K. Ivanova, Pauls Rubīns, I. Trapina, D. Andersone, I. Buliņa
{"title":"Outpatient Care Aspects of Rheumatic Patients in Latvia: Real Life Data in the Context of the First Month of the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"J. Zepa, V. Lavrentjevs, Santa Miķēna, J. Arajs, Tamāra Zavgorodnaja, E. Sikora, Sarmīte Ābelīte, Renāte Diura, I. Balčune, K. Ivanova, Pauls Rubīns, I. Trapina, D. Andersone, I. Buliņa","doi":"10.2478/prolas-2023-0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The aim of this study was to analyse the rheumatic disease profile and treatment aspects of the patients consulted in the outpatient department of Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital during the first month of the COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 March 13 till April 14. A total of 457 (76.04%) remote and 144 (23.96%) face-to-face consultations were analysed, totalling 601 patients: 434 (72.21%) females and 167 (27.79%) males with mean age 51.40 ± 14.73 years. Rheumatoid arthritis (223 (37.10%)), psoriatic arthritis (93 (15.47%)) and ankylosing spondylitis (80 (13.31%)) were the most frequently consulted conditions. Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or immunosuppressants (IS) were taken by 515 (85.69%) patients. These included synthetic DMARD (242 (46.99%)), mainly methotrexate; and biologic DMARD (156 (30.29%)), mainly tumour necrosis factor inhibitor. More than one-half of the cohort (427 (71.05%)) was not taking a glucocorticoid (GC). NSAIDs were used in 391 (65.08%) patients, mainly on demand (354 (90.54%)). Most patients (401 (66.72%)) had no comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, malignancy and/or chronic respiratory disease). The profile of patients consulted in the outpatient department consisted mainly of middle-age females with autoimmune inflammatory arthritis treated by DMARD. Most of the patients did not use GCs, they did not regularly use NSAIDs and did not have comorbidities. Telemedicine is an acceptable way of care delivery for chronic rheumatic patients with previously known disease and treatment, especially during a pandemic.","PeriodicalId":20651,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.","volume":"28 1","pages":"24 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Latvian Academy of Sciences. Section B. Natural, Exact, and Applied Sciences.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/prolas-2023-0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this study was to analyse the rheumatic disease profile and treatment aspects of the patients consulted in the outpatient department of Pauls Stradiņš Clinical University Hospital during the first month of the COVID-19 pandemic from 2020 March 13 till April 14. A total of 457 (76.04%) remote and 144 (23.96%) face-to-face consultations were analysed, totalling 601 patients: 434 (72.21%) females and 167 (27.79%) males with mean age 51.40 ± 14.73 years. Rheumatoid arthritis (223 (37.10%)), psoriatic arthritis (93 (15.47%)) and ankylosing spondylitis (80 (13.31%)) were the most frequently consulted conditions. Disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or immunosuppressants (IS) were taken by 515 (85.69%) patients. These included synthetic DMARD (242 (46.99%)), mainly methotrexate; and biologic DMARD (156 (30.29%)), mainly tumour necrosis factor inhibitor. More than one-half of the cohort (427 (71.05%)) was not taking a glucocorticoid (GC). NSAIDs were used in 391 (65.08%) patients, mainly on demand (354 (90.54%)). Most patients (401 (66.72%)) had no comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, malignancy and/or chronic respiratory disease). The profile of patients consulted in the outpatient department consisted mainly of middle-age females with autoimmune inflammatory arthritis treated by DMARD. Most of the patients did not use GCs, they did not regularly use NSAIDs and did not have comorbidities. Telemedicine is an acceptable way of care delivery for chronic rheumatic patients with previously known disease and treatment, especially during a pandemic.
拉脱维亚风湿病患者门诊护理方面:COVID-19大流行第一个月背景下的真实生活数据
摘要本研究旨在分析2020年3月13日至4月14日2019冠状病毒病大流行第一个月期间保罗Stradiņš临床大学医院门诊就诊患者的风湿病概况和治疗情况。共601例患者,其中女性434例(72.21%),男性167例(27.79%),平均年龄51.40±14.73岁。类风湿关节炎223例(37.10%)、银屑病关节炎93例(15.47%)、强直性脊柱炎80例(13.31%)是最常被问及的疾病。515例(85.69%)患者服用了改善疾病的抗风湿药(DMARDs)或免疫抑制剂(IS)。其中包括合成DMARD(242(46.99%)),主要为甲氨蝶呤;生物DMARD(156例(30.29%)),主要是肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂。超过一半的队列(427人(71.05%))未服用糖皮质激素(GC)。391例(65.08%)患者使用非甾体抗炎药,以按需使用为主(354例(90.54%))。大多数患者(401例(66.72%))无合并症(高血压、糖尿病、恶性肿瘤和/或慢性呼吸道疾病)。门诊就诊的患者主要是经DMARD治疗的中年女性自身免疫性炎症性关节炎。大多数患者没有使用GCs,他们没有定期使用非甾体抗炎药,也没有合并症。远程医疗是对已有已知疾病和治疗的慢性风湿病患者提供护理的一种可接受的方式,特别是在大流行期间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信